Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 3041
References

References

Baayen, Harald
2009 “Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity.” In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 900–919. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 40 ]
2006 “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82 (4): 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2014 “Conventional Combinations in Pockets of Productivity: English Resultatives and Dutch Ditransitives Expressing Excess.” In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, ed. by Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman, and Gijsbert Rutten, 251–281. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dal, Georgette, and Fiammetta Namer
2017 “Playful Nonce-Formations, Creativity and Productivity.” In Expanding the Lexicon. Linguistic Innovation, Morphological Productivity, and Ludicity, ed. by Sabine Arndt-Lappe, Angelika Braun, Claudine Moulin, and Esme Winter-Froemel, 203–228. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Desagulier, Guillaume
2016 “A Lesson from Associative Learning: Asymmetry and Productivity in Multiple-Slot Constructions.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12 (2): 173–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Regular Constructions: The Case of Let Alone .” Language 64 (3): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2019Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamans, Camiel
2020 “Contra de linguïstische preutsheid: Over -gate en andere libfixen [Against linguistic prudishness: On -gate and other libfixes].” Nederlandse Taalkunde 25 (2/3): 319–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul
2002Patterns of coining. Typoscript available at http://​www1​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/~kay​/coining​.pdf
2013 “The Limits of (Construction) Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 32–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel, and Sarah Sippach
2019 “Nerdalicious Scientainment: A Network Analysis of English Libfixes.” Word Structure 12 (3): 353–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2018 “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: A Distributional Semantic Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14 (1): 65–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfänder, Stefan, and Heike Behrens
2016Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1999Morphological productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey, and Rodney Huddleston
2002 “Prepositions and preposition phrases.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. by Rodney Huddleston, and Geoffrey Pullum, 597–661. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultink, Hendrik
1961 “Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen [Productivity as a morphological phenomenon].” Forum der Letteren 2: 110–125.Google Scholar
[ p. 41 ]
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans
2003The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar