Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 4251
References

[ p. 50 ]References

Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins, and Robert Malouf
2009 “Parts and Wholes: Implicative Patterns in Inflectional Paradigms.” In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, ed. by James P. Blevins, and Juliette Blevins, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2016Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2008 “Determining the Structure of Lexical Entries and Grammatical Constructions in Construction Grammar.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 113–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Zur Architektur einer konstruktionsbasierten Grammatik des Deutschen.” In Grammatik als Netzwerk von Konstruktionen. Sprachwissen im Fokus der Konstruktionsgrammatik, ed. by Alexander Lasch, and Alexander Ziem, 37–63. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1989 [1934]Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2019The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
1991Deixis und Textsorten im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Konstruktionen und Paradigmen”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37 (3): 445–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “Paradigms Lost – Paradigms Regained: Paradigms as Hyper-Constructions”. In Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar, ed. by Lotte Sommerer, and Elena Smirnova, 278–315. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S., and Martin Haspelmath
(eds.) 2013The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info, last accessed on 2020-08-18.)
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman
2004 “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch”. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Mirjam Fried, 11–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew
2016 “Network Morphology”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, ed. by Andrew Hippisley, and Gregory Stump, 482–509. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 51 ]
Jakobson, Roman
1971 [1957] “Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb”. In Selected Writings: Vol. II: Word and language, ed. by Roman Jakobson, 130–147. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman and Krystyna Pomorska
1982Poesie und Grammatik: Dialoge. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1985 “Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity.” In Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983, ed. by John Haiman, 109–150. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Deixis and Subjectivity.” In Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference, ed. by Frank Brisard, 1–28. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. Third edition. Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
1992Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der sprachlichen Kategorisierung. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Peter Juul
2016Functional Structure in Morphology and the Case of Nonfinite Verbs. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Lars Heltoft, and Lene Schøsler
2011Connecting Grammaticalisation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
(ed.) 1991Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Politt, Katja
2019 “Verbale Konstruktionen in grammatischen Paradigmen”. In Varianz in der konstruktionalen Schematizität, ed. by Dániel Czicza, Volodymyr Dekalo, and Gabriele Diewald, 217–236. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
to appear. Parts and wholes – Formen und Funktionen von Paradigmen. PhD Dissertation, Leibniz Universität Hannover.
Plungian, Vladimir A.
1998Грамматические категории, их аналоги и заместители [Grammatical categories, their analogs and alternatives]. Habilitation dissertation, Lomonosov Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar