Cover not available
Article published In:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 213–224

Pragmatic information in constructions

What do speakers generalize?

| Tel Aviv University
Despite recent advances in Construction Pragmatics, a systematic way for delimiting coded pragmatic information has yet to be offered. This squib provides a step in establishing such an account by assessing what kind of pragmatic information speakers generalize from various usage-events. Drawing on findings from Conversation Analysis, I propose a distinction between pragmatic functions as speakers’ actions, and interactional patterns as discourse-information sequences. A synchronic examination of the Hebrew multifunctional discourse marker ′at/a yode′a/′at (′know.prs.m/f.sg′) demonstrates the consistent use of the construction in an interactional pattern across numerous usage-events. A qualitative diachronic analysis of ′at/a yode′a/′at suggests that speakers may associate forms with interactional patterns rather than with functions. This preliminary evidence provides support for the generalization of interactional patterns.
Keywords: construction pragmatics, discourse markers, multifunctionality, Hebrew language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Functions vs. interactional patterns
  • 3.The generalization of interactional patterns
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00047.kuz
References (21)
References
Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2013. “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2017. “What’s Pragmatics Doing outside Constructions?” In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere, and Raphael Salkie, 115–151. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata. 2018. “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes. A Study in Recent Language Change.” Romanian Review of Linguistics 63 (4): 341–360.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1987. “A Private History of the Concept ‘Frame’.” In Concepts of Case, ed. by René Dirven, and Giinter Radden, 28–36. Tiibingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita. 2019. “Introduction: Reflections on the Role of Pragmatics in Construction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames 11 (2): 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2015a. “Conversation, Construction Grammar, and Cognition.” Language and Cognition 7 (4): 563–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Situation in Grammar or in Frames? Evidence from the So-called Baby Talk Register.” Constructions and Frames 7 (2): 258–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of you know and I mean .” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2005. “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hary, Benjamin, and Shlomo Izre’el. 2003. “The Preparatory Model of the Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH).” In Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew: Towards the Compilation of the Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH), ed. by Benjamin Hary, 189–219. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. “Multimodal Constructs – Multimodal Constructions? The Role of Constructions in the Working Memory.” Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 2009. Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Emergent Projecting Constructions: The Case of Hebrew yada (‘know’).” Studies in Language 36 (4): 785–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melnik, Nurit. 2006. “A Constructional Approach to Verb-initial Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (2): 153–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. “Lexico-grammatical Patterns, Pragmatic Associations and Discourse Frequency.” In Constructions, Collocations, Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 239–293. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. “Grammaticalization.” In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Vit Bubenik, 269–283. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Foolen, Ad
2023. CONSTRUCTION PRAGMATICS IN A WIDER CONTEXT. AN ADDITION TO WEN (2022). Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Kuzai, Einat
2022. Situation-bound utterances and constructional networks: The evolution of the Hebrew see-farewell family. Lingua 272 ► pp. 103328 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.