Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 248258
References

References

Battistella, Edwin
1995 “The Syntax of the Double Modal Construction.” Linguistica Atlantica, 17: 19–44.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan
2004 “English Dialects in the North of England: Morphology and Syntax.” In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax, ed. by Bernd Kortmann, and Edgar Schneider, 114–141. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bender, Emily
2007 “Socially Meaningful Syntactic Variation in Sign-Based Grammar.” English Language & Linguistics 11 (2): 347–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans
2013 “Cognitive Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 233–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boertien, Harmon
1986 “Constituent Structure of Double Modals.” In Language Variety in the South: Perspectives in Black and White, ed. by Michael Montgomery, and Guy Bailey, 294–318. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald
1973 “Acceptability Judgments for Double Modals in Southern Dialects.” In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, ed. by Charles Bailey, and Roger Shuy, 276–286. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2013 “Usage-Based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen
2011 “Grammatical Variation in Irish English.” English Today 27 (2): 39–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Clerck, Bernard and Timothy Colleman
2013 “From Noun to Intensifier: Massa and Massa’s in Flemish Varieties of Dutch.” Language Sciences 36:147–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid
2018 “The Semantics of the Simple Tenses and Full-Verb Inversion in English: A Story of Shared Epistemic Schemas.” Constructions and Frames 10 (2): 210–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DiPaolo, Marianna
1989 “Double Modals as Single Lexical Items.” American Speech 64 (3): 195–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsman, Minta and Stanley Dubinsky
2009 “Double Modal Syntactic Patterns as Single Modal Interactions.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (1): 75–82.Google Scholar
Falk, Yehuda
1984 “The English Auxiliary System: A Lexical Functional Analysis.” Language 60: 483–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag
1982 “Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar.” Language 58: 591–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 256 ]
Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen, and Yves Peirsman
(eds.) 2010Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2007 “To Err Is Not All: What Corpus and Elicitation Can Reveal about the Use of Collocations by Learners.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55 (3): 273–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Stefan Gries
2009 “Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-Art Review.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2013 “Constructionist Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan
2013 “Data in Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 93–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini, and Diansheng Guo
2017 “Analyzing Lexical Emergence in American English online.” English Language & Linguistics 21 (1): 99–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Mapping Lexical Innovation on American Social Media”. Journal of English Linguistics 46 (4): 293–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini, Diansheng Guo, and Alice Kasakoff
2015 “Using Social Media to Map Double Modals in Modern American English.” Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44, University of Toronto, October 25.
Hasty, Daniel
2012 “This Might Could Help Us Better Understand Syntactic Variation: the Double Modal Construction in Tennessee English.” PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Hasty, Daniel, Ashley Hesson, Suzanne Wagner, and Robert Lannon
2012 “Finding Needles in the Right Haystack: Double Modals in Medical Conditions.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18 (2): 41–47.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2006 “Corpora and Introspection as Converging Evidence: The Case of Preposition Placement in English Relative Clauses.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2 (2): 165–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Preposition Placement in English: a Usage-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “Obtaining Introspective Acceptability Judgments.”In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, ed. by Manfred Krug, and Julia Schlüter, 99–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas, and Graeme Trousdale
(eds.) 2011Variation, Change, and Constructions in English. Thematic issue of Cognitive Linguistics 22 (1).Google Scholar
Hollmann, Willem
2013 “Constructions in Cognitive Sociolinguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 491–510. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hollmann, Willem, and Anna Siewierska
2007 “A Construction Grammar Account of Possessive Constructions in Lancashire Dialect: Some Advantages and Challenges.” English Language & Linguistics 11 (2): 407–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 257 ]
2011 “The Status of Frequency, Schemas, and Identity in Cognitive Sociolinguistics: A Case Study of Definite Article Reduction.” Cognitive Linguistics 22 (1): 35–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Nick
2011 “Multiple Modals.” Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North America. Typoscript available at https://​ygdp​.yale​.edu​/phenomena​/multiple​-modals. Last accessed on 12/11/2020.
Huang, Yuan, Diansheng Guo, Alice Kasakoff, and Jack Grieve
2016 “Understanding US Regional Linguistic Variation with Twitter Data Analysis.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59: 244–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard
2007 “English Dialect Syntax in Word Grammar.” English Language & Linguistics 11 (2): 383–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte, and René. Dirven
(eds.) 2008Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1982 “Space Grammar, Analyzability and the English Passive.” Language 58: 22–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 “An introduction to Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Science 10: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mishoe, Margaret, and Michael Montgomery
1994 “The Pragmatics of Multiple Modal Variation in North and South Carolina.” American Speech 69 (1): 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Gries
2009 “Collostructional Nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-Construction Associations in the International Corpus of English.” English World-Wide 30 (1): 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, Stephen
2003 “Double Modals in the Southern United States: Syntactic Structure or Syntactic Structures?” In Modality in Contemporary English, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, and Manfred Krug, 359–372. Berlin/ Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostman, Jan-Öla, and Graeme Trousdale
2013 “Dialects, Discourse, and Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 476–490. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter, and Lynn Anthonissen
2020 “Individuality in complex systems: a constructionist approach.” Cognitive Linguistics 31 (2): 185–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 “Verb Movement, UG, and the Structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey
2007 “Do Double Modals Really Exist?Language Log. http://​itre​.cis​.upenn​.edu​/~myl​/languagelog​/archives​/005136​.html (last accessed on 11/12/2020)
Pütz, Martin, Justyna Robinson, and Monika Reif
(eds.) 2014Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, David Adger, Brian Aitken, Caroline Heycock, E. Jamieson, and Gary Thoms
2019The Scots Syntax Atlas. University of Glasgow. https://​scotssyntaxatlas​.ac​.uk (last accessed on 11/12/2020).
[ p. 258 ]
Sprouse, Jon, and Carson Schütze
2019 “Grammar and the Use of Data.” In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, ed. by Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, and Gergana Popova. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar