Article published In:
The Semiotic Diversity of Language: The Case of Signed Languages
Edited by Alysson Lepeut and Inez Beukeleers
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 145178
References
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline
1995Ces mots qui ne vont pas de soi. Boucles réflexives et non-coïncidence du dire [These words that do not go without saying. Reflexive loops and non-coincidence in speech]. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Bailes, Cynthia
2001 “Integrative ASL-English Language Arts: Bridging Paths to Literacy.” Sign Language Studies 1(2): 147–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona
2018In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtine, Mikhail
1978Esthétique et théorie du roman [Aesthetic and theory of the novel]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergman, Brita, and Östen Dahl
1994 “Ideophones in Sign Language? The Place of Reduplication in the Tense–Aspect System of Swedish Sign Language.” In Tense, Aspect and Action. Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, ed. by Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll, and Carl-Erik Lindberg, 397–422. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beukeleers, Inez
2020 “On the Role of Eye Gaze in Flemish Sign Language: a Multifocal Eye-Tracking Study on the Phenomena of Online Turn Processing and Depicting.” PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
Beukeleers, Inez, and Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022 “Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction.” Frontiers in Psychology 131: 808814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buyn, Kang-Suk, Connie de Vos, Anastasia Bradford, Ulrike Zeshan, and Stephen Levinson
2018 “First encounters: Repair Sequences in Cross-Signing”. Topics in Cognitive Science 101: 314–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori, and Alessio Di Renzo
2022 “Signed Languages: A Triangular Semiotic Dimension”. Frontiers in Psychology 121: 802911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Depicting as a Method of Communication”. Psychological Review 123(3): 324–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2003 “Two Ways to Reformulate: a Contrastive Analysis of Reformulation Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1069–1093. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, Christian
2000La LSF. Les Voies de l’Iconicité [French Sign Language. The paths of iconicity]. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2007 “Une manière de reformuler en langue des signes française [A way to reformulate in French Sign Language].” La linguistique 431: 117–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damián E., Lupyan, Gary, Christiansen, Morten H., and Monaghan, Padraic
2015 “Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1984Le dire et le dit [The saying and the said]. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Eshkol-Taravella, Iris, and Natalia Grabar
2018 “Reformulations: de l’étude outillée dans les corpus disponibles vers leur détection automatique [Reformulations: from the study of available corpora to their automatic detection].” Langages 2121: 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay, and Rolf P. Halvorsen
Ferrara, Lindsay, and Gabrielle Hodge
2018 “Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.” Frontiers in Psychology 91: 716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gülich, Elisabeth, and Thomas Kotschi
1983 “Les marqueurs de la reformulation paraphrastique [The markers of paraphrastic reformulation].” Cahiers de Linguistique Française 51: 305–351.Google Scholar
1987 “Les actes de reformulations dans la consultation. La dame de Caluire [The acts of reformulations in the consultation. The lady of Caluire ]”. In L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation [Analysis of verbal interactions. The lady of Caluire: A consultation], ed. by Pierre Bange, 15–81. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Tom., and Francine MacDougall
1999/2000 ‘“Chaining’ and Other Links: Making Connections between American Sign Language and English in Two Types of School Settings.” Visual Anthropology Review 15 (2): 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry
2017 “Composite Utterances in a Signed Language: Topic Constructions and Perspective-Taking in ASL.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 511–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques
1957L’instance de la lettre dans l’inconscient ou la raison depuis Freud [The instance of the letter in the unconscious or the reason since Freud]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Manrique, Elizabeth
2016 “Other-Initiated Repair in Argentine Sign Language.” Open Linguistics 21: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinot, Claire
2010 “Reformulation et acquisition de la complexité linguistique [Reformulation and acquisition of linguistic complexity].” Travaux de linguistique (2): 63–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie
1995 “Constructed Dialogue and Constructed Action in American Sign Language.” In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, ed. by Ceil Lucas, 255–271. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Meurant, Laurence
2008Le regard en langue des signes. Anaphore en langue des signes de Belgique francophone (LSFB). Morphologie, syntaxe, énonciation [The gaze in sign language. Anaphora in French-speaking Belgian sign language (LSFB). Morphology, syntax, enunciation]. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
2015Corpus LSFB. First digital open access corpus of movies and annotations of French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB). University of Namur, LSFB-Lab. URL: [URL]
Meurant, Laurence, and Aurélie Sinte
2016 “La reformulation en Langue des signes de Belgique francophone (LSFB). Narration, explication, conversation [Reformulation in French Belgian sign language (LSFB). Narration, explanation, conversation].” L’Information grammaticale 1491: 32–44.Google Scholar
Meurant, Laurence, Aurélie Sinte, and Sílvia Gabarró-López
Murillo, Silvia
2016 “Sobre la reformulación y sus marcadores [On reformulation and its markers].” Cuadernos AISPI: Estudios de lenguas y literaturas hispánicas 81: 237–258.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Anna-Lena
2004 “Form and Discourse Function of the Pointing Toward the Chest in Swedish Sign Language.” Sign language & Linguistics 7 (1): 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1955Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna
2019 “Towards Understanding Nonmanuality: A Semiotic Treatment of signers’ head movements.” Glossa 41: 39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David
2007 “Can Constructed Action be Considered Obligatory?Lingua 117 (7): 1285–1314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David, and Wanette Reynolds
2012 “ASL Discourse Strategies: Chaining and Connecting–Explaining Across Audiences.” Sign Language Studies 12 (2): 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabatel, Alain
2010Les reformulations pluri-sémiotiques en contexte de formation [Multi-semiotic reformulations in educational contexts]. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
2017 “Frontières supra-catégorielles, catégorielles, infra-et trans-catégorielles de la reformulation [Supra-categorical, categorical, infra-and trans-categorical boundaries of reformulation].” Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Limbi şi literaturi romanice 21 (1): 65–103.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy
1987 “Complétude interactive et connecteurs reformulatifs [Interactive completeness and reformulative connectors].” Cahiers de linguistique française 81: 111–140.Google Scholar
Sallandre, Marie-Anne
2007 “Simultaneity in French Sign Language discourse.” In Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and function, ed. by Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson, and Onno Crasborn, 103–125. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ursi, Biagio, Carole Etienne, Florence Oloff, Lorenza Mondada, and Véronique Traverso
2018 “Diversité des répétitions et des reformulations dans les interactions orales: défis analytiques et conception d’un outil de détection automatique [Diversity of repetitions and reformulations in oral interactions: analytical issues and design of an automatic detection tool].” Langages 2121: 87–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2022 “Making Referents Seen and Heard Across Signed and Spoken Languages: Documenting and Interpreting Cross-Modal Differences in the Use of Enactment.” Frontiers in Psychology 131: 784339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam
2006 “Past and Current Trends in Sign Language Research.” Language & Communication 261: 168–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann, and Han Sloetjes
2006 “ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006, ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Aldo Gangemi, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, and Daniel Tapias, 1556–1559. Genoa: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar