Article published In:
CommitmentEdited by Philippe De Brabanter and Patrick Dendale
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22] 2008
► pp. 197–219
Edited by Philippe De Brabanter and Patrick Dendale
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22] 2008
► pp. 197–219
Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach
This paper proposes a cognitive-pragmatic alternative to the traditional, speech-acttheoretic, account of the notion of commitment. The perspective adopted here questions the relevance of addressing actual commitment as a speaker category and shifts the focus of the discussion from properties of speaker commitment to processes ofcommitment attribution. Using a relevance-theoretic framework, it will be suggested that inferring commitment in ordinary, cooperative, communication is part of the processes by which hearers derive speaker meaning, and that the degree of reliability that a hearer may expect to attain in attributing commitment to a speaker correlates with the degree of certainty associated to the derivation of explicatures and implicatures from an utterance.
Cited by (51)
Cited by 51 other publications
Schumann, Jennifer & Steve Oswald
2024. Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Bonalumi, Francesca, Feride Belma Bumin, Thom Scott-Phillips & Christophe Heintz
2023. Communication and deniability: Moral and epistemic reactions to denials. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Bonalumi, Francesca, Johannes B. Mahr, Pauline Marie & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
2023. Beyond the Implicit/Explicit Dichotomy: The Pragmatics of Plausible Deniability. Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Boulat, Kira & Didier Maillat
2023. Strength is relevant: experimental evidence of strength as a marker of commitment. Frontiers in Communication 8
Garmendia, Joana
2023. Lies we don't say: Figurative language, commitment, and deniability. Journal of Pragmatics 218 ► pp. 183 ff.
Masia, Viviana, Davide Garassino, Nicola Brocca & Louis de Saussure
Mohammed, Dima
2023. Argument by Association: On the Transmissibility of Commitment in Public Political Arguments. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 625 ff.
Oswald, Steve
2022. Insinuation is committing. Journal of Pragmatics 198 ► pp. 158 ff.
Oswald, Steve
2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 144 ff.
Rihs, Alain
2022.
Paris-Brest de Tanguy Viel. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 57:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Yuan, Wen & Siqi Lyu
2022. Speech act matters: Commitment to what's said or what's implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 128 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those Are Your Words, not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 99 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé
2021. Microaggression or misunderstanding? Implicatures, inferences and accountability. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 37 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé
2021. Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 48 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé
2024. Pragmatic Inference,
Reins, Louisa M. & Alex Wiegmann
2021. Is Lying Bound to Commitment? Empirically Investigating Deceptive Presuppositions, Implicatures, and Actions. Cognitive Science 45:2
BONALUMI, FRANCESCA, THOM SCOTT-PHILLIPS, JULIUS TACHA & CHRISTOPHE HEINTZ
2020. Commitment and communication: Are we committed to what we mean, or what we say?. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 360 ff.
Franke, Michael, Giulio Dulcinati & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
2020. Strategies of Deception: Under‐Informativity, Uninformativity, and Lies—Misleading With Different Kinds of Implicature. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 583 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli & Andrea Rocci
de Saussure, Louis & Tim Wharton
2019. La notion de pertinence au défi des effets émotionnels. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :35
Oswald, Steve & Alain Rihs
2019. De l’épistémique au déontique : un usage du conditionnel en contexte argumentatif. Langue française N° 200:4 ► pp. 135 ff.
Romero Alonso, John Ricardo, Vladimir Andres Espitia Zambrano, Miguel David Romero Di Biasi, Fabian Aristo Galindo Alonso, Jhon Jairo Lopez Oviedo & Edgar Leonardo Gomez Gomez
2019. 2019 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), ► pp. 1 ff.
Schumann, Jennifer, Sandrine Zufferey & Steve Oswald
2019. What makes a straw man acceptable? Three experiments assessing linguistic factors. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cornillie, Bert
2018. On speaker commitment and speaker involvement. Evidence from evidentials in Spanish talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 128 ► pp. 161 ff.
Hess, Leopold
2018. Perspectival expressives. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 13 ff.
Hess, Leopold
2021. Slurs and Expressive Commitments. Acta Analytica 36:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck & Hugo Mercier
2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of Pragmatics 133 ► pp. 15 ff.
Ricci, Claudia & Corinne Rossari
2018. Commitment phenomena through the study of evidential markers in Romance languages. Journal of Pragmatics 128 ► pp. 98 ff.
Dynel, Marta & Piotr Cap
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Communicative Intentions and Commitments. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14], ► pp. 35 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Establishing Commitments Between Ambiguity and Misquotation. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14], ► pp. 65 ff.
Vullioud, Colin, Fabrice Clément, Thom Scott-Phillips & Hugo Mercier
2017. Confidence as an expression of commitment: why misplaced expressions of confidence backfire. Evolution and Human Behavior 38:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Drai, Nathanaël & Louis de Saussure
2016. Quand l’implicite devient explicite : d’un accident expérimental à une étude pilote. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 17:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2016. The “exaptation” of linguistic implicit strategies. SpringerPlus 5:1
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2019. Topics are (implicit) indirect reports. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 19], ► pp. 149 ff.
Boulat, Kira
2015. Hearer-oriented processes of strength assignment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29 ► pp. 19 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
Meibauer, Jörg
2023. On commitment to untruthful implicatures. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2013. Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 48:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin & Steve Oswald
2013. When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account. Journal of Pragmatics 59 ► pp. 164 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2012. Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions. Argumentation 26:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2018. Assessing relevance. Lingua 210-211 ► pp. 42 ff.
Pietrandrea, Paola
2012. The conceptual structure of irreality: a focus on non-exclusion-of-factuality as a conceptual and a linguistic category. Language Sciences 34:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
de Saussure, Louis
2011. Discourse analysis, cognition and evidentials. Discourse Studies 13:6 ► pp. 781 ff.
de Saussure, Louis
2012. Modalité épistémique, évidentialité et dépendance contextuelle. Langue française n°173:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
de Saussure, Louis
2018. The Straw Man Fallacy as a Prestige-Gaining Device. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 171 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2011. Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation. Argumentation 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
KhosraviNik, Majid
2010. Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups 1. Critical Discourse Studies 7:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.