Article published In:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit ContentsEdited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 97–118
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 97–118
A truth that’s told with bad intent
Lying and implicit content
In recent years, a lively debate has emerged about the question of correctly defining lying. Two strands of argumentation have evolved in the philosophy of language: First, the idea that lying is not necessarily connected to an intention of the speaker to deceive the hearer (e.g., Carson 2010); second, the idea that there is a fundamental distinction between lying and mere misleading (e.g., Saul 2012). This paper deals with both assumptions from the vantage point of the semantics-pragmatics interface and relates them to the question of how it is possible to lie while drawing on implicit content of an utterance. It is argued that lying necessarily involves an intention to deceive and that many cases of misleading are either cases of misunderstanding or cases of untruthful implicature (Meibauer 2014a).
References
Adler, Jonathan E
1997 “Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating”. The Journal of Philosophy XCIV1: 435–452. 
Alston, William P
2000 Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Biland, Claudine, Py, J., Allione, Julien, Demarchi, Samuel, and Abric, Jean-Claud
2008 “The effect of lying on intentional versus unintentional facial expressions / L’effet du mensonge sur les expressions intentionnelles versus non intentionnelles du visage”. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 581: 65–73.
Burton-Roberts, Noel
2010 “Cancellation and Intention”. In Explicit Communication. Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by B. Soria & E. Romero, 138–155. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2013 “On Grice and cancellation”. Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 17–28.
Camp, Elizabeth
2006 “Contextualism, metaphor, and what-is-said”. Mind & Language 21 (3): 280–309.
Capone, Alessandro
2009 “Are Explicatures Cancellable? Toward a Theory of the Speaker’s Intentionality”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1): 55–83.
Carson, Thomas L
2010 Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carston, Robyn
2002 Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cole, Shirley A.N
1996 “Semantic Prototypes and the Pragmatics of Lie Across Cultures”. The LACUS Forum 231: 475–483
Coleman, Linda and Paul Kay
1981 “Prototype Semantics: The English Verb lie”. Language 571: 26–44.
De Brabanter, Philippe & Dendale, Patrick
Dynel, Marta
2011 “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics 3 (2): 137–165.
Falkenberg, Gabriel
1982 Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Fallis, Don
2009 “What is lying?” Journal of Philosophy 1061: 29–56.
2011 “Lying and Deception”. Philosopher’s Imprint 101: 1–22
2013 “Are Bald-Faced Lies Deceptive After All?” Available at SSRN (Social Science Research Network). [[URL]]
Faulkner, Paul
2007 “What is wrong with Lying?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 751: 525–547.
Fricker, Elizabeth
2012 “Stating and Insinuating”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXXVI1: 61–94.
Green, Stuart P
2006 Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grice, Henry P
1989a “Logic and Conversation”. In Henry P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
1989b “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation”. In P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Gupta, Swati, Kayo Sakamoto, and Andrew Ortony
2012 “Telling it like it isn’t – a comprehensive approach to analyzing verbal deception”. In The goals of cognition. Festschrift for Cristiano Castelfranchi, ed. by Fabio Paglierie, Luca Tummolini, Rino Falcone, and Maria Miceli, 579–612. London: College Publications.
Hardin, Karol J
2010 “The Spanish notion of Lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 3199–3213.
Harnish, Robert M
2005 “Commitment and speech act”. Philosophica 751: 11–41.
Jary, Mark
2010 Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M
2009 “Cancellability and the primary/secondary meaning distinction”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (3): 259–289.
Kissine, Mikhail
2013 From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lackey, Jennifer
2013 “Lies and deception: an unhappy divorce”. Analysis 73 (2): 236–248.
Levinson, Stephen. C
2000 Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mahon, James. E
2007 “A Definition of Deceiving”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 211: 181–194.
Mayol, Laia, and Elena Castroviejo
2013 “How to cancel an implicature”. Journal of Pragmatics 501: 84–104.
Meibauer, Jörg
2005 “Lying and falsely implicating”. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1373–1399.
2011 “On lying: intentionality, implicature, and imprecision”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 277–292.
2013a “Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie”. Linguistische Berichte 2351: 267–292.
2013b “Satztypen und Pragmatik”. In Satztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach, and Hans Altmann, 711–736. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.
2014a Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton(Mouton Series in Pragmatics, 14).
2014b “Bald-faced lies as acts of verbal aggression”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (1): 127–150.
Moeschler, Jacques
2013 “Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment?” Journal of Pragmatics 481: 84–97.
Mooney, Annabelle
2004 “Co-operation, violation and making sense”. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 899–920.
Morency, Patrick, Oswald, Steve, & de Saussure, Louis
2008 “Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 221: 197–220.
Reboul, Anne
1994 “The description of lies in speech act theory”. In Pretending to Communicate, ed. by Herman Parret, 292–298. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Saul, Jennifer
2012 Lying, Misleading, and What is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schlesinger, Izchak. M., and Sharon Hurvitz
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001 Rationality in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sorensen, Roy
2007 “Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 881: 251–264.
2010 “Knowledge-Lies”. Analysis 70 (4): 608–615.
Staffel, Julia
2011 “Reply to Sorensen, ‘Knowledge-Lies’”. Analysis 71 (2): 300–302.
Stokke, Andreas
2013a “Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading”. Philosophy Compass 81: 348–359.
2013b “Lying and Asserting”. Journal of Philosophy, CX (1): 33–60.
2013c “Saying too Little and Saying too Much. Critical Notice of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said by Jennifer Saul“. Disputatio V (35): 81–91.
Terkourafi, Marina
2010 “What-is-Said From Different Points of View”. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/81: 705–718.
Vincent, Jocelyne M. and Cristiano Castelfranchi
1981 “On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth”. In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà, and Jef Verschueren, 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Weiner, Matthew
2006 “Are all conversational implicatures cancellable?” Analysis661: 127–130.
Wendler, Axel and Helmut Hoffmann
2009 Technik und Taktik der Befragung im Gerichtsverfahren. Urteile begründen, Urteile prüfen. Lüge und Irrtum aufdecken. Stuttgart: Kohl-hammer.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 209 ff. 
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those Are Your Words, not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 99 ff.
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2021. Lying vs. misleading: The adverbial account. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2023. Lying versus misleading, with language and pictures: the adverbial account. Linguistics and Philosophy 46:3 ► pp. 509 ff.
Garmendia, Joana
2023. Lies we don't say: Figurative language, commitment, and deniability. Journal of Pragmatics 218 ► pp. 183 ff.
Gaszczyk, Grzegorz & Aleksandra Krogulska
2024. Lying by explaining: an experimental study. Synthese 203:3
Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Marta
2017. Lying and Misleading within the Philosophy of Language: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :26/2 ► pp. 79 ff.
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck & Hugo Mercier
2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of Pragmatics 133 ► pp. 15 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
2015. Konzepte des Lügens. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1
Meibauer, Jörg
2018. The Linguistics of Lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 357 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
2023. On commitment to untruthful implicatures. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Mubashra, Saima & Ghazala Kausar
2023. The Truth About Mendacity: The Role of Deception Motives in Perception of Deceptive Communication in Pakistan. SAGE Open 13:4
Oswald, Steve
2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 144 ff.
Reins, Louisa M. & Alex Wiegmann
2021. Is Lying Bound to Commitment? Empirically Investigating Deceptive Presuppositions, Implicatures, and Actions. Cognitive Science 45:2
Scott, Kate
2023. “Deceptive” clickbait headlines: Relevance, intentions, and lies. Journal of Pragmatics 218 ► pp. 71 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.