Cover not available
Article published In:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 97–118

A truth that’s told with bad intent

Lying and implicit content

| Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

In recent years, a lively debate has emerged about the question of correctly defining lying. Two strands of argumentation have evolved in the philosophy of language: First, the idea that lying is not necessarily connected to an intention of the speaker to deceive the hearer (e.g., Carson 2010); second, the idea that there is a fundamental distinction between lying and mere misleading (e.g., Saul 2012). This paper deals with both assumptions from the vantage point of the semantics-pragmatics interface and relates them to the question of how it is possible to lie while drawing on implicit content of an utterance. It is argued that lying necessarily involves an intention to deceive and that many cases of misleading are either cases of misunderstanding or cases of untruthful implicature (Meibauer 2014a).

Published online: 28 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.28.05mei
References
Adler, Jonathan E
1997 “Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating”. The Journal of Philosophy XCIV1: 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P
2000 Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biland, Claudine, Py, J., Allione, Julien, Demarchi, Samuel, and Abric, Jean-Claud
2008 “The effect of lying on intentional versus unintentional facial expressions / L’effet du mensonge sur les expressions intentionnelles versus non intentionnelles du visage”. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 581: 65–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
2010 “Cancellation and Intention”. In Explicit Communication. Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by B. Soria & E. Romero, 138–155. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “On Grice and cancellation”. Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth
2006 “Contextualism, metaphor, and what-is-said”. Mind & Language 21 (3): 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2009 “Are Explicatures Cancellable? Toward a Theory of the Speaker’s Intentionality”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1): 55–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carson, Thomas L
2010 Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002 Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Shirley A.N
1996 “Semantic Prototypes and the Pragmatics of Lie Across Cultures”. The LACUS Forum 231: 475–483Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda and Paul Kay
1981 “Prototype Semantics: The English Verb lie”. Language 571: 26–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe & Dendale, Patrick
2008 “Commitment: The Term and the Notions”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 221: 1–14 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2011 “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics 3 (2): 137–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falkenberg, Gabriel
1982 Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don
2009 “What is lying?” Journal of Philosophy 1061: 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Lying and Deception”. Philosopher’s Imprint 101: 1–22Google Scholar
2013 “Are Bald-Faced Lies Deceptive After All?” Available at SSRN (Social Science Research Network). [[URL]] DOI logo
Faulkner, Paul
2007 “What is wrong with Lying?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 751: 525–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth
2012 “Stating and Insinuating”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXXVI1: 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Stuart P
2006 Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Henry P
1989a “Logic and Conversation”. In Henry P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1989b “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation”. In P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Swati, Kayo Sakamoto, and Andrew Ortony
2012 “Telling it like it isn’t – a comprehensive approach to analyzing verbal deception”. In The goals of cognition. Festschrift for Cristiano Castelfranchi, ed. by Fabio Paglierie, Luca Tummolini, Rino Falcone, and Maria Miceli, 579–612. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Hardin, Karol J
2010 “The Spanish notion of Lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 3199–3213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnish, Robert M
2005 “Commitment and speech act”. Philosophica 751: 11–41.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
2010 Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M
2009 “Cancellability and the primary/secondary meaning distinction”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (3): 259–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2013 From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer
2013 “Lies and deception: an unhappy divorce”. Analysis 73 (2): 236–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. C
2000 Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, James. E
2007 “A Definition of Deceiving”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 211: 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The definition of lying and deception”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [[URL]]Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia, and Elena Castroviejo
2013 “How to cancel an implicature”. Journal of Pragmatics 501: 84–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2005 “Lying and falsely implicating”. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1373–1399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “On lying: intentionality, implicature, and imprecision”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a “Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie”. Linguistische Berichte 2351: 267–292.Google Scholar
2013b “Satztypen und Pragmatik”. In Satztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach, and Hans Altmann, 711–736. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton(Mouton Series in Pragmatics, 14). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b “Bald-faced lies as acts of verbal aggression”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (1): 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2013 “Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment?” Journal of Pragmatics 481: 84–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle
2004 “Co-operation, violation and making sense”. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 899–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morency, Patrick, Oswald, Steve, & de Saussure, Louis
2008 “Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 221: 197–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reboul, Anne
1994 “The description of lies in speech act theory”. In Pretending to Communicate, ed. by Herman Parret, 292–298. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer
2012 Lying, Misleading, and What is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Izchak. M., and Sharon Hurvitz
2008 “The structure of misunderstandings”. Pragmatics & Cognition 16 (3): 568–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Rationality in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy
2007 “Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 881: 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Knowledge-Lies”. Analysis 70 (4): 608–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staffel, Julia
2011 “Reply to Sorensen, ‘Knowledge-Lies’”. Analysis 71 (2): 300–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas
2013a “Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading”. Philosophy Compass 81: 348–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “Lying and Asserting”. Journal of Philosophy, CX (1): 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013c “Saying too Little and Saying too Much. Critical Notice of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said by Jennifer Saul“. Disputatio V (35): 81–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2010 “What-is-Said From Different Points of View”. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/81: 705–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Jocelyne M. and Cristiano Castelfranchi
1981 “On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth”. In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà, and Jef Verschueren, 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Matthew
2006 “Are all conversational implicatures cancellable?” Analysis661: 127–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wendler, Axel and Helmut Hoffmann
2009 Technik und Taktik der Befragung im Gerichtsverfahren. Urteile begründen, Urteile prüfen. Lüge und Irrtum aufdecken. Stuttgart: Kohl-hammer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those Are Your Words, not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2021. Lying vs. misleading: The adverbial account. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:3 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2023. Lying versus misleading, with language and pictures: the adverbial account. Linguistics and Philosophy 46:3 ► pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Marta
2017. Lying and Misleading within the Philosophy of Language: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :26/2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck & Hugo Mercier
2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of Pragmatics 133 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2015. Konzepte des Lügens. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Aspects of a theory of bullshit. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1 DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2018. The Linguistics of Lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2023. On commitment to untruthful implicatures. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Oswald, Steve
2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Reins, Louisa M. & Alex Wiegmann
2021. Is Lying Bound to Commitment? Empirically Investigating Deceptive Presuppositions, Implicatures, and Actions. Cognitive Science 45:2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Manipulative Disguise of Truth [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 322], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.