Article published in:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 97118


Adler, Jonathan E.
1997 “Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating”. The Journal of Philosophy XCIV: 435–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P.
2000Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biland, Claudine, Py, J., Allione, Julien, Demarchi, Samuel, and Abric, Jean-Claud
2008 “The effect of lying on intentional versus unintentional facial expressions / L’effet du mensonge sur les expressions intentionnelles versus non intentionnelles du visage”. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 58: 65–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
2010 “Cancellation and Intention”. In Explicit Communication. Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by B. Soria & E. Romero, 138–155. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2013 “On Grice and cancellation”. Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 17–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth
2006 “Contextualism, metaphor, and what-is-said”. Mind & Language 21 (3): 280–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2009 “Are Explicatures Cancellable? Toward a Theory of the Speaker’s Intentionality”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1): 55–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Thomas L.
2010Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Shirley A.N.
1996 “Semantic Prototypes and the Pragmatics of Lie Across Cultures”. The LACUS Forum 23: 475–483Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda and Paul Kay
1981 “Prototype Semantics: The English Verb lie. Language 57: 26–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Brabanter, Philippe & Dendale, Patrick
2008 “Commitment: The Term and the Notions”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 1–14 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2011 “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics 3 (2): 137–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falkenberg, Gabriel
1982Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fallis, Don
2009 “What is lying?Journal of Philosophy 106: 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Lying and Deception”. Philosopher’s Imprint 10: 1–22Google Scholar
2013 “Are Bald-Faced Lies Deceptive After All?” Available at SSRN (Social Science Research Network). [http://​ssrn​.com​/abstract​=2250050]
Faulkner, Paul
2007 “What is wrong with Lying?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 525–547. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth
2012 “Stating and Insinuating”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXXVI: 61–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Stuart P.
2006Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Henry P.
1989a “Logic and Conversation”. In Henry P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1989b “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation”. In P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Swati, Kayo Sakamoto, and Andrew Ortony
2012“Telling it like it isn’t – a comprehensive approach to analyzing verbal deception”. In The goals of cognition. Festschrift for Cristiano Castelfranchi, ed. by Fabio Paglierie, Luca Tummolini, Rino Falcone, and Maria Miceli, 579–612. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Hardin, Karol J.
2010 “The Spanish notion of Lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay”. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3199–3213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnish, Robert M.
2005 “Commitment and speech act”. Philosophica 75: 11–41.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
2010Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.
2009 “Cancellability and the primary/secondary meaning distinction”. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (3): 259–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2013From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer
2013 “Lies and deception: an unhappy divorce”. Analysis 73 (2): 236–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. C.
2000Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, James. E.
2007 “A Definition of Deceiving”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 181–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “The definition of lying and deception”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/lying​-definition/]Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia, and Elena Castroviejo
2013 “How to cancel an implicature”. Journal of Pragmatics 50: 84–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2005 “Lying and falsely implicating”. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “On lying: intentionality, implicature, and imprecision”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 277–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a“Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie”. Linguistische Berichte 235: 267–292.Google Scholar
2013b“Satztypen und Pragmatik”. In Satztypen des Deutschen, ed. by Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach, and Hans Altmann, 711–736. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014aLying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton(Mouton Series in Pragmatics, 14). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “Bald-faced lies as acts of verbal aggression”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (1): 127–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2013 “Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment?Journal of Pragmatics 48: 84–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle
2004 “Co-operation, violation and making sense”. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 899–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morency, Patrick, Oswald, Steve, & de Saussure, Louis
2008 “Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 197–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reboul, Anne
1994“The description of lies in speech act theory”. In Pretending to Communicate, ed. by Herman Parret, 292–298. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer
2012Lying, Misleading, and What is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Izchak. M., and Sharon Hurvitz
2008 “The structure of misunderstandings”. Pragmatics & Cognition 16 (3): 568–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Rationality in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy
2007 “Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88: 251–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Knowledge-Lies”. Analysis 70 (4): 608–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staffel, Julia
2011 “Reply to Sorensen, ‘Knowledge-Lies’”. Analysis 71 (2): 300–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas
2013a “Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading”. Philosophy Compass 8: 348–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Lying and Asserting”. Journal of Philosophy, CX (1): 33–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013c “Saying too Little and Saying too Much. Critical Notice of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said by Jennifer Saul“. Disputatio V (35): 81–91.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2010 “What-is-Said From Different Points of View”. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/8: 705–718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Jocelyne M. and Cristiano Castelfranchi
1981 “On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth”. In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà, and Jef Verschueren, 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Matthew
2006 “Are all conversational implicatures cancellable?Analysis66: 127–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wendler, Axel and Helmut Hoffmann
2009Technik und Taktik der Befragung im Gerichtsverfahren. Urteile begründen, Urteile prüfen. Lüge und Irrtum aufdecken. Stuttgart: Kohl-hammer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Manipulative Disguise of Truth [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 322], Crossref logo
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021.  In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2021. Lying vs. misleading: The adverbial account. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:3  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo
Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Marta
2017. Lying and Misleading within the Philosophy of Language: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :26/2  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck & Hugo Mercier
2018. Saying, presupposing and implicating: How pragmatics modulates commitment. Journal of Pragmatics 133  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2015. Konzepte des Lügens. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34:2  pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Aspects of a theory of bullshit. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1 Crossref logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2018. The Linguistics of Lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1  pp. 357 ff. Crossref logo
Reins, Louisa M. & Alex Wiegmann
2021. Is Lying Bound to Commitment? Empirically Investigating Deceptive Presuppositions, Implicatures, and Actions. Cognitive Science 45:2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.