References

References

Benati, A.
(2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research 5, 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207–255). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004b) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness, 13, 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Classroom-oriented research: Processing Instruction. Language Teaching, 52(3), 343–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J.
(2008) Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiucchiu, G., & Benati, A.
(2020) The effects of structured input and textual enhancement on the acquisition of Italian subjunctive: A self-paced reading study. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 4, 235–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farhat, A., & Benati, A.
(2018) The effects of motivation and processing instruction in the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2, 60–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farley, A. P.
(2001a) The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 57–94.Google Scholar
(2001b) Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farley, A.
(2004a) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004b) Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (227–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2005) Structured input: Grammar instruction for the acquisition-oriented classroom. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Benati, A.
(2007a) Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. Equinox.Google Scholar
(2007b) Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems and possible solutions. Continuum.Google Scholar
(2009) Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & VanPatten, B.
(1995) Making communicative language teaching happen. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
(2003) Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Mountaki, Y.
(2016) The relative effects of processing instruction and traditional output instruction on the acquisition of the Arabic subjunctive. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of South Florida.
VanPatten, B.
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Ablex.Google Scholar
(2004) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115–135). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015b) Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 53(2), 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.
(2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (33–63). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2005) Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar