Chapter in:
Understanding L2 Proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigations
Edited by Eun Hee Jeon and Yo In'nami
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 13] 2022
► pp. 87–107

Chapter 4
L2 writing

Theory and research

| Radboud University , Nijmegen
This chapter aims to identify sources of individual differences in writing proficiency, and ways to measure these differences. The construct of writing proficiency is delineated and embedded in cognitive approaches to writing research. It is considered to be a multi-faceted construct, which implies that various component skills contribute to the quality of the eventual writing performance. Writing in a second language often builds on L1 writing skills and procedures, but also raises its own questions, such as the role of transfer of (metacognitive) knowledge, and the writer’s strength and weaknesses in the target language. The best way to assess a language learner’s writing proficiency very much depends on the assessment purposes, and can range from a focused measurement of subskills with discrete-point tests, for diagnostic purposes, to a general performance assessment with holistic rating, for admission purposes. A number of characteristics of these measurements are discussed in the second part of this chapter.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Defining (L2) writing proficiency
  • 3.Sources of individual differences in cognitive models of writing
  • 4.Process-product
  • 5.L1-L2-FL
  • 6.Measuring writing proficiency
  • 7.Future (L2) writing and research
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.13.04sch
References
Alderson, J. C., Huhta, A., & Nieminen, L.
(2016) Characteristics of weak and strong readers in a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (4), 853–879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, A.
(2006) A review of writing model research based on cognitive processes. In A. Horning & A. Becker (Eds.), Revision: History, theory, and practice (pp. 25–49). Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
(1987) The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1991) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J.
(2004) The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111 (4), 1061–1071. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
(1994) Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12 (2), 103–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R.
(2001) Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18 (1), 80–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J.
(1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12 (11), 671–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1961) Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Harper & Row and John Weatherhill.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. S.
(2014) What is successful writing? An investigation into the multiple ways writers can write successful essays. Written Communication, 31 (2), 184–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(2016) Theoretical orientations to L2 writing. In R. M. Manchon & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 65–88). Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, J.
(2008) Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill (ETS Research Report Series, RR-08-55). ETS.Google Scholar
Fayol, M.
(2016) From language to text. The development and learning of translation. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 130–143). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J.
(1986) Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37 (1), 16–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frangou, S. M., Ruokamo, H., Parviainen, T., & Wikgren, J.
(2018) Can you put your finger on it? The effects of writing modality on Finnish students’ recollection. Writing Systems Research, 10 (2), 82–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gebril, A.
(2009) Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? Language Testing, 26 (4), 507–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E.
(1986) Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7 (1), 6–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B.
(1996) Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Longman.Google Scholar
Grabowski, J.
(1996) Writing and speaking: Common grounds and differences toward a regulation theory of written language production. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 73–91). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S.
(1995) Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (2), 230–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X.
(2017) Explicit knowledge of the Spanish subjunctive and accurate use in discrete-point, oral production, and written production measures. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 20 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R.
(2012) Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29 (3), 369–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S.
(1980) Identifying the organisation of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Nash, J. G.
(1996) On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29–55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B.
(1981) Testing ESL composition: a practical approach. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D.
(2017) Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37 , 13–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C.
(1988) Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 437–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A.
(2013) Working memory in written composition: A progress report. Journal of Writing Research, 5 (2), 159–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-H.
(2011) Diagnosing EAP writing ability using the reduced reparameterized unified model. Language Testing, 28 (4), 509–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C.
(2018) The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): Version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50 (3), 1030–1046. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leggette, H. R., Rutherford, T., Dunsford, D., & Costello, L.
(2015) A review and evaluation of prominent theories of writing. Journal of Applied Communications, 99 (3), 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S.
(2016) Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 24–40). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M.
(2010) Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27 (1), 57–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. F.
(1996) Measuring second language performance. Longman.Google Scholar
Murphy, L., & de Larios, J. R.
(2010) Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19 (2), 61–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J., & Murphy, L.
(2001) A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51 (3), 497–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, L., & Murphy, S.
(1988) Designing writing tasks for the assessment of writing. Ablex.Google Scholar
Santangelo, T., Harris, K., & Graham, S.
(2016) Self-regulation and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 174–193). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R.
(2011) How language ability is assessed. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 701–716). Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012) The validity and generalizability of writing scores: The effect of rater, task and language. In E. van Steendam, M. Tillema, G. Rijlaarsdam, & H. van den Bergh (Eds.), Measuring writing: Recent insights into theory, methodology and practice (pp. 1–22). Brill.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & Van Gelderen, A.
(2009) Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M.
(2003) First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & De Glopper, K.
(2006) Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 (3), 201–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sudweeks, R. R., Reeve, S., & Bradshaw, W. S.
(2004) A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing. Assessing Writing, 9 (3), 239–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, M.
(2016) Understanding planning in text production. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 72–87). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Troia, G. A., Shen, M., & Brandon, D. L.
(2019) Multidimensional levels of language writing measures in grades four to six. Written Communication, 36 (2), 231–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, B. D., & Fernández-Villanueva, M.
(2013) The role of previously learned languages in the thought processes of multilingual writers at the Deutsche Schule Barcelona. Research in the Teaching of English, 47 (4), 420–441.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van Steendam, E.
(2016) Writing process theory: A functional dynamic approach. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 57–71). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, S., & Berns, J.
(2018) Same difference? L1 influence in the use of initial adverbials in English novice writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56 (4), 427–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Victori, M.
(1999) An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27 (4), 537–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., & Wen, Q.
(2002) L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11 (3), 225–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S. C.
(2002) Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Validation of automated scores of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing ability. Language Testing, 27 (3), 335–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, K., & Ménard, N.
(1995) L1 and L2 writers’ strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing. Language Learning, 45 (3), 381–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, B. R.
(2002) Language-switching: Using the first language while writing in a second language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11 (1), 7–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Q.
(2017) Diagnosing university students’ academic writing in English: Is cognitive diagnostic modelling the way forward? Educational Psychology, 37 (1), 26–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R.
(1997) Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22 (1), 73–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar