Article published in:
Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 1740
References

References

Anderson, J. R.
(2010) Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishing.Google Scholar
Bolibaugh, C. & Foster, P.
(2013) Memory-based aptitude for native-like selection: The role of phonological short-term memory. In G. Granena & M. H. Long, (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 205–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.B.
(1965) The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, Research, and Education (pp. 87–136). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
(1973) Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
(1993) Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chan, E., Skehan, P., & Gong, G.
(2011) Working memory, phonemic coding ability and foreign language aptitude: Potential for construction of specific language aptitude tests—the case of Cantonese. Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English language, literatures and cultural studies, 60, 45–73.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V.
(1977) Psychology and Language. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
de Graaff, R.
(1997) The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Keyser, R.
(2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
(2007) Conclusion: The future of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 287–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B., & Romer, U.
(2013) Usage-Based Language: Investigating the Latent Structures That Underpin Acquisition. Language Learning 63, (Supp. 1), 25–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31–64). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015) Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani N.
(2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G.
(2013) Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M.
(2013a) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M.H.
(2013b) Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J., & Ehrman, M.
(2000) A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: the Canal-F theory and test, Modern Language Journal, 84, 390–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P.
(2008) Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 54, 703–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2015) The Associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J.A., Hughes, M.M., Campbell, S.G., Silbert, N.H., Tare, M., Jackson, S.R., Smith, B.K., Bunting, M.F., & Doughty, C.J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2001) The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) A unified model of language acquisition. In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P.
(2005) LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Lognostics: University of Swansea. www​.lognostics​.co​.uk​/tools​/llama
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P.
(1998) Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A.F. Healy & L.E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P.
(2013) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(1995) Learning simple and complex rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Aptitudes, abilities, contexts and practice. In R.M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language learning: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M.
(1996) Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence. Quantitative and qualitative analyses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1982) Memory and motivation in language aptitude testing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
(1986) Where does language aptitude come from? In P. Meara (Ed.), Spoken language (pp. 95–113). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Skehan P.
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2002) Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language aptitude. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381–395). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013a) Nurturing noticing. In J.M. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(2013b) Carroll, John B. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
(2014a) Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spadaro, K.
(2013) Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 43–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T.
(2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/ procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2012) Working memory and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.
(2014) On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M. B.
(1981) Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
(2008) Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Blake, John
2020.  In New Technological Applications for Foreign and Second Language Learning and Teaching [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cox, Jessica G., Julianna M. Lynch, Najee Mendes & ChengCheng Zhai
2019. On Bilingual Aptitude for Learning New Languages: The Roles of Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Individual Differences. Language Learning 69:2  pp. 478 ff. Crossref logo
Curcic, Maja, Sible Andringa & Folkert Kuiken
2019. The Role of Awareness and Cognitive Aptitudes in L2 Predictive Language Processing. Language Learning 69  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Ji Hyun
2019. The relative effect of recasts on L2 Korean learners’ accuracy development of two different forms and its relationship with language analytic ability. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216881985991 ff. Crossref logo
Kourtali, Nektaria‐Efstathia & Andrea Révész
2020. The Roles of Recasts, Task Complexity, and Aptitude in Child Second Language Development. Language Learning 70:1  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Robinson, Peter
2019.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2020. Investigating explicit and implicit L2 knowledge and learning: Replications of Erlam () and Roehr-Brackin and Tellier (). Language Teaching  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi
2019. Individualization of practice distribution in second language grammar learning. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi & Robert DeKeyser
2017. The Interface of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in a Second Language: Insights From Individual Differences in Cognitive Aptitudes. Language Learning 67:4  pp. 747 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi, Satoko Yokosawa & David Aline
2020. The role of working memory in blocked and interleaved grammar practice: Proceduralization of L2 syntax. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882091398 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.