Elicited imitation as a measure of implicit L2 knowledge
The role of working memory and short-term memory capacity
Elicited imitation (EI) is an oral production task considered to be conducive to the retrieval of implicit second language (L2) knowledge (e.g. Bley-Vroman & Chaudron 1994; Chaudron, Prior, & Kozok 2005; Ellis 2005; Erlam 2006). This study aimed at contributing to testing the validity of EI as a measure of implicit language knowledge by examining whether individual differences in working memory (WM) and/or short-term memory (STM) capacity are related to performance on an EI task. The study focused on two types of morpho-syntactic agreement: plural marking and third person subject-verb agreement in English. Sixty intermediate-level learners of English with Chinese as L1 background participated in the study. The results of the study showed that neither WM nor STM moderated accuracy scores on the EI task. These findings were interpreted as evidence of automatic knowledge retrieval during the task and, therefore, as evidence in support of the validity of EI as a measure of implicit language knowledge.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.EI and second language acquisition
- 3.The validity of EI
- 4.Purpose of the study
- 5.Research questions
- 6.Method
- 6.1Participants
- 6.2Target structures
- 6.3Instruments
- 6.3.1EI and true-false decision-making task
- 6.3.2Debriefing questionnaire
- 6.3.3WM test
- 6.3.4STM test
- 6.3.5Untimed written L2 measure
- 6.4Procedure
- 6.5Data scoring
- 7.Results
-
7.1Debriefing questionnaire: EI and awareness
- 8.Discussion
- 9.Conclusions and further research
-
Notes
-
References
References (43)
References
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K Spence & J Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2; pp. 89–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8; pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Barrett, L., Tugade, M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.
Blackwell, A., & Bates, E. (1995). Inducing agrammatic profiles in normals: Evidence for the selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 228–257.
Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bountress, N. (1977). Approximations of selected standard English sentences by speakers of black English. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 254–262.
Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.
Carrow, E. A. (1974). A test using elicited imitations in assessing grammatical structure in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39, 437–444.
Cedrus (2003). SuperLab 4.0.7. San Pedro, CA: Authors.
Chaudron, C., Prior, M., & Kozok, U. (2005). Elicited imitation as an oral proficiency measure. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Madison Wisconsin.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769–786
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
Eisenstein, M., Bailey, N., & Madden, C. (1982). It takes two: Contrasting tasks and contrasting structures. Tesol Quarterly, 16, 381–393.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
Engle, R. W., Nations, J. K., & Cantor, J. (1990). Is “working memory capacity” just another name for word knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 799–804.
Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135.
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1981). The interpretation of elicited imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31, 369–392.
Gass, S. (2001). Innovations in second language research methods. Annual Review ofApplied Linguistics, 21, 221–232.
Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (2007). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, C. R., Lonsdale, D., Kennington, C., Johnson, A., & McGhee, J. (2008). Elicited imitation as an oral proficiency measure with ASR scoring. Proceedings of the LREC (Language Resources and Evaluation) Conference. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from <[URL]>
Hamayan, E., Saegert, J., & Larudee, P. (1977). Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech, 20, 86–97.
Hameyer, K. (1980). Testing oral proficiency and elicited imitation. Revue de Phonetique Apliquee, 53, 11–24.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.
Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y. (2007). Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 215–238.
Kane, M.J., Hambrick, D.Z., Tuholski, S.W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T.W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The domain generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
Lee, L. L. (1971). The Northwestern Syntax Screening Test. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research. Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Markman, B., Spilka, I., & Tucker, G. (1975). The use of elicited imitation in search of an interim French grammar. Language Learning, 75, 31–41.
McDade, H., Simpson, M., & Lamb, D. (1982). The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 19–24.
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.
McDonald, J. L. (2008). Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 980–984.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy, & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning. Psycholinguistic studies in training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mizera, G. J. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research Methodology in Second-language Acquisition (pp. 227–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Naiman, N. (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 2, 1–37.
O’Grady, W. (2003). The radical middle: Nativism without Universal Grammar. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 43–62). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Slobin, D. I. & Welsh, C. A. (1973). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 485–497). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54–73.
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Erlam, Rosemary & Lan Wei
2024.
The importance of increased processing demands in the design of Elicited Imitation tests.
Language Teaching Research 28:4
► pp. 1472 ff.
Nikouee, Majid & Leila Ranta
2023.
Building an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge.
Instructed Second Language Acquisition 7:1
► pp. 41 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.