Cover not available
Part of
Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 249–277

Executive control and phonological processing in language acquisition

The role of early bilingual experience in learning an additional language

| Indiana University
| Universitat de Barcelona

This chapter discusses the relationship between cognitive control and phonological processing in a second language (L2). Cognitive control is globally referred to as executive functions, mainly consisting of attention control, working memory and inhibitory control. Our research examines how dealing with multiple languages early on relates to differences in cognitive abilities, and how individual differences in cognitive abilities in turn impact phonological processing in L2. Building on evidence that functional bilinguals develop fine-grained advantages in cognitive control over monolinguals (Bialystok 2011), we investigate whether language learners with greater cognitive control are also better equipped to acquire a new phonological system. We report on data from two groups of L2 learners (L1 Spanish) who started learning English during adolescence. One group of learners grew up in a Spanish monolingual environment; the other grew up in a bilingual environment (Spanish/Catalan). The early bilingual participants used both Catalan and Spanish daily, but differed in the amount of use of their less dominant language (either Catalan or Spanish). We measured attention control, phonological memory and inhibitory control, and assessed L2 phonological processing skills via a perception task. The results indicate that phonological short-term memory and inhibition are related to L2-phonological processing, but not in the same way for all groups. The relationship interacts with the participants’ linguistic profile. Specifically, inhibitory control strongly correlates with L2 phonological processing for the participants from the monolingual environment: participants with stronger inhibitory control were more accurate in the perception task. This relationship was not visible for the participants with bilingual experience. We propose that the effects of individual differences in inhibitory control for these bilinguals might have been “washed out” due to the daily practice they receive in inhibiting one language over the other.

Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants and learning contexts
    • 2.2Proficiency measure: X-Lex Y-Lex vocabulary task
    • 2.3Phonological processing task
      • 2.3.1L2 perception task
        • 2.3.1.1Materials and procedures
        • 2.3.1.2Results
    • 2.4Cognitive tasks
      • 2.4.1Inhibition
        • 2.4.1.1Materials and procedures
        • 2.4.1.2Results
      • 2.4.2Attention control
        • 2.4.2.1Materials and procedures
        • 2.4.2.2Results
      • 2.4.3Phonological short-term memory (PSTM)
        • 2.4.3.1Materials and procedures
        • 2.4.3.2Results
  • 3.Correlations
  • 4.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.12dar
References
Aliaga-Garcia, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E.
(2011) L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L.
(1994) Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D.
(2003) Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
(2007) Nonnative and second language speech perception. Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2011) Reshaping the mind: the benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65, 229–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M.
(2004) Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
(2011) Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerviño-Povedano, E., & Mora, J. C.
(2011) Investigating Catalan learners of English over-reliance on duration: vowel cue weighting and phonological short-term memory. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel & M. Kul (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010 (Vol. 1; pp. 53–64). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cohen, Dale J., Eckhardt, Christopher I., & Schagat, Klaus D.
(1998) Attention allocation and habituation to anger-related stimuli during a visual search task. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 399–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A. & Santesteban, M.
(2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 491–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I.
(2006) How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1057–1074.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Mora, J. C., & Daidone, D.
(2013) Phonological attention control, inhibition, and second language speech learning. Paper presented at New Sounds 2013 (International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech), 17–19 May 2013, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Darcy, I., Mora, J. C. & Daidone, D.
(2016) The role of inhibitory control in acquiring a new phonological system. Language Learning, 66, 1–33. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L.
(2015) Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1995) Second language speech learning. Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience. Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S.
(1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T.
(1997) Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S.
(1999) Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35, 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E.
(2007) Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.) Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D.
(2000) The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Højen, A., & Flege, J. E.
(2006) Early learners’ discrimination of second-language vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119 (5), 3072–3084. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I.
(2005) The sounds of Spanish. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jongman, S. R., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(2015) Sustained attention in language production: An individual differences investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 710–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lev-Ari, S., & Peperkamp, S.
(2013) Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals’ native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 320–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The influence of inhibitory skill on phonological representations in production and perception. Journal of Phonetics, 47, 36–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E.
(2001) The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E.
(1999) Phonological Short-term Memory and Foreign Language Learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. & Sharenborg, O.
(2014) Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: A comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors. Psychology and Aging, 29, 150–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. M., & Miralpeix, I.
(2006) D_Tools (Version 2.0; _lognostics: Tools for vocabulary researchers: lognostics) [Computer software]. University of Wales Swansea. Retrieved from [URL]> (30 March 2012).
Meara, P., & Milton, J.
(2003) X_Lex, The Swansea Levels Test. Newbury, UK: Express Publishing.Google Scholar
Miralpeix, I.
(2012) X_Lex and Y_Lex: A validation study. 22nd VARG Conference (Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group). Newtown, UK.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. & Friedman, N. P.
(1998) Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning. Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D.
(2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S.
(2003) Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C. & Darcy, I.
in press) The relationship between cognitive control and pronunciation in a second language. In Talia Isaacs and Pavel Trofimovich Eds. Second Language Pronunciation Assessment: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Multilingual Matters
Mora, J. C. & Gilabert, R.
(2012) Individual factors in utterance and perceived fluency: Some empirical issues. Invited presentation to the Workshop Fluent Speech, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 12–13 November.Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(1997) A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G.
(1995) Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 98–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisberg, D., Baron, J., & Kemler, D. G.
(1980) Overcoming Stroop interference: The effects of practice on distractor potency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 140–150.Google Scholar
Safronova, E., & Mora, J. C.
(2013) Attention control in L2 phonological acquisition. In A. Llanes Baró, L. Astrid Ciro, L. Gallego Balsà, & R. M. Mateus Serra (Eds.), Applied linguistics in the age of globalization (pp. 109–114). Lleida: Edicions de la Universitat de Lleida.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2005) Cross-Language Speech Perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 546–566). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N.
(1997) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In A. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 85–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S.
(2005) Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: attention-shifting and second language proficiency. Memory and Cognition, 33, 644–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Service, E.
(1992) Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A. Human experimental psychology, 45A, 21–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Watson, F. L.
(1998) The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60 (6), 993–1003. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Daidone, Danielle & Isabelle Darcy
2021. Vocabulary Size Is a Key Factor in Predicting Second Language Lexical Encoding Accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Oliveira, Diana & Anabela Rato
2019. Assimilação percetiva das oclusivas orais do português europeu L2 por falantes nativos de cantonês . Diacrítica 32:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.