Cover not available
Part of
L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, new developments and implications
Edited by Tanja Angelovska and Angela Hahn
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 5] 2017
► pp. 253–275

Chapter 11
Input Processing and Processing Instruction

Pedagogical and cognitive considerations for L3 acquisition

Input Processing refers to the initial process by which learners connect grammatical forms with their meanings as well as how they interpret the roles of nouns in relationship to verbs. The pedagogical intervention derived from this theoretical framework, Processing Instruction (PI), has consistently shown success at improving second language (L2) learners’ processing strategies. PI helps learners to intake “better input” by directing their attention to targeted forms during input processing and to assign grammatical and semantic roles. Although previous findings reveal that PI is an effective pedagogy in L2 learning, in this chapter we explore whether similar benefits would hold for third language (L3) learning. Through considerations related to the complimentary and competitive nature of first languages (L1s) and L2s, along with insight from cognitive bilingualism, we advocate for future studies to test the hypotheses discussed in this chapter.
Keywords: processing instruction, input processing, L3 learning, cognitive bilingualism
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • What is Input Processing?
    • What is Processing Instruction?
  • Input Processing research
    • Meaning first
    • Lexical preference
    • Redundancy and meaningfulness
    • Resources
    • Location
    • Word order and attenuating factors
  • Processing Instruction research
    • Comparison to other instructional interventions
    • Populations from different L1s and L2s
    • Secondary effects
    • Age
    • Discourse effects
    • Longitudinal effectiveness
  • Beyond L2 acquisition: Considerations for L3 acquisition
    • The role of prior linguistic knowledge
    • The role of individual differences
    • The role of a multilingual lexical-conceptual system
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 15 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.5.12ben
References (75)
References
Angelovska, T., & Benati, A. (2013). Processing instruction and the age factor: Can adults and school-age speakers of German process English simple past tense correctly? In J. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Individual differences and processing instruction, 131–152. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. (2009). Cognitive representation of color in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 83–95. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2011). Cognitive restructuring in bilingualism. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 29–65). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Kasai, C. (2008). Language and thought in bilinguals: The case of grammatical number and nonverbal classification preferences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(1), 105–121. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 95–127. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2004a). The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004b). The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness, 13(2), 67–80. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2005). The effects of PI, TI, and MOI in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Age and the effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of English passive constructions among school children and adult native speakers of Turkish. In J. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Individual differences and processing instruction, 83–104. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & Houghton, S. (2008). From processing instruction on the acquisition of English past tense to secondary transfer-of-training effects on English third person singular present tense. In A. Benati & J. Lee, Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects (pp. 88–120). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & Laval, C. (2008). From processing instruction on the acquisition of French imparfait to secondary transfer-of-training effects on French subjunctive and to cumulative transfer-of-training effects with French causative constructions. In A. Benati & J. Lee, Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects (pp. 121–157). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2010). Processing instruction and discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & Hikima, N. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse-level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. Benati & J. Lee, Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & McNulty, E. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando . In A. Benati & J. Lee, Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 97–147). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (Eds.) (2015). Processing Instruction: New insights after twenty years of theory, research, and application. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53(2).Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 179–93. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar . Hispania, 85, 308–323.Google Scholar
(2004). Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 119–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cook, V., Bassetti, B., Kasai, C., Sasaki, M., & Takahashi, J. (2006). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137–152. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Culman, H., Henry, N., & VanPatten, B. (2009). The role of explicit information in instructed SLA: An on-line study with processing instruction and German accusative case inflections. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 42(1), 19–31. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59–82. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Farley, A. (2001a). The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 57–94.Google Scholar
(2001b). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84(2), 289–299. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2004a). The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004b). Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 277–305. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hashemnezhad, H., & Zangalani, S. (2012). The effects of Processing Instruction and traditional instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ writing ability. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 125–135. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Henry, N., Culman, H., & VanPatten, B. (2009). More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA: A partial replication and a response to Fernández 2008. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 559–575. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Jarvis. S., & Pavlenko, A. (Eds.) (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keating, G., & Farley, A. (2008). Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 19, 639–650.Google Scholar
Kroll, J., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2004). On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 311–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007a). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2007b). Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems and possible solutions. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2009). Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2013). Individual differences and Processing Instruction. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Benati, A., Aguilar-Sánchez, J., & McNulty, E. (2007). Comparing three modes of delivering processing instruction on preterite/imperfect distinction and negative informal commands in Spanish. In J. Lee & A. Benati, Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice (pp. 73–98). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & McNulty, E. (2013). The effects of language background on the results of Processing Instruction on the Spanish subjunctive/indicative contrast after the adverb cuando . In J. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Individual differences and Processing Instruction (pp. 49–82). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Leeser, M., & DeMil, A. (2013). Investigating the secondary effects of processing instruction in Spanish: From instruction on accusative clitics to transfer-of-training effects on dative clitics. Hispania, 96, 748–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenet, A., Sanz, C, Lado, B., Howard, J., & Howard, D. (2011). Aging, pedagogical conditions, and differential success in SLA: An empirical study. In C. Sanz & R. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 73–84). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Linck J. A., Kroll, J., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56(3), 507–566. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mavrontoni, M., & Benati, A. (2013). The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on two different school-age learners: The case of English present simple tense, third person singular. In J. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Individual differences and processing instruction (pp. 185–210). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 31–65. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125–160). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In A. Pérez-Leroux & R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 2: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 41–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schwieter, J. W. (2013). Study abroad: Implications for L2 and lexical development. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Studies and global perspectives of second language teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Schwieter, J. W., & Ferreira, A. (2013). Language selection, control, and conceptual-lexical development in bilinguals and multilinguals. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (Language Learning & Language Teaching 38) (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwieter, J. W., & Sunderman, G. (2008). Language switching in bilingual speech production: In search of the language-specific selection mechanism. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 214–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Concept selection and developmental effects in bilingual speech production. Language Learning, 59(4), 897–927. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Stafford, C, Sanz, C., & Bowden, H. (2010). An experimental study of early L3 development: Age, bilingualism and classroom exposure. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(2), 162–183. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Uludag, O., & VanPatten, B. (2012). The comparative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive by speakers of Turkish. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50(3), 189–212. DOI logo.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015a). Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53(2), 91–109. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2015b). Processing perspectives on instructed second language acquisition. In J. W. Schwieter, The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 200–215). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015c). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition, (pp.113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. DOI logo.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Oikennon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495–510. DOI logo.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C. (2004). The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, (pp. 273–289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Inclezan, D., Salazar, H., & Farley, A. (2009). Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on object pronouns and word order in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 557–575. DOI logo.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Farmer, J., & Clardy, C. (2009). Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: A response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92(1), 116–126.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Borst, S. (2012a). The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in Processing Instruction: Nominative-accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 92–109. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2012b). The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in the processing of clitic object pronouns and word order in L2 Spanish. Hispania, 95(2), 270–284. Retrieved from <[URL]>
VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J., Borst, S., & Qualin, A. (2013). Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the First-Noun Principle: A cross-linguistic study in processing instruction. Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 504–525. DOI logo.Google Scholar
White, J., & DeMil, A. (2013a). Primary and secondary effects of PI. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(3), 59–88.Google Scholar
White, J. & DeMil, A. (2013b). Transfer-of-training effects in processing instruction: The role of form-related explicit information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 519–544. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2010). Exploring the effects of discourse-level structured input activities with French causative. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee, Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 198–216). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Marciszewska, Agnieszka A
2021. L3 morphosyntactic processing among Polish–English bilinguals: Considering learners’ level of bilingualism and language dominance. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja
2019. InstructedL3Acquisition ofEnglish. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja
2020. From L3 Acquisition to Teaching English. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Libben, Gary & John W. Schwieter
2019. Lexical Organization and Reorganization in the Multilingual Mind. In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism, ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo
Dabiri, Asma
2018. Comparing Two Modes of Instruction in English Passive Structures (Processing and Meaning-Based Output Instruction). JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) 3:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja & Angela Hahn
2017. L3 syntactic transfer – an integrative approach. In L3 Syntactic Transfer [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 5], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 8. Implications, limitations and further research. In Input Processing and Processing Instruction [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 11], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Chapter 5. Structured input vs. meaning output-based instruction on the acquisition of Italian passive constructions. In Input Processing and Processing Instruction [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 11], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.