Ager, S.
(1998) Omniglot: A guide to writing systems. In Encyclopedia Omniglot. Retrieved from http://​www​.omniglot​.com
Chang, L. Y.
(2015) Visual orthographic variation and learning to read across writing system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Chang, L. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Perfetti, C. A.
2018). GraphCom: A multi-dimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 427–449. doiCrossref.
Chang, L. Y., Plaut, D. C., & Perfetti, C. A.
(2016) Visual complexity in orthographic learning: Modeling learning across writing system variations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 64–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chein, J., & Morrison, A.
(2010) Expanding the mind’s workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 193–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. P., Allport, D. A., & Marshall. J. C.
(1996) What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the Stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 1024–1043. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. C., Chang, L. Y., Chiou, Y. S., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E.
(2011) Construction of Chinese orthographic database for Chinese character instruction. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43, 269–290.Google Scholar
Committee of National Languages and Scripts
(1986) Summary of Simplified Chinese Characters. http://​zh​.wikisource​.org​/zh​/ % E7 % AE % 80 % E5 % AD % 97 % E6 % 80 % BB % E8 % A1A8 (15 January, 2011).
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W.
(1996) The worldʹs writing systems. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, J.
(1989) Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A., Kui, Z. X., Spandoudis, G., Christou, C., Kyriakides, L., & Platsidou, M.
(2005) The architecture, dynamics, and development of mental processing: Greek, Chinese, or universal? Intelligence, 33, 109–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., Daal, V. H. P., Polyzoe, N., Tsipa, M., & Petalas, M.
(2004) The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fahle, M., & Poggio, T.
(2004) Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fiset, D., Blais, C., Ethier-Majcher, C., Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Gosselin, F.
(2008) Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological science, 19(11), 1161–1168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R.
(2012) Towards a universal model of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J.
(1963) A Study of Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirshorn, E., & Fiez, J.
(2014) Using artificial orthographies for studying cross-linguistic difference in the cognitive and neural profiles of reading. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 31, 69–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Frost, R.
(1992) Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: North Holland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., & Bus, A. G.
(2003) How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children’s products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891–905. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Chen. X., & Wang, Y.
(2016) The impact of visual-spatial attention on reading and spelling in Chinese children. Reading & Writing, 29(7), 1435–1447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Chow, B.
W-Y., Zhong, Y., Burgess, S. & Hayward, W. (2005) Chinese character acquisition and visual skills in two Chinese scripts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 99–128, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Zhou, Y., Cho, J.-R., Aram, D., Levin, I., & Tolchinsky, L.
(2011) Visual spatial skill: A consequence of learning to read? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 256–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education in Japan
(2015) Official list of kyōiku kanji by grade. Retrieved from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology – Japan website: http://​www​.mext​.go​.jp​/a​_menu​/shotou​/new​-cs​/youryou​/syo​/koku​/001​.htm
Morrison, A., & Chein, J.
(2011) Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 46–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S.
(2007) Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 7–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S.
(2011) The akshara languages: What do they tell us about children’s literacy learning? In R. Mishra & N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Language-cognition: State of the art (pp. 291–310). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Nag, S.
(2014) Alphabetism and the science of reading: From the perspective of the akshara languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 866, 1–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S., Caravolas, M., & Snowling, M. J.
(2011) Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 615–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S., Treiman, R., & Snowling, M. J.
(2010) Learning to spell in an alphasyllabary: The case of Kannada. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 41–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B. & Moore-Page, D. C.
(2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
C, A., & Harris, L. N.
(2013) Reading universals are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9, 296–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
(2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., Nelson, J., Bolger, D. J., & Tan, L.-H.
(2007) Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain’s reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H.
(2005) The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 12, 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I.
(1992) Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reas, C., & Fry, B.
(2010) Getting started with processing. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media.Google Scholar
Robins, S., & Treiman, R.
(2009) Learning about writing begins informally. In D. Abram & O. Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Scheerer, E.
(1986) Orthographic and lexical access. In G. August (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 262–286). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W.
(1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., & Daniels, P. T.
(2016) Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Folwer (2014). Writing System Research, 8(1), 17–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S.
(2011) Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle., B. Miller., J. Ren., & O. Tzeng (Eds.), Across languages: Orthography and the Gene-Brain-Behavior Link (pp. 146–168). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M.
(2003) Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y.
(2003) Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y-F., & Samuels, S. J.
(2010) Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1085–1108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamaoka, K., & Kiyama, S.
(2013) The effect of visual complexity for Japanese Kanji processing with high and low frequencies, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(2), 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Hompluem, L., Gordon, J., Decker, K., & Markson, L.
(2016) Young children’s knowledge of the symbolic nature of writing. Child Development, 87(2), 583–592. Crossref.Google Scholar
Tseng, C. C., Chen, H. C., Chang, L. Y., Zhuo, S. L., Hu, J. F., Lin, Z. H., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E.
(2016) Position-based regularities of radicals and their implications in Chinese character learning and instruction. (Manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A.
in press). Learning to reading across languages and writing systems. Cambridge: CUP.
Wang, Y., McBride-Chang, C., & Chan, S.
(2014) Correlates of Chinese kindergarteners’ word reading and writing: The unique role of copying skills? Reading & Writing, 27(7), 1281–1302. Crossref.Google Scholar
Watson, A.
(2012) Perimetric complexity of binary digital images. The Mathematica Journal, 14, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H.
(1990) Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2), 281–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winskel, H.
(2010) Spelling development in Thai children. Journal of Cognitive Science, 11, 7–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, N., Zhou, X., & Shu, H.
(1999) Sublexical processing in reading Chinese: A development study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 503–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wydell, T. N
(2012) Cross-cultural/linguistic differences in the prevalence of developmental dyslexia and the hypothesis of granularity and transparency. In T. N. Wydel & L. Fern-Pollak (Eds.), Dyslexia: A comprehensive and international approach (pp. 1–14). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yin, L., & McBride, C.
(2015) Chinese kindergarteners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. & McBride-Chang, C.
(2011) Diversity in Chinese literacy acquisition. Writing System Research, 3(1), 87–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U.
(2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Hirshorn, Elizabeth A. & Lindsay N. Harris
2022. Culture is not destiny, for reading: highlighting variable routes to literacy within writing systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Crossref logo
McBride, Catherine, Ying Wang & Leo Man-Lit Cheang
2018. Dyslexia in Chinese. Current Developmental Disorders Reports 5:4  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Pae, Hye K.
2020.  In Script Effects as the Hidden Drive of the Mind, Cognition, and Culture [Literacy Studies, 21],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Pae, Hye K.
2020.  In Script Effects as the Hidden Drive of the Mind, Cognition, and Culture [Literacy Studies, 21],  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Pan, Jinger, Xin Cui, Catherine McBride & Hua Shu
2020. An Investigation of the Bidirectional Relations of Word Reading to Timed Visual Tasks Involving Different Levels of Phonological Processing in Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading 24:4  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Sun, Jing, Hye K. Pae & Haiyang Ai
2021. The recognition of coordinative compound words by learners of Chinese as a foreign language: A mixed methods study. Foreign Language Annals 54:4  pp. 923 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.