Article published in:Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter: Band 20
Herausgegeben von Manuel Baumbach und Olaf Pluta
[Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 20] 2017
► pp. 49–62
Die Harmonisierung platonischer und aristotelischer Ontologie im neuplatonischen Kategorienkommentar
Commentaries on Plato’s and Aristotle’s works were central to the Neoplatonic school’s curriculum. In a fixed order, established since Jamblichus, the Aristotelian writings were first read, then the Platonic ones. At the beginning, the logical writings of Aristotle and particularly his Categories were examined. But like any other work, the Categories were construed from the perspective of Neoplatonic anagogy. In addition, the commentator was obliged to work out the commonalities between the two philosophical teachings. That anagogical and harmonising approach culminates in the commentaries on the Categories with the integration of the Aristotelian concept of substance into the Platonic concept of ideas. While Dexippus is primarily engaged in the right modes of predication corresponding to the sensible and the intelligible realm respectively, Simplicius focuses on the description of a continuous connection of being.
- 1.Der Kommentar im neuplatonischen Schulcurriculum
- 2.Der Gegenstand der Kategorienschrift in neuplatonischer Sicht
- 3.Formen der Prädikation und Stufung des Seins
- 4.Der Zusammenhang des Seins
This article is currently available as a sample article.
Article language: German
Published online: 26 March 2018