Cover not available
Article published In:
Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter: Band 23
Herausgegeben von Manuel Baumbach und Olaf Pluta
[Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 23] 2020
► pp. 117–140

Transcending natural philosophy or disregarding metaphysics?

Albert the Great on humors, reason and intellect

| University of Tours
Albert’s anthropology places the human being at the top of a hierarchy of living things in virtue of a unique feature – namely the intellect – that offers the possibility of transcending the changing realm of nature and of assimilating its possessor to their divine creator. Even though Albert, throughout his works, often defends the independence of the human intellect from matter and consequently from the body and senses, his works on natural philosophy seem to offer a different perspective. In De animalibus, Albert considers the brain to be the divine member of the body responsible for the operations of sensation and, to a certain degree, of intellection. Thus, the entire humoral activity of the human body has a direct influence on the activity of the intellect, his divine nature notwithstanding. Accordingly, the main purpose of the present study is to point out how the classical humoral theory is integrated by Albert the Great in his physiological consideration for an explanation of the intellect placed between the murky boundaries of natural philosophy and metaphysics.
Keywords: humoral theory, intellect, Albert the Great, natural philosophy, metaphysics
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The division of sciences and natural philosophy
  • 2.Humors and intellect in De animalibus
  • 3.Transcending natural philosophy in the theory of intellect
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00058.ile
References (28)
Bibliography
Primary literature
Alb. Anal. post. = Albertus Magnus, Analytica posteriora, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1890, Opera omnia, II1, 1–232.Google Scholar
Alb. De anima = Albertus Magnus, De anima, ed. C. Stroick, Aschendorff, Monasterii Westfalorum, 1968, Opera omnia (editio Coloniensis), VII/11.Google Scholar
Alb. De animal. = Albertus Magnus, De animalibus libri XXVI, ed. H. Stadler, Münster, 1916, 1920.Google Scholar
Alb. De caelo et mundo = Albertus Magnus, De caelo et mundo, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1890, Opera omnia, IV1, 1–343.Google Scholar
Alb. De homine = Albertus Magnus, De homine, ed. H. Anzulewicz, J. R. Söder, Aschendorff, Monasterii Westfalorum, 2008, Opera omnia (editio Coloniensis), XXVII/21.Google Scholar
Alb. De intell. = Albertus Magnus, De intellectu et intelligibili, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1890, Opera omnia, IX1, 477–525.Google Scholar
Alb. De IV coaeq. = Albertus Magnus, De IV coaequaevis, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1895, Opera omnia, XXXIV1.Google Scholar
Alb. Metaph. = Albertus Magnus, Metaphysica, ed. B. Geyer, Aschendorff, Monasterii Westfalorum, 1960, Opera omnia (editio Coloniensis), XVI/11.Google Scholar
Alb. On animals = Albertus Magnus, On Animals: A Medieval Summa Zoologica, translated by Kenneth F. Kitchell, and Irven M. Resnick, The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 2018.Google Scholar
Alb. Peri herm. = Albertus Magnus, Peri hermeneias, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1890, Opera omnia, I1, 373–457.Google Scholar
Alb. Phys. = Albertus Magnus, Physica, ed. P. Hossfeld, Aschendorff, Monasterii Westfalorum, 1987, 1993, Opera omnia (editio Coloniensis), IV/11 (lib. I-IV), IV/21 (lib. V-VIII).Google Scholar
Alb. Sent. = Albertus Magnus, Super IV libros Sententiarum, ed. A. Borgnet, Paris, 1894, Opera omnia, XXVII1.Google Scholar
Secondary literature
Anzulewicz, Henryk, “Entwicklung und Stellung der Intellekttheorie im System des Albertus Magnus” in AHDLMA 701, 2003, 165–218.Google Scholar
Ashley, Benedict M. OP, “Anthropology: Albert the Great on the Cogitative Power” in Resnick (2013), pp. 299–324.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara, Steven Rendall Emily S. Apter, Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de AsÁa, Miguel, “War and Peace: Medicine and Natural Philosophy in Albert” in Resnick (2013), 269–298.Google Scholar
FÜhrer, Markus, “Albert the Great”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <[URL]>.
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus, “The Early Albertus Magnus and his Arabic Sources on the Theory of the Soul” in Vivarium, Vol. 46, No. 3, Special Issue: Transformations of the Soul. Aristotelian Psychology 1250–1650 (2008), 232–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krause, K.; Anzulewicz, H., “Appropriating Traditions of Totality: Reality as a Whole in Albert the Great” in D. Calma, Z. Kaluza (eds.), Regards sur les traditions philosophiques (XIIe-XVIe siècles), Leuven University Press 2017, 99–126.Google Scholar
Miteva, Evelina, “Intellect, Natural Philosophy, Finality: Albertus Magnus’ Attempt at a Universal System of Sciences” in Philobiblon XXII1 (2017) /21, 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nauta, L., “The ‘Glosa’ as Instrument for the Development of Natural Philosophy. William of Conches’ Commentary on Boethius” in M. J. F. M. Hoenen, L. Nauta (eds.), Boethius in the Middle Ages: Latin and Vernacular Traditions of the Consolatio Philosophiae, Brill 1997, 3–40.Google Scholar
Resnick, I. M. (ed.), A Companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, Brill, Leiden, 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resnick, M.; Kitchell, K. F., Albert the Great. A Selectively Annotated Bibliography (1900–2000), Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Tempe 2004.Google Scholar
Tkacz, Michael, “Albert the Great on Logic, Knowledge, and Science” in Resnick (2013), 507–540.Google Scholar
, The Use of Aristotelian Methodology of Division and Demonstration in the ‘De animalibus’ of Albert the Great, Catholic University of America, Ph.D. Thesis, 1993.Google Scholar
Wallace, w. a. op, “Albertus Magnus on Suppositional Necessity in the Natural Sciences” in Albertus Magnus and the Sciences, 103–128.
Washell, R. F., “Logic, Language, and Albert the Great” in Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 34, No. 3 (Jul.–Sep., 1973), 445–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, J. A. (ed.), Albertus Magnus and the Sciences. Commemorative Essays, 1980, Pontifical Inst. of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto, 1980.Google Scholar