Cover not available
Part of
Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey
Edited by Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar, Saliha Paker and John Milton
[Benjamins Translation Library 118] 2015
► pp. 27–52

On the poetic practices of a “singularly uninventive people” and the anxiety of imitation

A critical re-appraisal in terms of translation, creative mediation and “originality”

This paper addresses the fundamental question of imitativeness vs. originality in Ottoman poetics. By positing translation (terceme) as the central practice of literary transfer, fresh arguments are offered to shift focus away from sterile discussions of imitation onto related strategies (telif, creative mediation, and nakl, appropriative transmission) that challenged the central “repetitive” practice of translation in “the order of resemblance” (Foucault 1971), thereby stimulating the dynamics of the Perso-Ottoman “interculture” (Paker 2002). Especially important are two arguments that connect Ottoman poetics with translation and transmission: that telif did not signify “original” in opposition to terceme, that the Qur’an was accepted as the ultimate Original in view of its “miraculous” creation (i’jaz); and that any theory of Ottoman literary translation would have to be posited at the very root of Ottoman poetics in conjunction with the concept of the Qur’anic Original.

Keywords: creative mediation (telif), epistemic order of “resemblance”, Foucault, i’jaz, original, Ottoman poetics, Ottoman translation theory, the Qur’an, translation (terceme) as repetition
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.118.01pak
References
Andrews, Walter G
2002 “Starting Over Again: Some Suggestions for Rethinking Ottoman Divan Poetry in the Context of Translation and Transmission.” In Translations: (Re)shaping of Literature and Culture, edited by Saliha Paker, 15–40. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold
2011 The Anatomy of Influence. Literature as a Way of Life. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boullata, Issa J
2005 “I’jāz.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, 4370–4371. 2nd ed. Vol. 7. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.Google Scholar
Demircioğlu, Cemal
2005 From Discourse to Practice: Rethinking “Translation” (Terceme) and Related Practices of Text Production in the Late Ottoman Literary Tradition. Ph.D. Thesis. Boğaziçi University. [URL]
2009 “Translating Europe: The Case of Ahmed Midhat as an Ottoman Agent of Translation.” In Agents of Translation, eds. John Milton and Paul Bandia, 131–159. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T.S
1975 “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” In Selected Prose of T.S. Eliot, edited by (with an introduction) Frank Kermode, 37–44. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
2002 “The Making of Culture Repertoire and the Role of Transfer.” In Translation(s): (Re)shaping of Literature and Culture, edited by Saliha Paker, 166–174. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Fatani, Afnan H
2006 “Translation and the Qur’an.” In The Qur’an: An Encyclopedia, ed. O. Leaman. 657–670. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1977 The Order of Things. An Archaeology of Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Fuzûlî
1950 Fuzûlî’nin Farsça Divanı: Tercümesi. (A translation into Turkish of his poetry collection in Persian, by Ali Nihat Tarlan.) Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
Gibb, E.J.W
1900–1909 A History of Ottoman Poetry. Edited by E.G. Browne. 6 Volumes. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. 27: 465.Google Scholar
1901/2002 Ottoman Literature. The Poets and Poetry of Turkey. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
1943 Osmanlı Şiiri Tarihi, Vol I. Book 1. [Translated into Turkish by Vahit Turhan, Mina Urgan, Kasım Küfralı, Mükerrem Yörükoğlu, Ercüment Atabay, under the editorial supervision of Halide Edib Adıvar with an introduction]. Istanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Gould, Rebecca
2013 “Inimitability versus Translatability. The Structure of Literary Meaning in Arabo-Persian Poetics.” The Translator 19, No. 1: 81–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gölpınarlı, Abdülbâki
1971 Şeyh Galib Divanı’ndan Seçmeler. Istanbul: Millî Eğitim Basımevi.Google Scholar
1990 Preface to his translation Mantık Al-Tayr by Attar. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Victoria Rowe
2005 “Introduction.” Şeyh Galip. Beauty and Love. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
1994 The Unreadable Shores of Love. Turkish Modernity and Mystic Romance. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Kahramanoğlu, Kemal
2006 Divan Şiiri. Değişen Dünyada Kaybolmuş Paradigma. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Köprülü, Mehmed Fuad
1913/1989 Edebiyat Araştırmaları, Vol. 1. Istanbul: Ötüken.Google Scholar
1947/1989. Edebiyat Araştırmaları, Vol. 2. Istanbul: Ötüken. Google Scholar
Kuru, Selim S
2012 “The Literature of Rum: The making of a literary tradition (1450–1600).” In The Cambridge History of Turkey, Vol. 2 The Ottoman Empire as a World Power 1453–1603, edited by Suraiya N. Faroqhi and Kate Fleet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 548–592.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Emile
1837 Traité théorique et pratique de littérature. [URL].
Mengi, Mine
2000 “Yüzyıllık Bir Batı Kaynağı: Gibb’in Osmanlı Şiir Tarihi.” In Divan Şiiri Yazıları, 141–172. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Scott L
2000 Science in Translation. Movements of Knowledge through Cultures and Time. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Pala, İskender
2007 “Mazmun.” In Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi, edited by T.S. Halman et al., Vol. 1, 403–409. Istanbul: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Paker, Saliha
2014 “Telif, Tercüme ve Özgünlük Meselesi.” In Metnin Hâlleri: Osmanlı’da Telif, Tercüme ve Şerh. Eski Türk Edebiyatı Çalışmaları IX, edited by Hatice Aynur, Müjgan Çakır, Hanife Koncu, Selim S. Kuru, and Ali Emre Özyıldırım, 36–71. Istanbul: Klasik.Google Scholar
2011 “Translation, the Pursuit of Inventiveness and Ottoman Poetics: A Systemic Approach.” In Between Cultures and Texts: Itineraries in Translation History. Entre les cultures et les textes: itinéraire en histoire de la traduction, edited by Antoine Chalvin, Anne Lange, and Daniele Monticelli. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang GmbH. 243–254; also in Culture Contacts and the Making of Cultures, Papers in Homage to Itamar Even-Zohar, edited by Rakefet Sela-Sheffy and Gideon Toury, 457–472. Unit of Culture Research, Tel-Aviv University. [URL].Google Scholar
2007 “Influence-Imitation-Translation or Translation-Imitation-Influence? A Problematic Interrelationship in Mehmed Fuad Köprülü’s Literary-Historical Discourse.” In Language, Society, History: The Balkans, edited by A.-F. Christidis, 265–277. Thessaloniki. Centre for Greek Language.Google Scholar
2006 “Ottoman Conceptions of Translation and Its Practice. The 1897 ‘Classics Debate’ as a Focus of Examining Change.” In Translating Others, Vol.2, edited by Theo Hermans, 325–348. Manchester UK & Kinderhook, USA: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2002a “Translation as Terceme and Nazire. Culture-bound Concepts and Their Implications for a Conceptual Framework for Research on Ottoman Translation History.” In Crosscultural Transgressions. Research Models in Translation Studies II. Historical and Ideological Issues, edited by Theo Hermans, 120–143. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2002b Translation(s): (Re)shaping of Literature and Culture. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony, Miriam Schlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni
2008 Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies. Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahman, Yusuf
1996 “The Miraculous Nature of Muslim Scripture: A Study of ‘Abd Al-Jabbar’s ‘I’jaz al-Qur’an’.” In Islamic Studies, 35 (4): 409–424. [URL]. Accessed: 17/02/2014 07:45Google Scholar
Salih Çelebi
2007 Salih Çelebi ve Mecnûn u Leylâ Mesnevisi (Kıssa-i Pür Gussa). Critical Edition and Textual Analysis. Edited by Zehra Toska. The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Saraç, M.A. Yekta
2000 “Klasik Türk Edebiyatında Manada Orijinallik Meselesi / The Problem of Originality in Classical Turkish Literature.” Journal of Turkish Studies, In Memoriam Agâh Sırrı Levend I: 229–243.Google Scholar
Şeyh Galip
2005 Beauty and Love. Translated by Victoria Holbrook (with an introduction). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Şeyh Galib
2007 Hüsn ü Aşk (annotated interlingual translation into modern Turkish, with parallel text in Ottoman). Edited by Muhammet Nur Doğan. Istanbul: Yelkenli Kitabevi.Google Scholar
Tahir-ül Mevlevî
(also known as Tahir Olgun) 1973 Edebiyat Lügatı. Edited by Kemal Edib Kürkçüoğlu. Istanbul: Enderun Kitabevi.Google Scholar
Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi
1982 19uncu Asır Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi. Istanbul: Çağlayan Kitabevi.Google Scholar
Toska, Zehra
2007 Ed. Salih Çelebi ve Mecnûn u Leylâ Mesnevisi (Kıssa-i Pür Gussa). The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University.
Toury, Gideon
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2003 “Ideology and the Position of the Translator. In What Sense is a Translator ‘In Between’?” In Apropos of Ideology. Translation Studies on Ideology – Ideologies in Translation Studies, edited by Maria Calzada Perez. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Üstünsöz, İrem
2011 The Legal Status and the Self-Images of Translators in Turkey. Saarbrücken: LAP, Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

ARSLAN, Devrim Ulaş, Müge IŞIKLAR KOÇAK & Ahu Selin ERKUL YAĞCI
2023. The serial novel as an object of research in translation history: Methodological implications for historiography of translation. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi DOI logo
Berk Albachten, Özlem & Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar
2019. Introduction: Mutability in Retranslation. In Studies from a Retranslation Culture [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Büyükkarcı Yılmaz, Fatma
2019. On Gulistan’s Turkish (Re)translations: A Chronological Survey Through Paratextual Data. In Studies from a Retranslation Culture [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Ergil, Başak
2022. Chapter 5. “Humourizing” the theatre of the absurd through reworking and (self-)translation. In Humour in Self-Translation [Topics in Humor Research, 11], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Gambier, Yves
2018. Chapter 1.1. Concepts of translation. In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge [Benjamins Translation Library, 142], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Katiboğlu, Monica
2020. Specters and Circulation of Meaning. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 40:2 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.