Cover not available
Part of
Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey
Edited by Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar, Saliha Paker and John Milton
[Benjamins Translation Library 118] 2015
► pp. 145–162

Translation, imported western legal frameworks and insights from the Turkish world of patents

The field of patent protection was imported via translation from West-European countries into Turkey. Not only the legal framework but also patent specifications as a text type have been adopted from Western legal traditions. Previous research has revealed that unlike Western textual models of patent specifications with their specific macro and micro structures varying according to the legal tradition of each country in the exporting system, we are not in a position to speak of a specific text type for the Turkish context. This paper offers a brief introduction to the role of translation in the drafting of laws and regulations in the Turkish Republic and discusses the reception of the patent system including the problems encountered in the transfer process into Turkey. It will also offer a number of insights to be drawn from the specific circumstances in Turkey which will also have implications for a discussion on the phenomenon of translation in the age of globalization.
Keywords: intellectual property rights, patent convention, patent rights, patent translation, translation profession
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.118.07bay
References (22)
Abdallah, Kristiina, and Kaisa Koskinen. 2007. “Managing Trust: Translating and the Network Economy.” Meta: Translation and Network Studies, 52:4: 673–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aydın, M. Âkif. 2005. Türk Hukuk Tarihi. Istanbul: Hars Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
Bozdoğan, Sibel, and Reşat Kasaba, eds. 1997. Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bozkurt, Gülnihal. 1996. Batı Hukukunun Türkiye’de Benimsenmesi Osmanlı Devleti’nden Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’ne Resepsiyon Süreci (1839–1939). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.Google Scholar
Brockmeier, Jens. 1997 Literales Bewuβtsein: Schriftlichkeit und das Verhältnis von Sprache und Kultur. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Daldeniz, Elif. 2004. Kültürlerarası Aktarımda Dil ve Çeviri Olgusuna Bakış: Bir Metin Alt Türü Olarak Patent Metinlerinin Türkçede Oluşum Serüveni. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Istanbul University.
. 2006. “The Double Existence of Translations: Insights to be gained from Patent Translations.” Paper delivered at the “translation and translation – des faux amis tracing translation(s) across disciplines, International Translation Studies Conference 2,” 5–8 April 2007, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1990. Polysystem Studies. [= Poetics Today 11: 1]. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Outline for Polysystem Culture Research”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, XXIV (1):15–34.Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Making of Culture Repertoire and the Role of Transfer.” In Translations: (Re)shaping of Literature and Culture, edited by Saliha Paker, 166–174. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne. 1995. Textsorten in Naturwissenschaften und Technik. Pragmatische Typologie – Kontrastierung – Translation, Forum für Fachsprachen-Forschung 27, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Patentschriften.” In Handbuch Translation, edited by Mary Snell-Hornby, Hans G. Hönig, Paul Kuβmaul, and Peter A. Schmitt, 222 – 225. Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
Greif, Siegfried. 2000. “Patentschriften als wissenschaftliche Literatur.” InWissenschaft und Digitale Bibliothek: Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 1998, edited by Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski, Hubert Laitko, Heinrich Parthey, Walther Umstätter, 1–26. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Ernst E. 1981. Rezeption als sozialer Prozeß Erläutert am Beispiel der Türkei. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.Google Scholar
Koçak, Mustafa. 2010. “Sharia and National Law in Turkey.” In Sharia Incorporated. A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present, edited by Jan Michiel Otto, 231–272. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Ortan, Ali Necip. 1992. “Avrupa Patent Sistemi Açısından Türk Patent Hukukunun Durumu.” In Patent Sistemleri ve Patent Ofis Organizasyonları Uluslararası Sempozyumu, 137–150. Ankara: Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları.Google Scholar
Schamlu, Mariam. 1985. Patentschriften-Patentwesen, Eine argumentationstheoretische Analyse Studien Deutsch Band 1, Munich: Iudicium Verlag.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2007. Making Globalization Work. London, New York, and Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Velidedeoğlu, Hıfzı Devlet. 1999. İlk Meclis. Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Gazetesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 2008. “Translation, Simulacra, Resistance.” Translation Studies 1 (1): 18–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael H., and Wolfgang Thieler. 2001. Wegweier für den Erfinder, Von der Aufgabe über die Idee zum Patent. Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Yalçıner, Uğur. 1992. “Türkiye’de Patent Sistemi.” In Patent Sistemleri ve Patent Ofisi Organizasyonları Uluslararası Sempozyumu Ankara 12 – 12.10.1992, 99–113. Ankara: Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü Türkiye İş Bankası Vakfı – Hukuk Fakültesi.Google Scholar