Cover not available
Part of
A World Atlas of Translation
Edited by Yves Gambier and Ubaldo Stecconi
[Benjamins Translation Library 145] 2019
► pp. 215–242

Chapter 10
Altaic tradition

Turkey

This report offers a brief historical and cultural lexicon of the Turkish terms/concepts for translation by means of available primary and archival materials and proposes a small-scale genealogy of Altaic tradition in two main parts. In the first part, a special focus is on Uighur Turkish in Central Asia (Old Turkic period, 9th century), followed by Anatolian Turkish developed in Asia Minor since the 11th century (West Turkic). Due to insufficient historical research and data on translation within the paradigm of Translation Studies, the report will not scan translational terms/concepts in Qarakhanid, Qharezm and Chagatai Turkish, which are members of East Turkic tradition. In the second part, the report reviews translation as concept and practice, focusing especially on the Turkish literary discourse of the late 19th century since this era is a period of the Turks’ encounter with Europe, hence, a period of shifting civilization from the East to the West, which led to a change in translation conception (see Paker 2006; Demircioğlu 2005).
Keywords: Altaic tradition of translation, Turkish terms/concepts for translation, translation as concept and practice in Ottoman society
Article outline
  • 1.Identifying translation in East Turkic
  • 2.Identifying translation in West Turkic
  • 3.Identifying translation in Ottoman lexicons
    • 3.1Terceme in dictionaries translated from Arabic
    • 3.2Terceme in Ottoman Turkish dictionaries
  • 4.Translation in Ottoman literary discourse in the late nineteenth century
    • 4.1Metaphors about translation
    • 4.2Translation as “imitation” and “emulation”
    • 4.3Functions attributed to translation
    • 4.4Translation and progress
    • 4.5Translation and Ottoman moral values
  • 5.Translation strategies in discourse
    • 5.1Bipartite strategy: As the “same” versus “free”
    • 5.2Tripartite strategy: “As the same”, “sense-for-sense” and “expanded”
    • 5.3Quadripartite strategy: “Sense-for-sense”, “imitation” and fidelity to “figures of speech” and “thoughts”
    • 5.4A mode of converting between genres: “Tying” and “loosing”
    • 5.5Translation as “summary”, “commentary” and “explanation”
  • 6.Problem of translatability, terminological correspondence and translator’s quality
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.145.10dem
References (34)
References
Argunşah, Mustafa (ed.) 1999. Muhammed b. Mahmûd-ı Şirvânî Tuhfe-i Murâdi: İnceleme, Metin, Dizin. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
Caferoğlu, Ahmet. 1993. Eski Uygur Türkçesi Sözlüğü. 3rd ed. Istanbul: Enderun Kitabevi.Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard. 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demircioğlu, Cemal. 2003. “19. Yüzyıl Sonu Türk Edebiyatında ‘Tercüme Kavramı”, Journal of Turkish Studies (Türklük Bilgisi Araştırmaları), Kaf Dağının Ötesine Varmak, Günay Kut Armağanı, Sayı 27, Cilt II, Harvard University Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, 13–31.Google Scholar
. 2005. From Discourse to Practice: Rethinking “Translation” (Terceme) and Related Practices of Text Production in the Late Ottoman Literary Tradition. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Translating Europe: The Case of Ahmed Midhat as an Ottoman Agent of Translation”. In Agents of Translation, John Milton and Paul Bandia (eds.), 131–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “El-Cahız’dan Manastırlı Mehmet Rıfat’a: Arap Çeviri Kuramcıları ile Osmanlı Mütercimleri Arasındaki Bağlantılar” Turkish Studies – International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 8 (13), Fall 2013: 739–759.Google Scholar
Dihhüda, Ali Ekber. 1919. Lügatname. Tehran.Google Scholar
Dilçin, Cem. 1991. Mes‘ûd Bin Ahmed Süheyl ü Nev-Bahâr: İnceleme, Metin, Sözlük. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Siegmund. 1962. Die Aramäischen Fremdwörter im Arabischen. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Furat, A. Subhi. 1988. “Vankulu” in İslam Ansiklopedisi 13: 202–203. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Gökyay, Orhan Şaik. 1976. “Kenzü’l-Küberâ ve Mahakkü’l-Ulemâ” in Çevren. 9: 37–51; and 10: 43–79; and 11, 173–175.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1995. “Revisiting the Classics: Toury’s Empiricism Version One” in The Translator, Volume 1, Number 2, 215–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüseyin, Hüsnü. 1880–1881. İlaveli Müntehabat-ı Lügat-ı Osmaniyye. [yy].Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ramazan. 1998. Klâsikler Tartışması Başlangıç Dönemi. Ankara: Atatürk Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
Kemal, Paşazade Saîd. 1888–1889. Galatat-ı Terceme, 2nd Notebook. Istanbul: Şirket-i Mürettibiye Matbaası.Google Scholar
Kolcu, Ali İhsan. 1999. Türkçe’de Batı Şiiri. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.Google Scholar
Mehmed, Vani (trans.) 1755–1756. Vankulu Lügati. Istanbul: Dârü’t-Tıbaatü’l-Âmire.Google Scholar
Mütercim, Asım (trans.) 1817–1818. El-Okyanus el-basit fi tercemet’il-kamus el-muhit, vol 3. Istanbul: Darü’t-Tıbaatü’l-Âmire.Google Scholar
Okiç, M. Tayyib. 1966. “Hadiste Tercüman” in Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi xiv: 27–52.Google Scholar
Orhonlu, Cengiz. 1993. “Tercüman” in İslâm Ansiklopedisi 12 (I): 175–181. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
Ölmez, Mehmet. 1997. “Kurzer Überblick über die Buddhistische Übersetzungsliteratur in Alttürkisch (Eski Türkçe Budist Çeviri Edebiyatına Kısa Bir Bakış)”. In Çağdaş Türk Edebiyatına Eleştirel Bir Bakış, Nevin Önberk Armağanı. Mehmet Ölmez (ed.), 225–256. Ankara: Simurg.Google Scholar
Özkan, Mustafa. 1993. Gülistan Tercümesi: Giriş, İnceleme, Metin, Sözlük. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
Paker, Saliha. 1998. “Turkish Tradition” in Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, Mona Baker (ed.), 571–582. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Translation as Terceme and Nazire: Culture-bound Concepts and their Implications for a Conceptual Framework for Research on Ottoman Translation History”. In Crosscultural Transgressions, Research Models in Translation Studies II Historical and Ideological Issues, Theo Hermans (ed.), 120–143. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Ottoman Conceptions of Translation and its Practice. The 1897 ‘Classics Debate’ as a Focus for Examining Change”, in Translation Others, Theo Hermans (ed.), vol. 2, 325–348. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Reşad Faik [undated] Mükemmel Osmanlı Lügati. [Istanbul]: Tefeyyüz Kütüphanesi.
Şemseddin, Sami. 1899–1900. Kamus-ı Türkî. Dersaadet: İkdam Matbaası.Google Scholar
Tahir-Gürçağlar, Şehnaz. 2008. “The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey 1923–1960” Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Tahir-Gürçağlar, Şehnaz, Saliha Paker and John Milton (eds) 2015. “Introduction” in Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tekin, Şinasi. 1995/2008. “Eski Türklerde Tercüme Faaliyetleri” paper presented in the regular seminars arranged by Saliha Paker for the contribution to the first Ph.D. courses in 1995 on “History of Translation in Ottoman/Turkish Society”, at the department of Translation and Interpreting of Boğaziçi University. Published in 2008: “Eski Türklerde Tercüme Geleneği” Journal of Turkish Studies (Türklük Bilgisi Araştırmaları), Şinasi Tekin Hatıra Sayısı, Sayı 32, Cilt II, Harvard University Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, 99–111.
. 2000. “Timur Öncesinde Anadolu ile Orta Asya Türk Dünyası Arasındaki Kültür İlişkileri ve Güzîde Kitabı’nın ‘Tercüme’ Hikâyesi” in Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten, 151–194.Google Scholar
Varlık, Mustafa Çetin. 1979. “Şeyh-oğlu’nun Kenzü’l-Küberâ ve Mehakku’l-Ulemâ Adlı Tercüme Eseri” in I. Milletlerarası Türkoloji Kongresi (Istanbul, 15–20.X.1973) Teblğler, Istanbul, 543–552.Google Scholar
Yavuz, Kemal (ed.) 1991. Şeyhoğlu Kenzü’l-Küberâ ve Mehekkü’l-Ulemâ: İnceleme, Metin, İndeks. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar