Chapter 4
Affective labor in the simultaneous interpreting of prayer
An autoethnographic re-analysis
This chapter provides a re-analysis of the fieldnotes I gathered in an autoethnographic study of
simultaneous church interpreting (Hokkanen 2016). I re-analyzed
descriptions of interpreted prayers in the fieldnotes from the perspective of affective labor, understood as the
manipulation of one’s emotions to achieve organizational goals (Koskinen
2020; Hochschild [1983] 2012). In this paper I also discuss the
implications of changes in researcher positionality when re-analyzing past fieldnotes, highlighting the importance of
reflexivity. The different social positions I had during fieldwork and during the current re-analysis result in two
readings of the affective labor involved in the simultaneous interpreting of prayer. This demonstrates the nature of
ethnographic research accounts as constructed representations and the role of the researcher in knowledge
production.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 2.1Affective labor
- 2.2Affective labor in interpreting
- 3.Pentecostal experientiality and prayer
- 4.Autoethnography and the changing researcher positionality
- 5.Affective labor in simultaneously interpreted prayer
- 5.1Functions of prayer in a church interpreter’s work
- 5.2Interpreting prayer through blended roles
- 6.Conclusions
-
Note
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.