Cover not available
Part of
Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar
Edited by Hans C. Boas and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Constructional Approaches to Language 15] 2014
► pp. 181–226

Chapter 6. Bringing together fragments and constructions

Evidence from complementation in English and Spanish

| University of Almería, Spain
In this article, I argue that Thompson’s (2002) fragment analysis of (finite) complementation in English, while insightful, cannot be plausibly duplicated for all complementation strategies in English and Spanish. Specifically, this analysis cannot account for a number of semantico-pragmatic restrictions on the NP and the XPCOMP in secondary predication in English and Spanish. Moreover, the Thompsonian analysis alone cannot capture the grammatical relations holding between clitics and matrix verbs on the one hand, and matrix verbs and their XPCOMPs on the other hand, in dialogic Spanish data involving right or left dislocation. The Goldbergian constructional analysis of secondary predication in English and Spanish presented here under the rubric of a family of subjective-transitive constructions draws on the interaction of specific, locally-bound fragments as well as more abstract constructions, thus corroborating the need to reconcile usage and morpho-syntactic facts.
Published online: 28 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.15.06gon
References (94)
References
Aijmer, K. (1997). I think – an English modal particle. In T. Swan, & O. Jansen Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages – Historical and comparative perspective (pp. 1–47). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Goldberg, A.E. (2008). The island status of clausal complements: Evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 349–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersson, E. (1985). On verb complementation in written English [Lund Studies in English, 71]. Lund: Gleerup Liber.Google Scholar
Barnes, B.K. (1985). The pragmatics of left-dislocation in spoken standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckner, C., & Bybee, J. (2009). A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning, 59, 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., & Willems, D. (this volume). A constructional corpus-based approach of weak verbs in French.
Boas, H.C. (2008). Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 113–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (Ed.). (2010). Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borkin, A. (1973). To be or not to be. Proceedings of the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 44–56.
. (1984). Problems in form and function. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P. (2007). Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31, 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
British National Corpus. Retrieved from [URL].
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P.J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure [Typological Studies in Language, 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Scheibman, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. & Guasti, M.T. (Eds.). (1995). Syntax and semantics: Small clauses (Vol. 28). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1978). El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
CREA Corpus. Real Academia Española (RAE). Retrieved from [URL].
Croft, W. (2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language. Studies in honour of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H., & Verstraete, J-C. (2006). Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 365–392.Google Scholar
Demonte, V., & Masullo, P. (1999). La predicación: Los complementos predicativos. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2 – Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales y relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales) (pp. 2461–2523). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Dik, S.C. (1978). Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 164]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M.J. (1999). La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2 – Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales y relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales) (pp. 2357–2460). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Fernández Lorences, T. (2010). Gramática de la tematización en español. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Fox, B.A. (1994). Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language Sciences, 16, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Miguel, J.M. (1991). La duplicación de complemento directo e indirecto como concordancia. Verba, 18, 375–410.Google Scholar
García-Miguel, J.M., & Vázquez Rozas, V. (1994). Lingüística de corpus y lingüística descriptiva: El caso de la ‘duplicación de objetos’. Boletín de la Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 14, 47–62.Google Scholar
Geluykens, R. (1987). Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversation. In J. Nuyts, & G. De Schutter (Eds.), Getting one’s words into line: On word order and functional grammar (pp. 119–129). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1993). Topic introduction in English conversation. Transactions of the Philological Society,91–92, 181–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E., & Jackendoff, R.J. (2004). The resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80, 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F. (2006a). Passives without actives: Evidence from verbless complement constructions in Spanish. Constructions, SV1-5/2006.Google Scholar
. (2006b). The fortunes of the competition between the accusative and infinitive and the NP + PRED complement constructions after verba cogitandi in English: A construction grammar view. In J.G. Vázquez González, M. Martínez Vázquez, & P. Ron Vaz (Eds.), The historical linguistics-cognitive linguistics interface (pp. 75–145). Huelva: Grupo de Gramática Contrastiva.Google Scholar
. (2009). The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a usage-based, constructionist analysis. Language Sciences, 31(5), 663–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Contrasting constructions in English and Spanish: The influence of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors. In H.C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 43–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, P. (2012). Emergent and usage-based models of grammar. In H-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 507–532). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1996). The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In M. Haspelmath, & E König (Eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–55). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M.L., & Brucart, J.M. (1987). La sintaxis. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, R. (2002). Establishing topic in conversation: A contrastive study of left-dislocation in English and Spanish. Clac, 11/2002.Google Scholar
. (2003). La tematización en el español hablado. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.Google Scholar
. (1988). Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 117–134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. (2007). Linguistics and micro-rhetoric: A twenty-first century encounter. Journal of English Linguistics, 35, 236–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer, & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwata, S. (2008). Locative alternation. A lexical-constructional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1981). Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French [Pragmatics and Beyond II, 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 71]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2010). How not to disagree: The emergence of structure from usage. In K. Boye, & E. Engberg-Pedersen (Eds.), Language use and language structure (pp. 107–143). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
López García, A. (1996). La informatividad. Gramática del español II. La oración simple. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?In R.J. Jarvella, & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 101–124). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Martínez Álvarez, J. (1985). Sobre algunas estructuras atributivas. In Lecciones del I y II Curso de Lingüística Funcional (1983 y 1984). Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Martínez Caro, E. (1999). Gramática del discurso: Foco y énfasis en inglés y español. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, J.C. (1989). Impersonal constructions in Spanish. In M. Hannay, & E. Vester (Eds.), Working with functional grammar: Descriptive and computational applications (pp. 31–40). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1991). Curso universitario de lingüística general (Vol. 1). Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.L. (1993). Discourse markers and sentential syntax. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 23(1), 163–167.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J. (2003). Theoretical implications of grammatical theory-grammatical relation mismatches. In E.J. Francis, & L.A. Michaelis (Eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (pp. 149–178). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar
. (2010). What conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar: A critique of Thompson’s analysis of object complements. In K. Boye, & E. Engberg-Pedersen (Eds.), Language use and language structure (pp. 3–43). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nicita, L. (2002). Cognitive verbs in Spanish: A discourse profile of ‘‘acordarse’’, ‘‘creer’’, ‘‘saber’’ and related verbs. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Postal, P.M. (1974). On raising. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reyes, G. (1985). Orden de palabras y valor informativo en español. In Philologica Hispaniensia in honorem Manuel Alvar (Vol. II, pp. 567–588). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. (1975). Some pragmatic conditions on complementizer choice. Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 467–474.
Rivero, M.L. (1980). On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(2), 363–393.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Espiñeira, M.J. (1985). El complemento predicativo del complemento directo en español. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events. A study of the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sedano, M. (2006). Sobre la dislocación a la derecha en español. Lingua Americana, 18, 59–73.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1984). Topicalización y pragmática en español. Revista Española de Lingüística, 14(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
. (1989). Sociolingüística. Teoría y análisis. Madrid: Alhambra.Google Scholar
Suñer Gratacós, A. (1990). La predicación secundaria en español. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.A. (2002). ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26, 125–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.A., & Mulac, A. (1991). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. 2: Types of grammatical markers [Typological Studies in Language, 19: 2] (pp. 313–327). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Dasher, R.B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urmson, J.O. (1952). Parenthetical verbs. Mind, 61, 480–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2010). Usage, structure, scientific explanation, and the role of abstraction, by linguists and by language users. In K. Boye, & E. Engberg-Pedersen (Eds.), Language use and language structure (pp. 45–71). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vigara Tauste, A.M. (1992). Morfosintaxis del español coloquial. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Villalba, X. (2011). A quantitative comparative study of right-dislocation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1946–1961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, G., & Birner, B.J. (1996). On the discourse function of rightward movement in English. In A.E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 463–479). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Weber, E.G., & Bentivoglio, P. (1991). Verbs of cognition in spoken Spanish: A discourse profile. In S. Fleishman, & L.R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse-pragmatics and the verb. The evidence from Romance (pp. 194–213). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1997). Lexical and syntactic complex predicates. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 13–28). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1955). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ziv, Y. (1994). Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 629–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L. (1999). Las funciones informativas: Tema y foco. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 3 – Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología, pp. 4215–4245). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar