Article published in:
Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical
Edited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 1–9

Canonical and non-canonical subjects in constructions

Perspectives from cognition and discourse

Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.01hel
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R.M.W. Dixon, & Masayuki Onishi
(Eds.) (2001) Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Achard, Michel
(1998) Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin and New-York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
(2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
(2005) A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 475–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, & Östman, Jan-Ola
(2004) Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
(2001) Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
(2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward
(1976) Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne
(2002) Point of view and grammar. Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
(2008) Impersonalization from a subject-centered vs. agent-centered perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106, 115–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar