Part of
Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical
Edited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 19
References (18)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R.M.W. Dixon, & Masayuki Onishi (Eds.). (2001). Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Achard, Michel (1998). Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin and New-York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam (2005). A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 475–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, & Östman, Jan-Ola (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa (2001). Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward (1976). Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna (2008). Impersonalization from a subject-centered vs. agent-centered perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106, 115–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018. The participants as objects: Variation And Meaning Of First‐ And Second‐Person Object Encoding In Spanish. Studia Linguistica 72:3  pp. 571 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.