Cover not available
Part of
Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar
Edited by Jiyoung Yoon and Stefan Th. Gries
[Constructional Approaches to Language 19] 2016
► pp. 201–240

A multifactorial analysis of that/zero alternation

The diachronic development of the zero complementizer with think, guess and understand

| Bangor University
ORCID logo | University College Ghent
| Ghent University
This corpus-based study uses a stepwise logistic regression analysis to examine the diachronic development of that/zero alternation with three verbs of cognition, viz. think, guess and understand in both spoken and written corpora from 1560–2012. Eleven structural features which have been claimed in the literature to predict the presence of the zero complementizer form are tested to see if (1) there is indeed a diachronic trend towards more zero use, (2) whether the conditioning factors proposed in the literature indeed predict the zero form, (3) to what extent these factors interact and (4) whether the predictive power of the conditioning factors becomes stronger or weaker over time. The analysis disproves the hypothesis that there has been an overall diachronic development towards more zero use and that the interactions with verb type brings to light differences between verbs in terms of the predictive power of the individual structural features.
Published online: 8 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19.08sha
References (38)
References
Agresti, Alan. (2013). Categorical data analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. (1997). I think – an English modal particle. In T. Swan & O.J. Westwik (Eds.), Modality in germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1972). That’s that. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. (2007). Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31(3), 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger, & Tomasello, Michael. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 97–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dor, Daniel. (2005). Toward a semantic account of that-deletion in English. Linguistics, 43(2), 345–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsness, J. (1984). That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies, 65, 519–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward, & Biber, Douglas. (1985). That and zero complementizers in late modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. In B. Aarts & C.F. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English (pp. 241–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. (2007). The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In S.D. Smit, J. Hüttner, G. Kaltenböck, & U. Lutzky (Eds.), Tracing english through time. Explorations in language variation (pp. 99–114). Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (1980). The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language, 4(3), 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). Isomorphism in the grammatical code. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 47–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorrell, J.H. (1895). Indirect discourse in Anglo-Saxon. PMLA, 10, 342–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The cambridge grammar of the english language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Florian T., & Snider, Neal. (2008). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: surprisal and cumulativity. In B.C. Love, K. McRae, & V.N. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognitive science society conference (pp. 1061–1066). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. (2006). ‘… That is the question’: Complementizer omission in extraposed that-clauses. English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 371–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Position, prosody and scope: The case of English comment clauses. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(1), 3–38.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. (2007a). Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007b). Regional variation in the syntactic distribution of null finite complementizer. Language Variation and Change, 19, 295–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol II: Descriptive application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. (1985). Old english syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. (1985). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II: Complex constructions (pp. 42–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. (1999). Grammaticalization and social embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan ([1985] 1997). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. (1991). On the history of that zero in object clause links in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 272–289). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. (1996). Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Jennifer. (2005). No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in english dialects. English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 289–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. (2002). “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., & Mulac, Anthony. (1991a). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991b). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 313–339). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, & Walker, James A. (2009). On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that . Linguistics, 47(1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. (2010). A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49(2), 295–332.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. (1982). Complementation in middle English and the methodology of historical syntax. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Yaguchi, Michiko. (2001). The function of the non-deictic that in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1125–1155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Dora LaCasse
2024. Bilingual clause combining: A Variable Equivalence hypothesis for conjunction choice. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2020. Code-Switching Strategies: Prosody and Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
2019. Using the BNC and the Spoken BNC2014 to Study the Syntactic Development ofI ThinkandI’m Sure. English Studies 100:6 ► pp. 710 ff. DOI logo
Steuck, Jonathan & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2019. Chapter 14. Complementing in another language. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22], ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
PIJPOPS, DIRK, DIRK SPEELMAN, STEFAN GRONDELAERS & FREEK VAN DE VELDE
2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization. Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2017. Historical sociolinguistics and construction grammar. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.