Part of
Corpus-based Approaches to Construction GrammarEdited by Jiyoung Yoon and Stefan Th. Gries
[Constructional Approaches to Language 19] 2016
► pp. 201–240
Edited by Jiyoung Yoon and Stefan Th. Gries
[Constructional Approaches to Language 19] 2016
► pp. 201–240
A multifactorial analysis of that/zero alternation
The diachronic development of the zero complementizer with think, guess and understand
This corpus-based study uses a stepwise logistic regression analysis to examine the diachronic development of that/zero alternation with three verbs of cognition, viz. think, guess and understand in both spoken and written corpora from 1560–2012. Eleven structural features which have been claimed in the literature to predict the presence of the zero complementizer form are tested to see if (1) there is indeed a diachronic trend towards more zero use, (2) whether the conditioning factors proposed in the literature indeed predict the zero form, (3) to what extent these factors interact and (4) whether the predictive power of the conditioning factors becomes stronger or weaker over time. The analysis disproves the hypothesis that there has been an overall diachronic development towards more zero use and that the interactions with verb type brings to light differences between verbs in terms of the predictive power of the individual structural features.
References
Agresti, Alan
(2013) Categorical data analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.
Aijmer, Karin
(1997)
I think – an English modal particle. In T. Swan & O.J. Westwik (Eds.), Modality in germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 
Bolinger, Dwight
(1972) That’s that. The Hague: Mouton.
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
(2007) Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31(3), 569–606.
Brinton, Laurel J
(1996) Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan L
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–734.
Dehé, Nicole, & Wichmann, Anne
(2010) Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for uses as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language, 34(1), 36–74.
Diessel, Holger, & Tomasello, Michael
(2001) The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 97–141.
Dor, Daniel
(2005) Toward a semantic account of that-deletion in English. Linguistics, 43(2), 345–382.
Elsness, J
(1984)
That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies, 65, 519–533.
Finegan, Edward, & Biber, Douglas
(1985)
That and zero complementizers in late modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. In B. Aarts & C.F. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English (pp. 241–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, Olga
(2007) The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In S.D. Smit, J. Hüttner, G. Kaltenböck, & U. Lutzky (Eds.), Tracing english through time. Explorations in language variation (pp. 99–114). Vienna: Braumüller.
Givón, Talmy
(1995) Isomorphism in the grammatical code. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 47–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gorrell, J.H
(1895) Indirect discourse in Anglo-Saxon. PMLA, 10, 342–485.
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K
(2002) The cambridge grammar of the english language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaeger, Florian T., & Snider, Neal
(2008) Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: surprisal and cumulativity. In B.C. Love, K. McRae, & V.N. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognitive science society conference (pp. 1061–1066). Washington, DC.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
(2006) ‘… That is the question’: Complementizer omission in extraposed that-clauses. English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 371–396.
(2007) Position, prosody and scope: The case of English comment clauses. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(1), 3–38.
Kearns, Kate
(2007a) Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 475–505.
(2007b) Regional variation in the syntactic distribution of null finite complementizer. Language Variation and Change, 19, 295–336.
Langacker, Ronald W
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol II: Descriptive application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Mitchell, Bruce
(1985) Old english syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Noonan, Michael
(1985) Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II: Complex constructions (pp. 42–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palander-Collin, Minna
(1999) Grammaticalization and social embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
([1985] 1997) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rissanen, Matti
(1991) On the history of that zero in object clause links in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 272–289). London: Longman.
Rohdenburg, Günter
(1996) Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 149–182.
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Jennifer
(2005)
No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in english dialects. English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 289–309.
Thompson, Sandra A
(2002) “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–164.
Thompson, Sandra A., & Mulac, Anthony
(1991a) The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 237–251.
(1991b) A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 313–339). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, & Walker, James A
(2009) On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that
. Linguistics, 47(1), 1–43.
Van Bogaert, Julie
(2010) A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 399–427.
(2011)
I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49(2), 295–332.
Warner, Anthony R
(1982) Complementation in middle English and the methodology of historical syntax. London: Croom Helm.
Yaguchi, Michiko
(2001) The function of the non-deictic that in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1125–1155.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Hilpert, Martin
2017. Historical sociolinguistics and construction grammar. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 217 ff. 
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
2019. Using the BNC and the Spoken BNC2014 to Study the Syntactic Development ofI ThinkandI’m Sure. English Studies 100:6 ► pp. 710 ff.
PIJPOPS, DIRK, DIRK SPEELMAN, STEFAN GRONDELAERS & FREEK VAN DE VELDE
2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization. Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 514 ff.
Steuck, Jonathan & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2019. Chapter 14. Complementing in another language. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22], ► pp. 218 ff.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2020. Code-Switching Strategies: Prosody and Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.