Chapter published in:
Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages
Edited by Benjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructional Approaches to Language 22] 2018
► pp. 141164
References

References

Boas, H. C.
(2010) The Syntax-lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar: A case study of English communication verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 24, 54–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Watanabe, H.
(2016) Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1982) Frame Semantics. In (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp.111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company. Reprinted in D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp.373–400). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1988) The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 14, 35–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Inversion and Constructional Inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J. P. Koenig, & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation (pp.113–128). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
(2008) Border Conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar. In E. Bernal, & J. DeCesaris (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress (pp.49–68). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
(2013) Berkeley Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp.111–132). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhomieux, R.
(2012) The FrameNet Constructicon. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp.309–372). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C.
(2010) A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp.313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y.
(1996) Toward a description of te-linkage in Japanese. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions (pp.55–75). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y., Lee-Goldman, R. R., Ohara, K. H., Fujii, S., & Fillmore, C. J.
(2010) On expressing measurement and comparison in Japanese and English. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive Construction Grammars (pp.169–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
(1991) An On-line Computational Model of Human Sentence Interpretation: A Theory of the Representation and Use of Linguistic Knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation). Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ohara, K. H.
(2013) Toward Constructicon Building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas 17(1), pp.11–27.Google Scholar
(2014) Relating Frames and Constructions in Japanese FrameNet. In Proceedings of LREC 2014 (pp.2474–2477). Reykjavík: ELRA.Google Scholar
In Press). Internally headed relativization and its related constructions. In Y. Hasegawa Ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Japanese Linguistics Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Ohori, T.
(2002) (In Japanese) Cognitive Linguistics. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R. & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Retrieved from https://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/fndrupal​/the​_bookGoogle Scholar
Sköldberg, E., Bäckström, L., Borin, L., Forsberg, M., Lyngfelt, B., Olsson, L. -J., Prentice, J., Rydstedt, R., Tingsell, S., & Uppström, J.
(2013) Between Grammar and Dictionaries: a Swedish Constructicon. In Proceedings of eLex 2013 (pp.310–327). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T., Lage, L. M., Sampaio, T. F., Tavares, T. S., & Matos, E. E. S.
(2014) Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and Construction Grammar: Annotation policies for the Brazilian Portuguese Constructicon. Constructions and Frames, 6(1), 34–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Herbst, Thomas
2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 56 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.