Chapter published in:
Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction GrammarEdited by Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova
[Constructional Approaches to Language 27] 2020
► pp. 107–140
(Re)shaping the constructional network
Modeling shifts and reorganizations in the network hierarchy
This paper takes a dynamic perspective on
constructional networks by investigating which factors play a role
in the architecture of the network and how its internal structure
may be reorganized over time. It starts from the idea that the
network hierarchy is constantly being reconfigured: new
generalizations may give rise to new subschemas, and existing
subschemas can move up to a higher level or, conversely, subschemas
may marginalize and eventually disappear completely. Such network
shifts typically involve changes in schematicity (viz. the level of
abstractness) and/or productivity (viz. the extensibility of the
(sub)schema). An ideal candidate to investigate these productivity
shifts and internal reorganizations is the Dutch intensifying fake
reflexive resultative construction. In present-day Dutch, the
network of this construction displays an intriguing combination of
subschemas at different levels of abstraction, displaying varying
degrees of productivity, as well as conventionalized or even
fossilized micro-constructions. Tracing back the recent history of
this construction, the paper aims to show how mechanisms like
schematization and conventionalization work together in creating the
constructicon’s network structure, and how certain constructional
changes can be (re)interpreted as shifts within the constructional
network. It will be discussed what new insights can be gained from
such a network approach and which further steps may be taken to
further flesh out the theory on constructional networks.
Keywords: modal expressions, constructional networks, productivity, schematicity, intensification, Dutch, constructional reorganization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Tracking constructional changes: Empirical analysis of the Dutch intensifying fake reflexive
resultative construction
- 2.1Methodology
- 2.2Results: Diachronic frequency and productivity increase
- 3.A dynamic constructional network: Shifts at different levels of abstraction
- 3.1Expansion and schematization
- 3.1.1Case 1: Suf
- 3.1.2Case 2: Het vuur uit de sloffen
- 3.1.3Discussion
- 3.2Conventionalization and loss
- 3.2.1Case 3: Wild
- 3.1Expansion and schematization
- 4.Discussion: Challenges in constructional network theory
- 4.1Multiple representations
- 4.2Other types of links?
- 4.3Cognitive reality
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.03gys
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.03gys
References
Anshen, F., & Aronoff, M.
Barðdal, J.
Barðdal, J., & Gildea, S.
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K. E., & Sveen, A.
Bybee, J.
Bybee, J., & Thompson, S.
Colleman, T.
(2015) Constructionalization
and post-constructionalization: The constructional semantics
of the Dutch krijgen-passive from a
diachronic
perspective. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic
Construction
Grammar (pp. 213–255). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 

Croft, W.
De Clerck, B., & Colleman, T.
De Smet, H., D’hoedt, F., Fonteyn, L., & Van Goethem, K.
Diessel, H.
Gries, S. T.
Gyselinck, E.
Hilpert, M.
Hilpert, M., & Diessel, H.
Hoeksema, J.
Hopper, P. J.
Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S.
Jackendoff, R.
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
Lorenz, G.
Partington, A.
Perek, F.
Schmid, H.-J.
Stoffel, C.
Tagliamonte, S.
ten Buuren, M., van de Groep, M., Collin, S., Klatter, J., & de Hoop, H.
to
appear). Facking nice! Een
onderzoek naar de intensiteit van
intensiveerders. Nederlandse
Taalkunde.
Torrent, T. T.
(2015) On
the relation between inheritance and change: The
Constructional Convergence and the Construction Network
Reconfiguration
Hypotheses. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic
Construction
Grammar (pp. 173–211). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 

Traugott, E. C.
(2008b) Grammaticalization,
constructions and the incremental development of language:
Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in
English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation,
Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of
Language
Change (pp. 219–250). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
Trousdale, G.
Van de Velde, F.
van Trijp, R., & Steels, L.
von Mengden, F., & Coussé, E.
Zeldes, A.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
No author info given
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.