Part of
Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova
[Constructional Approaches to Language 27] 2020
► pp. 213242
Bosworth, J., Toller, T. N., Christ, S., & Tichý, O.
(2010) Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Prague: Faculty of Arts, Charles University. Retrieved from http://​www​.bosworthtoller​.com/
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, Special Volume 1, 28 pages.Google Scholar
Croft, W. A.
(2003) Lexical rules vs. Constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
(2010) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. Retrieved from https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/
(2013) Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. Retrieved from https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/now/
D’hoedt, F.
(2017) Language change in constructional networks: The development of the English Secondary Predicate Construction (PhD thesis). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.Google Scholar
D’hoedt, F., & Cuyckens, H.
(2017) The development of the as-Secondary Predicate Construction: Constructionalization and internalization. Language Sciences, 59, 16–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinu, G., Pham, N. T., & Baroni, M.
(2013) DISSECT – DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit. In Proceedings of the System Demonstrations of ACL 2013 (51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics). Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R.
(2004) The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language, 80(3), 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Hilpert, M.
(2008) The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbour clustering. Corpora, 3(1), 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrell Jr, F. E., & Dupont, C.
(2018) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. Retrieved from https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=Hmisc
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2005) Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höder, S.
(2018) Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in Contact: Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 37–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingham, R.
(2012) The Transmission of Anglo-Norman: Language history and language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, L.
(2002) Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In M. C. Jones & Esch (Eds.), Language Change (pp. 285–313). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A., & Taylor, A.
(2000) The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, Second Edition (PPCME2), release 3. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
Levin, B.
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Los, B.
(2005) The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McSparran, F., Schaffner, P., Latta, J., Pagliere, A., Powell, C., & Stoeffler, M.
(2001) Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/med/
Mitchell, B.
(1985) Old English Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online
(2018) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://​www​.oed​.com
Percillier, M.
(2016) Verb lemmatization and semantic verb classes in a Middle English corpus. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2016) (pp. 209–214). Retrieved from https://​www​.linguistics​.rub​.de​/konvens16​/pub​/26​_konvensproc​.pdf
(2018) A Toolkit for lemmatising, analysing, and visualising Middle English Data. In A. U. Frank, C. Ivanovic, F. Mambrini, M. Passarotti, & C. Sporleder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Corpus-Based Research in the Humanities CRH-2 (Vol. 1, pp. 153–160). Vienna. Retrieved from https://​www​.oeaw​.ac​.at​/fileadmin​/subsites​/academiaecorpora​/PDF​/CRH2​.pdf
Perek, F., & Hilpert, M.
(2017) A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(4), 490–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Randall, B.
(2010) Corpus Search (Version 2.003.00) [Computer Software]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://​corpussearch​.sourceforge​.net
R Core Team
(2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S., & Beths, F.
(2003) The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). York: University of York. Retrieved from http://​www​-users​.york​.ac​.uk​/~lang22​/YCOE​/YcoeHome​.htm
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trips, C., & Stein, A.
(2018) A comparison of multi-genre and single-genre corpora in the context of contact-induced change. In R. J. Whitt (Ed.), Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change (pp. 241–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Contact-Induced Changes in the Argument Structure of Middle English Verbs on the Model of Old French. Journal of Language Contact, 12(1), 232–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotter, D.
(2006a) Anglo-Norman Dictionary 2 Online edition. London: Modern Humanities Research Association. Retrieved from http://​www​.anglo​-norman​.net
(2006b) Anglo-Norman Online Hub. London: Modern Humanities Research Association. Retrieved from http://​www​.anglo​-norman​.net
Verkerk, A.
(2009) A semantic map of secondary predication. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 26, 115–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. T.
(2002) An historical syntax of the English language (4th ed.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zehentner, E.
(2018) Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics, 22(1), 149–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Laporte, Samantha, Tove Larsson & Larissa Goulart
2021. Testing the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction. Constructions and Frames 13:2  pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Middeke, Kirsten
2022. Sōþes ne wanda. The Avoidance is Separation Metaphor in West-Germanic Argument Structure. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias
2022. Extending structural priming to test constructional relations: Some comments and suggestions. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.