Chapter 2
Talking about giving
From experience to language in child language
How do children learn to think and talk about giving? Despite the
central role such verbs and their associated dative constructions
have played in linguistic and developmental theory, relatively few
studies have focused on how the linguistic and conceptual
underpinnings for giving events are first established. In this
paper, we present a study of the earliest utterances and
interactions involving transfer events, defined here as an
intentional transfer of possession or control. We elaborate the
structure of transfer scenes in terms of both its participant
structure and its different temporal phases, and catalogue the kinds
of linguistic constructions the participants use to negotiate and
coordinate their plans and actions. We then present a longitudinal
study of parent-child interactions from the Providence
Corpus, in which we have coded transfer events for
linguistic form (utterance, constructions, speaker), participant
structure (giver, recipient, gift), event phase, and pragmatic
function (self-initiated, cooperative initiation, request). Results
highlight several patterns, with the child using increasingly
better-formed language for each phase while also becoming an
increasingly active participant in initiating and managing transfer
scenes. This progression may indicate that the child has mastered
the “script” of such interactions, where the predictable nature of
the event structure provides a convenient entry point to language
(Nelson 2007). We
further observe extended interactions in which the phases above each
involve multiple steps; in these situations, it may instead be the
well-established language associated with simpler events that
provides the conceptual scaffold for the child to grasp more complex
events. Overall, our analysis illuminates how the complex event
structure of giving, and the variety of ways of talking about it,
provide the means for the concurrent development and mutual
reinforcement of language and conceptualization.
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Setting the stage: The development of give
- 1.1
Events in cognition and language
- 1.2Event-centered methodology
- 1.3Current goals
- 2.Data, representations and methods
- 2.1Data
- 2.2The giving scene
- 3.Detailed analyses
- 3.1From context to language: Contextual uptake of linguistic structure
- 3.2From language to concept
- 4.Joint action and interaction
- Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
References (29)
References
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.
Bruner, J. (1983). Child Talk :learning to use language. New York: Norton.
Budwig, N. (2003). Context and the dynamic construal of meaning in
early childhood. In Catherine Raeff & Janette B. Benson (Eds.), Social and Cognitive Development in the Context of
Individual, Social, and Cultural Processes. London and New York: Routledge.
Caët, S. (2013). Référence à soi et à l’interlocuteur chez des enfants
francophones et anglo- phones et leurs parents. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child-directed
speech. Cognitive science, 28. 843–873.
Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In Paul Fletcher & Michael Garman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: Studies in First Language
Development (pp. 339–55). Cambridge: CUP.
Choi, S. (1999). Early development of verb structures and
caregiver input in Korean: two case studies. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 241–265.
Chouinard, M.; Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative
evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30 (3), 637–669.
Clark, E.V. (1988). Constructions and conversation. Journal of Child Language, 25, 471–474.
Duranti, A. (1984). Intentions, Self and Local Theories of Meaning:
Words and Social Action in a Samoan Context. Center for Human Information Processing Report No.
122. La Jolla.
Evans, K. E., Demuth, K. (2012). Individual differences in pronoun reversal:
Evidence from two longitudinal case studies. Journal of child language, 39 (1), 162–191.
Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of
language. In Stevan R. Harnad, Horst D. Steklis, & Jane Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech (pp. 20–32). Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, Vol. 280.
Forrester, M. (2008). The Emergence of Self-Repair: A Case Study of One
Child During the Early Preschool Years. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41 (1), 99–128.
Gropen, J.; Pinker, S.; Hollander, M.; Goldberg, R.; and Wilson, R. (1989). The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative
Alternation in English. Language, Vol. 65, No. 2, 203–257.
Ingram, D. (1989). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
MacWhinney, B., (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd Edition. Vol. 2: The Database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mazurkewich, I., White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation:
Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, Volume 16, Issue 3, 261–283.
Morgenstern, A., Leroy, M. & Caët, S. (2013). Self- and other-repairs in child-adult
interaction at the intersection of pragmatic abilities and
language acquisition, Journal of Pragmatics, 151–167.
Morgenstern, A. & Chang, N. (2014). The blossoming of three-argument verbal
constructions in child language: a study of “give
constructions”. In Geneviève Girard-Gillet (Ed.). Autour du verbe. Construction – lexique –
evidentialité. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle. 107–120.
Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds Experience, Meaning and
Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ochs, E.; Schieffelin, B. (1989). “Language has a heart”. The pragmatics of affect,
Special issue of Text
9:1, 7–25.
Pine, J., Lieven, E. and Rowland, G. (1998). Comparing different models of the development of
the English verb category. Linguistics, 36: 4–40.
Scollon, R (1976). Conversations with a one-year old: A case study of the
developmental foundations of syntax. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Slobin, D. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making
capacity. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language
acquisition, Volume: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tatone, D., Geraci, A., Csibra, G. (2015). Giving and taking : Representational building
blocks of active resource-transfer events in human
infants. Cognition, 137, 47–62.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language, a usage-based theory of
language acquisition. Cambridge, M.A., Harvard University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Morgenstern, Aliyah
2022.
“Politeness Has a Heart”. In
Rethinking Politeness with Henri Bergson,
► pp. 65 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.