Cover not available
Part of
Multimodal Communication from a Construction Grammar Perspective
Edited by Kiki Nikiforidou and Mirjam Fried
[Constructional Approaches to Language 38] 2025
► pp. 251–284

Contrastive negation constructions in Israeli Hebrew

A multimodal approach

| Tel Aviv University
This study explores the functions of Hebrew Contrastive Negation constructions (CNs), which are usually considered grammatical patterns that combine the rejection of an accessible background assumption or an accessible claim in the discourse via its substitution, with the two being construed as alternatives. The study elaborates on discourse contexts that require the use of such constructions and shows that the pragmatics of CN motivate not only the existence of the construction, but also the choice of the particular gestural patterns coordinated with it. In line with the recent developments of multimodal accounts of constructions (e.g., Lanwer, 2017; Schoonjans, 2017; Steen & Turner, 2013; Zima & Bergs, 2017), I propose that co-speech gestures should be viewed as an integral part of CNs in Hebrew.
Keywords: contrastive negation, multimodal Construction Grammar, gesture, Israeli Hebrew
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Contexts of use and gestural patterns
  • 4.Idiosyncratic referential gestures
  • 5.Referential distinction
  • 6.Pragmatic gestures
  • 7.Summary and concluding remarks
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (92)
References
André, E. et al. (2011). Non-verbal persuasion and communication in an affective agent. In R. Cowie, C. Pelachaud, & P. Petta (Eds.), Emotion-oriented systems [Cognitive Technologies] (pp. 585–608). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azar, M. (1999). Argumentative structures. In R. Ben-Shahar, & G. Toury (Eds.), Hebrew — a living language, 2 (pp.9–23). Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad. [In Hebrew]Google Scholar
Bardenstein, R. (2021). Persistent argumentative discourse markers: The case of Hebrew rectification-marker be-ˁecem (‘actually’). Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 254–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardenstein, R., & Ariel, M. (2019). Hebrew Ela (‘but’) in the Mishnah and in Modern Hebrew. Balshanut Ivrit [Hebrew Linguistics], 73, 45–61. [In Hebrew]Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D. (2009). Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with parallel-opposition constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2271–2294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.) (2009). Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body — language — communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 38.2) (pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2008). From Left to Right…Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture [Gesture Studies, 3] (pp. 27–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2010). Multimodal metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron, & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 195–214). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2021). From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodological exploration of forms and functions. Languages and Modalities, 1, 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, R. (2020). Stability and visibility in embodiment: The ‘Palm Up’ in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 190–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K. (2014). Body-directed gestures: Pointing to the self and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Abner, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). The Palm-Up puzzle: Meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign. Frontiers in Communication, 3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2014). “Don’t get me wrong”: Recipient design by using negation to constrain an action’s interpretation. In S. Günthner, W. Imo, & J. Bücker (Eds.), Grammar and dialogism: Sequential, syntactic, and prosodic patterns between emergence and sedimentation (pp. 15–51). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A., & De Stefani, E. (2019). Defining in talk-in-interaction: Recipient-design through negative definitional components. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 140–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (1985). Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stance taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1989). Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich, & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J. P. Koenig, & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation (pp. 113–128). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried, & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in cross-language perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 2] (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gates, Jr., D. L., & Seright, O. D. (1967). Negative-contrastive constructions in standard modern English. American Speech, 42(2), 136–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geva, Y., & Inbar, A. (forthcoming). The Hand(s) on Chest gesture in Hebrew face-to-face interaction.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Pérez, R. (2008). A cross-cultural analysis of heart metaphors. Revista alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 25–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heylen, D. (2005). Challenges ahead: Head movements and other social acts in conversation. In L. Halle, P. Wallis, S. Woods, S. Marsella, C. Pelachaud, & D. K. J. Heylen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Virtual Social Agents (pp. 45–52). The Society for the Study of Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61(1), 121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Inbar, A. (2014). Toward a logic of gestures. MA thesis. Tel Aviv University.
(2017). Coordination in gestures: From abstraction to perceptibility. 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-14), University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.Google Scholar
(2022). The Raised Index Finger gesture in Hebrew multimodal interaction. Gesture, 21(2/3), 264–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming1). Visualizing discourse functions: The analysis of gestures associated with List Constructions in Israeli Hebrew.
(forthcoming2). Interactional practices accomplished by pointing at the addressee in Hebrew face-to-face interaction. In: G. Brône, K. Feyaerts, E. Zima, and S. Ladewig (Eds.), Stance-Taking in Embodied and Virtual Interaction (Frontiers in Psychology).
Inbar, A. & Cienki, A. (2021). The raised index finger in Hebrew talk-in-interaction. 17th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA), Winterthur, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Inbar, A., & Maschler, Y. (2023). Shared knowledge as an account for disaffiliative moves: Hebrew ki ‘because’-clauses accompanied by the Palm Up Open Hand gesture. Research on Language and Social interaction, 56(2), 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inbar, A., & Shor, L. (2019). Covert negation in Israeli Hebrew: Evidence from co-speech gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 85–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming). The depiction of ‘negativity’: The case of the Brushing Hands gesture used by Hebrew speakers. In F. Blanchette, & C. Lukyanenko (Eds.), Perspectives on negation: Views from across the language sciences [Interdisciplinary Linguistics]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logo
Jasinskaja, K. (2012). Correction by adversative and additive markers. Lingua, 122(15), 1899–1918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. (2002). English subjectless tagged sentences. Language, 78, 453–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visual action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1971). If’s, and’s, and but’s about conjunction. In C. J. Fillmore, & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 115–150). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanwer, J. P. (2017). Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory. Linguistics Vanguard, special issue, 3(s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2020). Proposing a revised functional classification of pragmatic gestures. Lingua, 247, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W., & Thompson, A. S. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281.Google Scholar
Marrese, O. H., Raymond, C. W., Fox, B. A., Ford, C. E., & Pielke, M. (2021). The grammar of obviousness: The Palm-Up gesture in argument sequences. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 663067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Y., & Estlein, R. (2008). Stance-taking in Hebrew causal conversation via be’emet (really, actually, indeed, lit. ‘in truth’). Discourse Studies, 10(3), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. (1991). Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 27(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2006). Challenges of multimodality: Language and body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures. Their origins and distribution. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In C. Müller, & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. (2004). The conventionalization of the Ring Gesture in German discourse. In C. Müller, & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures [Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998] (pp. 217–224). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5(1/2), 219–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payrató, L., & Teꞵendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body — language — communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 38.2] (pp. 1531–1539). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, G. (2014). Inclined to better understanding — the coordination of talk and ‘leaning forward’ in doing repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, S. (2017). Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, special issue, 3(s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shor, L. (2019). Negation in Israeli Hebrew. In R. Berman (Ed.), Usage-based studies in Modern Hebrew (pp. 583–621). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Silvennoinen, O. (2013). Shaken, not stirred: A Constructional Grammar account of contrastive negation in English. MA thesis. University of Helsinki.
(2017). Not only apples but also oranges: Contrastive negation and register. In T. Hiltunen, J. McVeigh, & T. Säily (Eds.), Big and rich data in English corpus linguistics: Methods and explorations: Helsinki: VARIENG.Google Scholar
(2018). Constructional schemas in variation: modelling contrastive negation. Constructions and Frames, 10(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). From constructions to functions and back: Contrastive negation in English and Finish. Folia Linguistica, 54(1), 45–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (1985). Perception of unity, persistence, and identity: Thoughts on infants’ conceptions of objects. In J. Mehler, & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 89–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. J., & Wein, D. (1995). Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(2), 113–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, F., & Tuner, M. (2013). Multimodal construction grammar. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 255–274). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (1995). On projection. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Interaction and social intelligence (pp. 84–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teꞵendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and metaphoric — combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analyses of the Brushing Aside Gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body — language — communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2] (pp. 1540–1558). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2022). Discourse structuring markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, special issue, 3(s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar