Locative Alternation
A lexical-constructional approach
| Osaka City University
The aim of the present volume is two-fold: to give a coherent account of the locative alternation in English, and to develop a constructional theory that overcomes a number of problems in earlier constructional accounts. The lexical-constructional account proposed here is characterized by two main features. On the one hand, it emphasizes the need for a detailed examination of verb meanings. On the other, it introduces lower-level constructions such as verb-class-specific constructions and verb-specific constructions, and makes full use of these lower-level constructions in accounting for alternation phenomena. Rather than being a completely new version of construction grammar, the proposed lexical-constructional account is an automatic consequence of the basic tenet of constructional approaches as being usage-based.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 6] 2008. xiv, 239 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
xiii–xiv
|
|
Chapter 1. Introduction
|
1–10
|
|
Chapter 2. Two previous analyses
|
11–26
|
|
Chapter 3. A lexical-constructional account of the locative alternation
|
27–52
|
|
Chapter 4. More on the location-as-object variant
|
53–64
|
|
Chapter 5. Another look at putative non-alternating cases
|
65–86
|
|
Chapter 6. The locative alternation and verb meaning
|
87–100
|
|
Chapter 7. Types of verb meaning and types of alternation
|
101–118
|
|
Chapter 8. Further issues
|
119–132
|
|
Chapter 9. The locative alternation with verbs of removal
|
133–148
|
|
Chapter 10. Morphologically complex cases
|
149–168
|
|
Chapter 11. The locative alternation in Japanese
|
169–206
|
|
Chapter 12. Summary and conclusion
|
207–212
|
|
References
|
213–219
|
|
Notes
|
221–231
|
|
Index of names
|
233
|
|
Index of subjects
|
235
|
|
Index of verbs
|
237
|
|
Index of constructions
|
239
|
“Winner of the 2009 "English Linguistics Society in Japan" Award.”
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2008. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED.
English Language and Linguistics 12:3 ► pp. 553 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],
No author info given
2015.
In Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 17],
No author info given
2020.
In English Resultatives [Constructional Approaches to Language, 26],
No author info given
2020.
In Frame-Constructional Verb Classes [Constructional Approaches to Language, 28],
Beavers, John
2017.
In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014.
In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15],
► pp. 1 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2018.
In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24],
► pp. 5 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Alexander Ziem
2018.
In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22],
► pp. 183 ff.
Cortés-Rodriguez, Francisco J.
2016. Revisiting Aktionsart types for lexical classes.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 498 ff.
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice.
Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2014.
In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15],
► pp. 181 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2019.
In English Comparative Correlatives,
Ishizaki, Yasuaki
2020.
In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214],
► pp. 144 ff.
IWATA, SEIZI
2014. ASPECT AND FORCE DYNAMICS: WHICH IS MORE ESSENTIAL TO RESULTATIVES?.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 31:1 ► pp. 234 ff.
Kiyama, Naoki
2017. When tense meets constructional meaning.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Kuo, Pei-Jung
2019. On locative alternation verbs in Mandarin Chinese.
Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Levin, Beth
2015. Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Liu, Mei-chun & Jui-ching Chang
2016.
In 2016 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP),
► pp. 30 ff.
Luzondo Oyón, Alba
2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Mateu, Jaume
2017.
In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120],
► pp. 52 ff.
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
2018. The decade construction rivalry in Russian.
Diachronica 35:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten
2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 354 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Ignasi Miró Sastre
2019. On the cognitive grounding of agent-deprofiling constructions as a case of pretense constructions.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 573 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Alba Luzondo Oyón & Paula Pérez Sobrino
2017.
In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],
► pp. 1 ff.
WIECHMANN, DANIEL & ELMA KERZ
2016. Formulaicity as a determinant of processing efficiency: investigating clause ordering in complex sentences.
English Language and Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Xia, Xiaorong
2014. Syntactic Variants of Caused-motion Event.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:1
Zinova, Yulia
2014.
In Pristine Perspectives on Logic, Language, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8607],
► pp. 49 ff.
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
2019.
In Grammatical Voice,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General