Representing contextual factors in language change

Between frames and constructions

Mirjam Fried | Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague

Published online: 17 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.04fri

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Matsumoto, Yoshiko

2015. Partnership between grammatical construction and interactional frame. Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 289 ff.

Matsumoto, Yoshiko

2018. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. 75 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2018. Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 543 ff.

Schirato, Giovanna

2016. I corpora diacronici delle lingue romanze. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 51:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

Smirnova, Elena

2015. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 81 ff.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs

2014. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162], ► pp. 87 ff.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs

2014. Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Trousdale, Graeme

2016. Response to Wärnsby. Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 54 ff.

Wärnsby, Anna

2016. On the adequacy of a constructionist approach to modality. Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 40 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.