Article published In:
Concepts and TransformationVol. 7:2 (2002) ► pp.117–139
Action research
Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges
This article examines how and why the academically-based social sciences, both pure and applied, have lost their relevance to practical human affairs (praxis) and links this discussion to the reasons why action research is a marginal activity in the academic and policy worlds. It also contains a harsh critique of action research practice focused on action researchers’ combined sense of moral superiority over conventional researchers and general complacency about fundamental issues of theory, method, and validity. The central argument is that “doing good” is not the same as “doing good social research” and that we action researchers need to hold ourselves accountable to higher standards, not only to compete with conventional social research but for the benefit of the non-academic stakeholders in action research projects.
Keywords: Action research, phronesis, positivism, universities
Cited by (64)
Cited by 64 other publications
Casey, Mary, Áine Carroll, David Coghlan & Diarmuid Stokes
2024. Appraising Quality in Action Research in Healthcare Settings. IJAR – International Journal of Action Research 20:1-2024 ► pp. 27 ff. 
Zandee, Danielle P & David Coghlan
2024. Action research for impact in addressing the grand challenges. Strategic Organization
Coghlan, David & Abraham B. (Rami) Shani
2023. Creating and Building Shared Scholarship in Organization Development and Change: A Metalogue. In Research in Organizational Change and Development [Research in Organizational Change and Development, ], ► pp. 73 ff.
Neumann, W.P. & N. Purdy
2023. The better work, better care framework: 7 strategies for sustainable healthcare system process improvement. Health Systems 12:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
Davison, Robert M., Maris G. Martinsons & Louie H. M. Wong
2022. The ethics of action research participation. Information Systems Journal 32:3 ► pp. 573 ff.
Bell-Martin, Rebecca V. & Jerome F. Marston
2021. Confronting Selection Bias: The Normative and Empirical Risks of Data Collection in Violent Contexts. Geopolitics 26:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
Garavaglia, Emma, Francesco Marcaletti, Tatiana Iñiguez-Berrozpe & Heike Schroder
2021. Action Research in Age Management: The Quality of Ageing at Work Model. Work, Aging and Retirement 7:4 ► pp. 339 ff.
Lindhult, Erik & Karin Axelsson
2021. The logic and integration of coproductive research approaches. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 14:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Shani, Abraham B. (Rami) & David Coghlan
2021. Action research in business and management: A reflective review. Action Research 19:3 ► pp. 518 ff.
Cummings, Thomas G. & Chailin Cummings
2020. The Relevance Challenge in Management and Organization Studies: Bringing Organization Development Back In. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 56:4 ► pp. 521 ff.
Smith, Natalie
2020. Emerging from the swamp: an autoethnography on the legitimacy of action research. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 14:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
Thurber, Amie, Leslie Collins, Marilyn Greer, Demetrese McKnight & Darlene Thompson
2020. Resident experts: The potential of critical Participatory Action Research to inform public housing research and practice. Action Research 18:4 ► pp. 414 ff.
Stylianou, Polyxeni & Michalinos Zembylas
2019. Ethical and political dimensions of action research and lesson study: reflections from a research project on a controversial issue in Cyprus. Educational Action Research 27:4 ► pp. 581 ff.
Burman, Anders
2018. Are anthropologists monsters? An Andean dystopian critique of extractivist ethnography and Anglophone-centric anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8:1-2 ► pp. 48 ff.
Eito Mateo, Antonio, M. José Gómez Poyato & Chaime Marcuello Servós
2018. e-Social work in practice: a case study. European Journal of Social Work 21:6 ► pp. 930 ff.
Frauenberger, Christopher, Marcus Foth & Geraldine Fitzpatrick
2018. Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, ► pp. 1 ff.
Fruijtier, Elisabeth
2018. Action Research and Open Innovation. In Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Action Research and Action Learning [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ], ► pp. 19 ff.
Hamet, Joanne & Sylvie Michel
2018. Rigor, relevance, and the knowledge “market”. European Business Review 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Sarrica, M., M. Richter, S. Thomas, I. Graham & B.M. Mazzara
2018. Social approaches to energy transition cases in rural Italy, Indonesia and Australia: Iterative methodologies and participatory epistemologies. Energy Research & Social Science 45 ► pp. 287 ff.
Whitehurst, Fiona & Paul Richter
2018. Engaged scholarship in small firm and entrepreneurship research: Grappling with Van de Ven’s diamond model in retrospect to inform future practice. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 36:4 ► pp. 380 ff.
Villumsen, Anne Marie & Ole Steen Kristensen
2016. From management to leadership: a shift towards understanding the organizational complexity of multidisciplinary collaboration. European Journal of Social Work 19:5 ► pp. 616 ff.
Gearty, Margaret R, Hilary Bradbury-Huang & Peter Reason
2015. Learning history in an open system: Creating histories for sustainable futures. Management Learning 46:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Gorli, Mara, Davide Nicolini & Giuseppe Scaratti
2015. Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship. Human Relations 68:8 ► pp. 1347 ff.
Gubbins, Claire & Denise M. Rousseau
2015. Embracing Translational HRD Research for Evidence-Based Management: Let's Talk About How to Bridge the Research-Practice Gap. Human Resource Development Quarterly 26:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Kieser, Alfred, Alexander Nicolai & David Seidl
2015. The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program. Academy of Management Annals 9:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Kieser, Alfred, Alexander Nicolai & David Seidl
2015. The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program. The Academy of Management Annals 9:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Helskog, Guro Hansen
2014. Justifying action research. Educational Action Research 22:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Johnson, Hannes, Mikael Johansson & Karin Andersson
2014. Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 66 ► pp. 317 ff.
Mathijssen, Carmen & Danny Wildemeersch
2014. Research as Response: Methodological Reflections. In Civic Learning, Democratic Citizenship and the Public Sphere, ► pp. 91 ff.
Levin, Morten
2012. Academic integrity in action research. Action Research 10:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Neumann, W.P., S.M. Dixon & M. Ekman
2012. Ergonomics action research I: shifting from hypothesis testing to experiential learning. Ergonomics 55:10 ► pp. 1127 ff.
Neumann, W.P. & J. Village
2012. Ergonomics action research II: a framework for integrating HF into work system design. Ergonomics 55:10 ► pp. 1140 ff.
Oral, Muhittin
2012. Action research contextualizes DEA in a multi-organizational decision-making process. Expert Systems with Applications 39:7 ► pp. 6503 ff.
Coghlan, David
2011. Action Research: Exploring Perspectives on a Philosophy of Practical Knowing. Academy of Management Annals 5:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Coghlan, David
2011. Action Research: Exploring Perspectives on a Philosophy of Practical Knowing. Academy of Management Annals 5:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Nicolai, Alexander T., Ann-Christine Schulz & Markus Göbel
2011. Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 47:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Rod, Michel
2011. Subjective personal introspection in action‐oriented research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 6:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Rappert, Brian
2010. Revealing and concealing secrets in research: the potential for the absent. Qualitative Research 10:5 ► pp. 571 ff.
RAPPERT, BRIAN
2010. Making Silence Matter: The Place of the Absences in Ethnography. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2010:1 ► pp. 260 ff.
Fuller-Rowell, Thomas E.
2009. Multi-site action research. Action Research 7:4 ► pp. 363 ff.
Grasselli, Nóra Ilona
2009. Lehet akciókutatásból doktorálni? – Eszményképek kontra valóság. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review ► pp. 65 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann, James Karlsen, Roger Normann & Jens Kristian Fosse
2009. The contradictory nature of knowledge: a challenge for understanding innovation in a local context and workplace development and for doing action research. AI & SOCIETY 23:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Kieser, Alfred & Lars Leiner
2009. Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies 46:3 ► pp. 516 ff.
Kieser, Alfred & Lars Leiner
2013. Können Kommunikationsprobleme zwischen Managementwissenschaftlern und Praktikern in gemeinsamen Forschungsprojekten überwunden werden?. In Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations, ► pp. 279 ff.
Walji, Nazir
2009. Leadership: an action research approach. AI & SOCIETY 23:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Hildrum, Jarle & Geir Liavåg Strand
2007. Overcoming Challenges in Writing About Action Research—The Promise of the Development Story. Systemic Practice and Action Research 20:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Levin, Morten & Johan E. Ravn
2007. Involved in Praxis and Analytical at a Distance. Systemic Practice and Action Research 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
RAM, MONDER, NICK THEODORAKOPOULOS & IAN WORTHINGTON
2007. POLICY TRANSFER IN PRACTICE: IMPLEMENTING SUPPLIER DIVERSITY IN THE UK. Public Administration 85:3 ► pp. 779 ff.
Sæther, Bjørnar
2007. From Researching Regions at a Distance to Participatory Network Building: Integrating Action Research and Economic Geography. Systemic Practice and Action Research 20:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Boser, Susan
2006. Ethics and power in community-campus partnerships for research. Action Research 4:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Foth, Marcus
2006. Network action research. Action Research 4:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Paul Hager, Kalliola, Satu, Risto Nakari & Ilkka Pesonen
2006. Learning to make changes: democratic dialogue in action. Journal of Workplace Learning 18:7/8 ► pp. 464 ff.
Hilsen, Anne Inga
2006. And they shall be known by their deeds. Action Research 4:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann
2005. Action research and knowledge co-generation: a not so dangerous liaison with conventional social research. AI & SOCIETY 19:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann, Roger Normann & Jens Kristian Fosse
2005. Reflexive democracy: creating actionable knowledge through regional development coalitions. AI & SOCIETY 19:4 ► pp. 442 ff.
Teram, Eli, Candice L. Schachter & Carol A. Stalker
2005. The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice. Qualitative Health Research 15:8 ► pp. 1129 ff.
Dick, Bob
2004. Action research literature. Action Research 2:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Dick, Bob
2015. Reflections on the SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research and what it says about action research and its methodologies. Action Research 13:4 ► pp. 431 ff.
Wakeford, Tom & Michel Pimbert
2004. Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge. Action Research 2:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Boog, Ben W. M.
2003. The emancipatory character of action research, its history and the present state of the art. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 13:6 ► pp. 426 ff.
Brydon-Miller, Mary, Davydd Greenwood & Patricia Maguire
2003. Why Action Research?. Action Research 1:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Gustavsen, Bjørn
2003. New Forms of Knowledge Production and the Role of Action Research. Action Research 1:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Gustavsen, Bjørn
2014. Social impact and the justification of action research knowledge. Action Research 12:4 ► pp. 339 ff.
Gustavsen, Bjørn
2020. Action research and the problem of the single case. International Journal of Action Research 16:1-2020 ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.