Article published In:
Concepts and TransformationVol. 7:2 (2002) ► pp.141–192
Discourse democracy at work
On public spheres in private enterprises
This article presents an empirically based argument for what I have labeled ‘discourse democracy at work’. The idea of discourse democracy at work is launched to supplement the various representative models of democracy we find in European working life. Starting with a brief elaboration of the concept of public sphere, the article presents a number of reasons why all parties in working life can benefit from applying some kind of internal public spheres within private enterprises. The experiences gained over 20 years with an agreement between the labor market parties in Norway, on enterprise development based on broad participation from the employees, forms the basis for a more detailed presentation of how discourse democracy at work may be put into practice. The concluding section presents some principal arguments as to why a strategy for discourse democracy is particularly apt today — in a working life characterized by trends like increasing knowledge industries, individualism on the personal level and globalization on the societal level.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Angel, Sanne, Randi Steensgaard, Raymond Kolbaek & Søren Frimann
2023. Competing discourses as barriers to change in rehabilitation nursing: a discourse analysis. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 4 
Fricke, Werner, Davydd J. Greenwood, Miren Larrea & Danilo Streck
2022. On Social Productivity and Future Perspectives on Action Research. IJAR – International Journal of Action Research 18:1-2022 ► pp. 8 ff.
Streck, Danilo & Miren Larrea
2022. 40 years in 40 minutes. Interview with Øyvind Pålshaugen. IJAR – International Journal of Action Research 18:1-2022 ► pp. 79 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr. Garmann, Clare Hildebrandt, Hildegunn Aslaksen, Richard Ennals & Jon P. Knudsen
2021. The Dialogical Approach to Workplace Innovation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Innovation, ► pp. 155 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Christian Garmann, Richard Ennals & Halvor Holtskog
2017. Balancing Organisational Design Principles: A Pragmatic Scandinavian Approach to CSR. In Stages of Corporate Social Responsibility [CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, ], ► pp. 163 ff.
Eikeland, Olav
2012. Action research and organisational learning: a Norwegian approach to doing action research in complex organisations. Educational Action Research 20:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Leinonen, Minna
2012. Challenging and reinforcing gender boundaries at work. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31:7 ► pp. 633 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann, James Karlsen, Roger Normann & Jens Kristian Fosse
2009. The contradictory nature of knowledge: a challenge for understanding innovation in a local context and workplace development and for doing action research. AI & SOCIETY 23:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Ataöv, Anli
2008. Constructing Co-generative Search Processes: Re-thinking Urban Planning/Making Urban Plans Actionable. European Planning Studies 16:6 ► pp. 829 ff.
Paul Hager, Kalliola, Satu, Risto Nakari & Ilkka Pesonen
2006. Learning to make changes: democratic dialogue in action. Journal of Workplace Learning 18:7/8 ► pp. 464 ff.
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann
2005. Action research and knowledge co-generation: a not so dangerous liaison with conventional social research. AI & SOCIETY 19:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Leirvik, Birgit
2005. Dialogue and power: the use of dialogue for participatory change. AI & SOCIETY 19:4 ► pp. 407 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.