Vol. 8:3 (2003) ► pp.255–263
Rehabilitating action research
A response to Davydd Greenwood’s and Björn Gustavsen’s papers on action research perspectives in Concepts and Transformation, 7(2), 2002 and 8(1), 2003
In this brief response I address four topics. In the first place I suggest that single-case action research has a useful contribution to make. In my view, so does action research on the smallest scale: applied to improving the practice of a single practitioner. A second topic is the difficulty of avoiding marginalisation if you are one of those who seek to keep their research practically meaningful. A third one consists of some reasons for my seemingly greater optimism. Finally I try to provide from my own experience some practical measures which can be taken.
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.06dic
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.