This paper discusses the problem of destructive emotions by comparing Eastern and Western assumptions about emotions. In the case of anger, for example, Eastern thinkers straightforwardly posit that it is entirely possible to cultivate attitudes in which anger is naturally absent. In the West, by contrast, it is generally assumed that anger is a “basic” emotion that can be suppressed or managed, but not eliminated from one’s basic emotional constitution. Thus, in the Eastern way of thinking, emotion is a force that more easily harmonizes with rational approaches to life and to the specific problems in life.
2019. The Practices of Forgiving: Replies. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:3 ► pp. 336 ff.
de Silva, Padmasiri
2017. Embodied Emotions and Body–Mind Reactivity. In Emotions and The Body in Buddhist Contemplative Practice and Mindfulness-Based Therapy, ► pp. 31 ff.
de Silva, Padmasiri
2020. Emotion Profiles: Anger. In Mindfulness-based Emotion Focused Counselling, ► pp. 17 ff.
de Silva, Padmasiri
2020. Developing a Moral Psychology of Emotions: A Prologemena. In Mindfulness-based Emotion Focused Counselling, ► pp. 225 ff.
Flanagan, Owen & Robert Anthony Williams
2010. What Does the Modularity of Morals Have to Do With Ethics? Four Moral Sprouts Plus or Minus a Few. Topics in Cognitive Science 2:3 ► pp. 430 ff.
Graham, George & G. Lynn Stephens
2007. Psychopathology. In Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science, ► pp. 339 ff.
Faucher, Luc
2006. Philosophie psychopathologique : un survol. Philosophiques 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.