Chapter published in:
Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics
Edited by Natalie Depraz and Agnès Celle
[Consciousness & Emotion Book Series 11] 2019
► pp. 4356


Culioli, Antoine
(1990) La négation: marqueurs et opérations. In Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Tome 1 (pp. 91–113). Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(1990) The Concept of Notional Domain. In Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Tome 1 (pp. 67–82). Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(1995) Cognition and representation in linguistic theory. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science v. 112). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
(2004) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online: http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc/.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
(1997) Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, pp. 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) The mirative and evidentiality,. Journal of Pragmatics 33, pp. 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vogüé, Sarah
(1992) Aux frontières des domaines notionnels: bien que, quoique et encore que . L’Information Grammaticale, 55, pp. 23–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filippi-Deswelle, Catherine
(2015) Les degrés de la surprise. In La surprise. A l’épreuve des langues. (pp. 219–238). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan
(2012) ‘Mirativity’ does not exist: hdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16 (3): pp. 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
(1999) Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3, pp. 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Sidney, Greenbaum
(1973) A university grammar of English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Ranger, Graham
(2007) Continuity and discontinuity in discourse. Notes on yet and still . In Celle, A. et Huart, R. (ed.), Connectives as Discourse Landmarks (pp. 177–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar