Part of
The Shared Mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivityEdited by Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12] 2008
► pp. 245–276
Edited by Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12] 2008
► pp. 245–276
11. First communions: Mimetic sharing without theory of mind
It is widely held that the gradual development of metarepresentational Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities constituted at least one important hominid upgrade. Are such abilities really needed to explain hominid (i) tool-making, (ii) social cohesion, or even (iii) basic interpretative and language formation/learning capabilities? I propose an alternative explanation of what underlies these sophisticated capacities – the Mimetic Ability Hypothesis (MAH). MAH claims that a vastly increased capacity for recreative imagination best explains the kinds of sophisticated intersubjective engagements of which hominids would have been capable – and that these constituted an important basis for the development of complex language. This proposal puts the idea of the evolution of ToM devices under considerable strain.
How did humans bridge the tremendous gap between symbolic thought and the nonsymbolic forms of intelligence that still dominate the rest of the animal kingdom? Merlin Donald, Origins of the Modern Mind
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Placiński, Marek, Przemysław Żywiczyński, Theresa Matzinger, Marta Sibierska, Monika Boruta-Żywiczyńska, Anna Szala & Sławomir Wacewicz
2023. Evolution of Pantomime in Dyadic Interaction. A Motion Capture Study. Journal of Language Evolution 
Berio, Leda
2021. Culturally embedded schemata for false belief reasoning. Synthese 199:1-2 ► pp. 285 ff.
Wacewicz, Sławomir & Przemysław Żywiczyński
2021. Pantomimic Conceptions of Language Origins. In Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, ► pp. 701 ff.
Wacewicz, Sławomir & Przemysław Żywiczyński
2024. Chapter 4. Two types of bodily-mimetic communication. In Perspectives on Pantomime [Advances in Interaction Studies, 12], ► pp. 100 ff.
Garofoli, Duilio & Antonis Iliopoulos
2019. Replacing Epiphenomenalism: a Pluralistic Enactive Take on the Metaplasticity of Early Body Ornamentation. Philosophy & Technology 32:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Abramova, Ekaterina
2018. The role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive bases and an alternative. Journal of Language Evolution 3:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Garofoli, Duilio
2018. RECkoning with representational apriorism in evolutionary cognitive archaeology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17:5 ► pp. 973 ff.
Garofoli, Duilio
2019. Embodied Cognition and the Archaeology of Mind: A Radical Reassessment. In Handbook of Evolutionary Research in Archaeology, ► pp. 379 ff.
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Marta Sibierska
2018. Defining Pantomime for Language Evolution Research. Topoi 37:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Fenici, Marco & Duilio Garofoli
2017. The biocultural emergence of mindreading: integrating cognitive archaeology and human development. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 1:2 ► pp. 89 ff.
Unternbäumen, Enrique Huelva
2017. The codification of intersubjectivity in the diachronic change AD locative > A(D) indirect object in Spanish. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Thibault, Paul J.
2011. First-Order Languaging Dynamics and Second-Order Language: The Distributed Language View. Ecological Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 210 ff.
Zlatev, Jordan
2010. Phenomenology and Cognitive Linguistics. In Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, ► pp. 415 ff.
Hutto, Daniel D.
2007. Folk Psychology Without Theory or Simulation. In Folk Psychology Re-Assessed, ► pp. 115 ff.
Hutto, Daniel D.
2008. The Narrative Practice Hypothesis: clarifications and implications. Philosophical Explorations 11:3 ► pp. 175 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.