Article published in:
Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectivesEdited by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid van Alphen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15] 2012
► pp. 203–228
Quotation in sign languages
A visible context shift
Annika Herrmann | University of Göttingen
Markus Steinbach | University of Göttingen
Assuming that quoting utterances and thoughts is a universal property of natural languages, sign languages are also expected to have various linguistic means to mark quotation. Like spoken languages, sign languages have regular forms of indirect reported speech. However, sign languages mostly draw on a specific grammatical means for quotation called role shift. Role shift is a particularly interesting form of reported speech that combines properties of both direct and indirect speech. Based on a pilot corpus study, we discuss the formal and functional properties of role shift in German Sign Language (DGS). We argue that role shift can be analyzed as a nonmanual agreement operator that overtly agrees with the signer and the addressee of the reported utterance and triggers a context shift from the actual context to the context of the reported utterance.
Published online: 01 May 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.12her
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.12her
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
2016.
In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,
Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 223 ff.
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
2015. Rethinking constructed action.
Sign Language & Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Davidson, Kathryn
2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity.
Linguistics and Philosophy 38:6 ► pp. 477 ff.
Frederiksen, Anne Therese & Rachel I. Mayberry
2019. Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions.
Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Haiman, John
2020.
In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,
► pp. 291 ff.
Herrmann, Annika & Nina-Kristin Pendzich
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 275 ff.
Hübl, Annika, Emar Maier & Markus Steinbach
2019. To shift or not to shift.
Sign Language & Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Hübl, Annika & Markus Steinbach
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 1 ff.
Köder, Franziska
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 207 ff.
KÖDER, FRANZISKA & EMAR MAIER
2016. Children mix direct and indirect speech: evidence from pronoun comprehension.
Journal of Child Language 43:4 ► pp. 843 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Steinbach, Markus & Edgar Onea
2016. A DRT Analysis of Discourse Referents and Anaphora Resolution in Sign Language.
Journal of Semantics 33:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
Zeman, Sonja
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 173 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.