Chapter 5
Behavioral evidence for VISMIP
Article outline
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2Method
- 5.2.1Participants
- 5.2.2Material
- 5.2.3Instructions
- 5.2.4Test session
- 5.2.5Data transcription
- 5.2.6Empirical evidence for VISMIP
- 5.3General understanding
- 5.4Units of analysis and finding incongruity
- 5.5Testing the need for comparison and testing non-literal meaning
- 5.6Potential explanation by cross-domain mapping
- 5.7Conclusion
-
References
References (18)
Carlson, L., & Marcu, D.
(
2001)
Discourse tagging reference manual. Retrieved from
[URL].
Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E.
(
2001)
Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In
Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A.
(
1993)
Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haak, M. van den
(
2008)
A penny for your thoughts: Investigating the validity and reliability of think-aloud protocols for usability testing (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kintgen, E. R.
(
1983)
The Perception of Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laszlo, J., Meutsch, D., & Viehoff, R.
(
1988)
Verbal reports as data in text comprehension research: An introduction,
Text: 8(4), 283–294.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longacre, R.
(
1983)
The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A.
(
1988)
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization.
Text, 8, 243–281.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G.
(
1999)
Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses.
Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 37–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, B. J.
(
1997)
Thinking into it: Consumer interpretation of complex advertising images.
Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 77–87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, B. J.
(
2003)
Understanding visual metaphor in advertising. In
L. M. Scott &
R. Batra (Eds.),
Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 297–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Someren, M. W., van Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C.
(
1994)
The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Šorm, E. & Steen, G.
this vol.).
VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor Identification.
Steen, G. J.
(
1991)
The empirical study of literary reading: Methods of data collection.
Poetics, 20(5–6), 559–575.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J.
(
1994)
Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
Verhagen, A.
(
1996)
Tekstsegmentatie, onderschikking en subjectiviteit [Tekst segmentation, subordination and subjectivity].
Gramma/TTT, 5(3), 249–268.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Kowalski, Grzegorz
2022.
Kognitywne modele metafory wizualnej: teoria, metodologia, analizy.
LingVaria 17:1(33)
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ventalon, Geoffrey, Grozdana Erjavec & Charles Tijus
2020.
Processing visual metaphors in advertising: an exploratory study of cognitive abilities.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology 32:8
► pp. 816 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.