Cover not available
Part of
Visual Metaphor: Structure and process
Edited by Gerard J. Steen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 18] 2018
► pp. 185–196

Chapter 8
Conclusion

Article outline
  • 8.1Discussion of the research presented in this book
  • 8.2Further research
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.08ste
References (19)
References
Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112(1), 193–215.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.) (2008). Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodiamont, D., Hoeken, H., Van Mulken, M. (This vol.). Conventionality in visual metaphor.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago [etc.], University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Pilosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilperoord, J. (This vol.). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor.
Šorm, E. and Steen, G. J. (2013). Processing visual metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 3(1), 1–34.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ṧorm, E., and Steen, G. J. (This vol.). VisMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 26–64.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Core tenets, Remaining Issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). MIPVU: A method for linguistic metaphor identification in natural discourse. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Heerik, R., Šorm, E., and Steen, G. J. (This vol.) Behavioral evidence for VisMIP.
Van Weelden, L., Maes, A. A., and Schilperoord, J. (This vol.). How visual form affects metaphorical conceptualization: The role of shape similarity.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Zurru, Elisabetta
2021. Chapter 11. “Your planet needs you”. In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37], DOI logo
Zurru, Elisabetta
2021. Chapter 11. “Your planet needs you”. In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37], ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.