Chapter published in:
Visual Metaphor: Structure and process
Edited by Gerard J. Steen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 18] 2018
► pp. 185196


Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112(1), 193–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(Ed.) (2008) Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodiamont, D., Hoeken, H., Van Mulken, M.
This vol.). Conventionality in visual metaphor.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago [etc.], University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1999) Pilosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilperoord, J.
This vol.). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor.
Šorm, E. and Steen, G. J.
(2013) Processing visual metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 3(1), 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ṧorm, E., and Steen, G. J.
This vol.). VisMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification.
Steen, G.
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 26–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics. Crossref.Google Scholar
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Core tenets, Remaining Issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) MIPVU: A method for linguistic metaphor identification in natural discourse. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Heerik, R., Šorm, E., and Steen, G. J.
This vol.) Behavioral evidence for VisMIP.
Van Weelden, L., Maes, A. A., and Schilperoord, J.
This vol.). How visual form affects metaphorical conceptualization: The role of shape similarity.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Zurru, Elisabetta
2021.  In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37], Crossref logo
Zurru, Elisabetta
2021.  In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37],  pp. 210 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.