Chapter published in:
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 116


Akpinar, E. & Berger, J.
(2015) Drivers of cultural success: The case of sensory metaphors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 20–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, R.
(2004) Musical pitch space across modalities: Spatial and other mappings through language and culture. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (Vol. 72). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptual Perceptual symbol systems. Brain and Behavioral Science, 22(4), 577-609.Google Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P.
(1964) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L.
(2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croijmans, I. & Majid, A.
(2016) Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE 5(5): e0155845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
(2011) The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A.
(2012) The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012) (pp. 300–305). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D.
(2013) The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engen, T.
(1987) Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist, 497–503.Google Scholar
Evans, N. & Wilkins, D.
(2000) In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, K. L.
(2002) Culture and the senses: Bodily ways of knowing in an African community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, M., Gal, O., Polak, M., & Cholow, Y.
(2015) The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors: The case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46, 167–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A. & Schneider, W.
(2006a) Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W.
(2006b) Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 214–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(1999) Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Idström, A. & Piirainen, E.
(2012) Endangered metaphors. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R.
(2009) The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., Chatterjee, A.
(2016) Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(4): 1080–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C.
(1999) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see . In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995 (pp.155–170).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W. R., & Cook, R.
(2009) The world color survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
(Ed.) (2015) The linguistics of temperature. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E.
(2011) The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K.
(2012) Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and language, 120(3), 416–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, O.
(2011) Materiality vs. expressivity: The use of sensory vocabulary in Yucatec Maya. Senses & Society 6(1), pp. 117–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N.
(2012) Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2000) Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10(1), 3–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., Majid, A., & Enfield, N. J.
(2007) Language of perception: The view from language and culture. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field Manual Volume 10 (pp. 10–21). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
(2009) Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 516–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A.
(2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1), 59–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A.
(2013) Making semantics and pragmatics “sensory”. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 48–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N.
(2014) Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. & Levinson, S. C.
(2011) The senses in language and culture. Senses & Society, 6(1), 5–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Oztürk, O., Brown, P., Hill, C., Le Guen, O., Hirtzel, V., van Gijn, R., Sicoli, M. A., & Levinson, S. C.
in press). The differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Matissof, J. A.
(1978) Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘organic’ approach to linguistic comparison. Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics, Volume VI. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues (ISHI).Google Scholar
Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F.
(2012) A rol for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7): 1634-1647.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, H.
2012The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3), 395–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, J. K., & Gottfried, J. A.
(2015) The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 314–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, C. & Majid, A.
submitted). Anger stinks in Seri: Olfactory metaphor in a lesser-described language.
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A.
(Eds.) (2005) The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., Van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
(2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E. & Majid, A.
(2018) Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371-406. Crossref.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M., Denke, C., Heinze, H. J., & Rotte, M.
(2013) Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1653–1659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Snoek, G. L., Drew, A. R., Barile, E. C., & Agauas, S. J.
(2015) Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwager, W., & Zeshan, U.
(2008) Word classes in sign languages: Criteria and classifications. Studies in Language, 32(3), 509–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O., & Sicoli, M. A.
(2011) The Thickness of pitch: Crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. Senses & Society, 6(1), 96–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A.
(2018) An exception to mental simulation: No evidence for embodied odor language. Cognitive Science, 42(4), 1146-1178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2204–2218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. M.
(1981) Toward a Kpelle conceptualization of music performance. The Journal of American Folklore, 94(372), 188–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Surrallés, A.
(2016) On contrastive perception and ineffability: assessing sensory experience without colour terms in an Amazonian society. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(4), 962–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. L.
(1975) Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 15(3), 207–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1), 123–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F.
(2013) The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkowski, B. M., Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, M. S., & Feltman, R.
(2009) “Hot-headed” is more than an expression: The embodied representation of anger in terms of heat. Emotion, 9(4), 464–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M.
(1976) Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52(2). 461–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(1995) Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(2), 59–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zbikowski, L.
(1998) Metaphor and music theory: Reflections from cognitive science. Music Theory Online, 4(1),1–11.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

BAŞ, Melike
2021. tat- Eyleminin Anlam Genişlemesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Akademik Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 5:2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
2021.  Bodo Winter, Sensory Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. Pp. 289. ISBN: 978-9-0272-0310-6.. Language and Cognition 13:2  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Speed, Laura J. & Asifa Majid
2020. Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsychology 37:5-6  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.