Cover not available
Part of
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 105–126

Chapter 6
Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical

Speakers often use metaphor when talking about the contents of perception. For example, a word such as sweet can be used to talk metaphorically about sensory impressions that are not directly related to taste, as in so-called “synaesthetic metaphors” such as sweet fragrance and sweet melody. In this chapter, I present arguments against the synaesthetic and metaphorical nature of such expressions. First, a look at the neuropsychological literature reveals that the phenomenon commonly called “synaesthesia” bears little resemblance to the metaphors investigated by linguists. Moreover, in contrast to synaesthesia as a neuropsychological phenomenon, most “synaesthetic” metaphors involve mappings between highly similar and perceptually integrated sensory modalities, such as taste and smell. Finally, combinations of words that involve dissimilar sensory modalities, such as sweet melody, appear to perform largely evaluative functions. Thus, evaluation might be driving the use of these terms, more so than “synaesthetic” perception. I will then compare my analyses to the idea that many metaphors are grounded in primary metaphors and/or metonymies. All in all, this paper suggests that many and perhaps most “synaesthetic metaphors” are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. From a broader perspective, the case study of synaesthetic metaphors presented here fleshes out the way language and perception are related and how sensory content is encoded in the lexicon of human languages.

Keywords: synaesthesia, the senses, perceptual metaphors, primary metaphor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on synaesthetic metaphors
  • 3.Beware of synaesthesia
  • 4.Beyond synaesthesia
  • 5.Alternative analyses: Primary metaphors and metonymy
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.06win
References
Auvray, M., & Spence, C.
(2008) The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1016–1031.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagli, M.
(2016) “Shaking off so good a wife and so sweet a lady”: Shakespeare’s use of taste words. Journal of Literary Semantics, 45(2), 141–159.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2003) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metonymy is not just a lexical phenomenon: On the operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse. In C. Alm-Arvius, N., Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival (pp. 3–42). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, B., & Stevens, S. S.
(1969) Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(6), 337–339.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, C. D.
(1949) A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages: A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, N. R.
(2010) Physiology of Behavior (10th Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Casati, R., Dokic, J., & Le Corre, F.
(2015) Distinguishing the commonsense senses. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 462–479). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cytowic, R. E.
(1993) The man who tasted shapes. New York: Putnam Press.Google Scholar
Day, S.
(1996) Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32), 1–16.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990- present. Available online at [URL]
(2008) The corpus of contemporary American English. BYE, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
de Araujo, I. E., Rolls, E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., McGlone, F., & Phillips, N.
(2003) Taste olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18(7), 2059–2068.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dantzig, S., Cowell, R. A., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D.
(2011) A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 145-154.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., & Randell, T.
(2004) Robust affective priming effects in a conditional pronunciation task: evidence for the semantic representation of evaluative information. Cognition & Emotion, 18(2), 251–264.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delwiche, J. F., & Heffelfinger, A. L.
(2005) Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. Journal of Sensory Studies, 20(6), 512–525.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deroy, O., & Spence, C.
(2013) Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 643–664.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erzsébet, P. D.
(1974) Synaesthesia and poetry. Poetics, 3(3), 23–44.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A.
(1987) Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(4), 239–250.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galton, F.
(1880a) Visualised numerals. Nature, 21(533), 252–256.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1880b) Visualised numerals. Nature, 22, 494–495.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, J.
(2002) The anthropology of the senses and sensations. La Ricerca Folklorica, 45, 17–28.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C.
(2006) Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32(2), 906–912.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C.
(2002) Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146(2), 161–171.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holz, P.
(2007) Cognition, olfaction and linguistic creativity: Linguistic synesthesia as a poetic device in cologne advertising. In Plümacher, M., & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of colors and odors (pp. 185–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D.
(1991) (Ed.). The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2011) Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
(1998) Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch. Current Biology, 8(6), R190–R191.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julius, D., & Basbaum, A. I.
(2001) Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature, 413(6852), 203–210.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2013) The metaphor–metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lederman, S. J.
(1979) Auditory texture perception. Perception, 8(1), 93–103.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A.
(1978) Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua, 45(2), 95–123.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Wine & Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levänen, S., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
(1998) Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult. Current Biology, 8(15), 869–872.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L.
(2011) A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
(2009) Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A.
(2012) Current emotion research in the language sciences. Emotion Review, 4(4), 432–443.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E.
(1978) The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. New York: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E.
(2001) Synesthesia: Strong and weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 61–65.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBurney, D. H.
(1986) Taste, smell, and flavor terminology: Taking the confusion out of the fusion. In H. L. Meiselman, & R. S. Rivkin (Eds.), Clinical Measurement of Taste and Smell (pp. 117–125). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Møller, A.
(2012) Sensory Systems: Anatomy and Physiology (2nd Edition). Richardson: A. R. Møller Publishing.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
(2013) Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2003) Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14(2), 119–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pink, S.
(2011) Multimodality, multisensoriality and ethnographic knowing: social semiotics and the phenomenology of perception. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 261–276.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prandi, M.
(2012) A plea for living metaphors: Conflictual metaphors and metaphorical swarms. Metaphor & Symbol, 27(2), 148–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakova, M.
(2003) The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and Theories of Concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synaesthesia – a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Rolls, E.
(2008) Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95(2), 131–164.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C. E., Lindsley, R. W., Specht, C., Marcovici, A., Smiley, J. F., & Javitt, D. C.
(2001) Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(3), 1322–1327.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schürmann, M., Caetano, G., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
(2004) Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115 (2), 830–832.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S.
(2000) Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408(6814), 788–788.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y.
(1997) Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Aisenman, R.
(2008) Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter: Synaesthetic metaphors and cognition. Language and Literature, 17(2), 107–121.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gadir, O.
(2009) How to interpret the music of caressing: Target and source assignment in synaesthetic genitive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gil, D.
(2007) Sweet fragrances from Indonesia: A universal principle governing directionality in synaesthetic Metaphors. In W. van Peer, & J. Auracher (Eds.), New Beginnings in Literary Studies (pp. 49–71). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Shibuya, Y., Nozawa, H., & Kanamaru, T.
(2007) Understanding synesthetic expressions: Vision and olfaction with the physiological = psychological model. In M. Plümacher, & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of colors and odors (pp. 203–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simner, J.
(2012) Defining synaesthesia. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 1–15.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J.
(2006) Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35(8), 1024–1033.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R.
(1971) Aristotle on demarcating the five senses. The Philosophical Review, 80(1), 55–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C.
(2011) Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C., & Bayne, T.
(2015) Is consciousness multisensory? In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Smith, B., & Auvray, M.
(2015) Confusing tastes and flavours. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 247–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spivey, M.
(2007) The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F.
(2015) Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. In R. Caballero, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Functions of Language, Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition (pp. 69–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016) Synaesthetic metaphors in translation. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 54(1), 43–70.Google Scholar
(2017) Figures and the senses. Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 83–101 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K., & Jiang, W.
(2013) When my eyes are on you, do you touch my eyes? A reclassification of metaphors mapping from physical contact to perception. In T. Fuyin Li (Eds.), Compendium of Cognitive Linguistics Research Volume 2 (pp. 189–200). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Gyoba, J., & Sakamoto, S.
(2008) Selective effects of auditory stimuli on tactile roughness perception. Brain Research, 1242, 87-94.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(1995) Linguistic Categorization (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S.
(1945) Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 60, 811–827.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1959) The Principles of Semantics (2nd Edition). Glasgow: Jackson, Son & Co.Google Scholar
Wilce, J. M.
(2009) Language and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(1976) Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52, 461–478.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T.
(2015) Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex, 64, 209–224.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B.
(2014) Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 29(3), 151–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b) The sensory structure of the English lexicon. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of California Merced.Google Scholar
Yu, N.
(2003) Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19-34.Google Scholar