Chapter published in:Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 105–126
Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical
Speakers often use metaphor when talking about the contents of perception. For example, a word such as sweet can be used to talk metaphorically about sensory impressions that are not directly related to taste, as in so-called “synaesthetic metaphors” such as sweet fragrance and sweet melody. In this chapter, I present arguments against the synaesthetic and metaphorical nature of such expressions. First, a look at the neuropsychological literature reveals that the phenomenon commonly called “synaesthesia” bears little resemblance to the metaphors investigated by linguists. Moreover, in contrast to synaesthesia as a neuropsychological phenomenon, most “synaesthetic” metaphors involve mappings between highly similar and perceptually integrated sensory modalities, such as taste and smell. Finally, combinations of words that involve dissimilar sensory modalities, such as sweet melody, appear to perform largely evaluative functions. Thus, evaluation might be driving the use of these terms, more so than “synaesthetic” perception. I will then compare my analyses to the idea that many metaphors are grounded in primary metaphors and/or metonymies. All in all, this paper suggests that many and perhaps most “synaesthetic metaphors” are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. From a broader perspective, the case study of synaesthetic metaphors presented here fleshes out the way language and perception are related and how sensory content is encoded in the lexicon of human languages.
Keywords: synaesthesia, the senses, perceptual metaphors, primary metaphor
Published online: 21 February 2019
Auvray, M., & Spence, C.
Bond, B., & Stevens, S. S.
Buck, C. D.
Casati, R., Dokic, J., & Le Corre, F.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990- present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
de Araujo, I. E., Rolls, E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., McGlone, F., & Phillips, N.
van Dantzig, S., Cowell, R. A., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D.
De Houwer, J., & Randell, T.
Delwiche, J. F., & Heffelfinger, A. L.
Deroy, O., & Spence, C.
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A.
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C.
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C.
Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
Julius, D., & Basbaum, A. I.
Levänen, S., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L.
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
Marks, L. E.
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E.
McBurney, D. H.
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
Schroeder, C. E., Lindsley, R. W., Specht, C., Marcovici, A., Smiley, J. F., & Javitt, D. C.
Schürmann, M., Caetano, G., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R.
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S.
Shen, Y., & Aisenman, R.
Shen, Y., & Gadir, O.
Shen, Y., & Gil, D.
Shibuya, Y., Nozawa, H., & Kanamaru, T.
Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J.
Spence, C., & Bayne, T.
Spence, C., Smith, B., & Auvray, M.
Strik Lievers, F.
Sullivan, K., & Jiang, W.
Suzuki, Y., Gyoba, J., & Sakamoto, S.
Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T.
Cited by 10 other publications
No author info given
No author info given
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
HARTMAN, JENNY & CARITA PARADIS
Nuckolls, Janis B.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.