Cover not available
Part of
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 105–126

Chapter 6
Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical

Speakers often use metaphor when talking about the contents of perception. For example, a word such as sweet can be used to talk metaphorically about sensory impressions that are not directly related to taste, as in so-called “synaesthetic metaphors” such as sweet fragrance and sweet melody. In this chapter, I present arguments against the synaesthetic and metaphorical nature of such expressions. First, a look at the neuropsychological literature reveals that the phenomenon commonly called “synaesthesia” bears little resemblance to the metaphors investigated by linguists. Moreover, in contrast to synaesthesia as a neuropsychological phenomenon, most “synaesthetic” metaphors involve mappings between highly similar and perceptually integrated sensory modalities, such as taste and smell. Finally, combinations of words that involve dissimilar sensory modalities, such as sweet melody, appear to perform largely evaluative functions. Thus, evaluation might be driving the use of these terms, more so than “synaesthetic” perception. I will then compare my analyses to the idea that many metaphors are grounded in primary metaphors and/or metonymies. All in all, this paper suggests that many and perhaps most “synaesthetic metaphors” are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. From a broader perspective, the case study of synaesthetic metaphors presented here fleshes out the way language and perception are related and how sensory content is encoded in the lexicon of human languages.
Keywords: synaesthesia, the senses, perceptual metaphors, primary metaphor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on synaesthetic metaphors
  • 3.Beware of synaesthesia
  • 4.Beyond synaesthesia
  • 5.Alternative analyses: Primary metaphors and metonymy
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.06win
References (87)
References
Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1016–1031.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagli, M. (2016). “Shaking off so good a wife and so sweet a lady”: Shakespeare’s use of taste words. Journal of Literary Semantics, 45(2), 141–159.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2003). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metonymy is not just a lexical phenomenon: On the operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse. In C. Alm-Arvius, N., Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival (pp. 3–42). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, B., & Stevens, S. S. (1969). Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(6), 337–339.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1949). A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages: A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, N. R. (2010). Physiology of Behavior (10th Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Casati, R., Dokic, J., & Le Corre, F. (2015). Distinguishing the commonsense senses. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 462–479). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cytowic, R. E. (1993). The man who tasted shapes. New York: Putnam Press.Google Scholar
Day, S. (1996). Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32), 1–16.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990- present. Available online at [URL]
(2008). The corpus of contemporary American English. BYE, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
de Araujo, I. E., Rolls, E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., McGlone, F., & Phillips, N. (2003). Taste olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18(7), 2059–2068.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dantzig, S., Cowell, R. A., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2011). A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 145-154.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., & Randell, T. (2004). Robust affective priming effects in a conditional pronunciation task: evidence for the semantic representation of evaluative information. Cognition & Emotion, 18(2), 251–264.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delwiche, J. F., & Heffelfinger, A. L. (2005). Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. Journal of Sensory Studies, 20(6), 512–525.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deroy, O., & Spence, C. (2013). Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 643–664.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erzsébet, P. D. (1974). Synaesthesia and poetry. Poetics, 3(3), 23–44.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(4), 239–250.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1880a). Visualised numerals. Nature, 21(533), 252–256.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1880b). Visualised numerals. Nature, 22, 494–495.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. (2002). The anthropology of the senses and sensations. La Ricerca Folklorica, 45, 17–28.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32(2), 906–912.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C. (2002). Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146(2), 161–171.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holz, P. (2007). Cognition, olfaction and linguistic creativity: Linguistic synesthesia as a poetic device in cologne advertising. In Plümacher, M., & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of colors and odors (pp. 185–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. (1991) (Ed.). The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (1998). Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch. Current Biology, 8(6), R190–R191.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julius, D., & Basbaum, A. I. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature, 413(6852), 203–210.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2013). The metaphor–metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lederman, S. J. (1979). Auditory texture perception. Perception, 8(1), 93–103.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A. (1978). Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua, 45(2), 95–123.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Wine & Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levänen, S., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (1998). Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult. Current Biology, 8(15), 869–872.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. (2012). Current emotion research in the language sciences. Emotion Review, 4(4), 432–443.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1978). The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. New York: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (2001). Synesthesia: Strong and weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 61–65.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBurney, D. H. (1986). Taste, smell, and flavor terminology: Taking the confusion out of the fusion. In H. L. Meiselman, & R. S. Rivkin (Eds.), Clinical Measurement of Taste and Smell (pp. 117–125). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Møller, A. (2012). Sensory Systems: Anatomy and Physiology (2nd Edition). Richardson: A. R. Møller Publishing.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2013). Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14(2), 119–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pink, S. (2011). Multimodality, multisensoriality and ethnographic knowing: social semiotics and the phenomenology of perception. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 261–276.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prandi, M. (2012). A plea for living metaphors: Conflictual metaphors and metaphorical swarms. Metaphor & Symbol, 27(2), 148–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakova, M. (2003). The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and Theories of Concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia – a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Rolls, E. (2008). Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95(2), 131–164.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C. E., Lindsley, R. W., Specht, C., Marcovici, A., Smiley, J. F., & Javitt, D. C. (2001). Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(3), 1322–1327.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schürmann, M., Caetano, G., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (2004). Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115 (2), 830–832.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408(6814), 788–788.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. (1997). Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Aisenman, R. (2008). Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter: Synaesthetic metaphors and cognition. Language and Literature, 17(2), 107–121.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gadir, O. (2009). How to interpret the music of caressing: Target and source assignment in synaesthetic genitive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Gil, D. (2007). Sweet fragrances from Indonesia: A universal principle governing directionality in synaesthetic Metaphors. In W. van Peer, & J. Auracher (Eds.), New Beginnings in Literary Studies (pp. 49–71). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Shibuya, Y., Nozawa, H., & Kanamaru, T. (2007). Understanding synesthetic expressions: Vision and olfaction with the physiological = psychological model. In M. Plümacher, & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of colors and odors (pp. 203–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simner, J. (2012). Defining synaesthesia. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 1–15.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K., & Ward, J. (2006). Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35(8), 1024–1033.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1971). Aristotle on demarcating the five senses. The Philosophical Review, 80(1), 55–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C., & Bayne, T. (2015). Is consciousness multisensory? In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Smith, B., & Auvray, M. (2015). Confusing tastes and flavours. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities (pp. 247–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. (2007). The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F. (2015). Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. In R. Caballero, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Functions of Language, Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition (pp. 69–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016). Synaesthetic metaphors in translation. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 54(1), 43–70.Google Scholar
(2017). Figures and the senses. Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 83–101 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K., & Jiang, W. (2013). When my eyes are on you, do you touch my eyes? A reclassification of metaphors mapping from physical contact to perception. In T. Fuyin Li (Eds.), Compendium of Cognitive Linguistics Research Volume 2 (pp. 189–200). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Gyoba, J., & Sakamoto, S. (2008). Selective effects of auditory stimuli on tactile roughness perception. Brain Research, 1242, 87-94.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1945). Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 60, 811–827.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1959). The Principles of Semantics (2nd Edition). Glasgow: Jackson, Son & Co.Google Scholar
Wilce, J. M. (2009). Language and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52, 461–478.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T. (2015). Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex, 64, 209–224.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. (2014). Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 29(3), 151–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). The sensory structure of the English lexicon. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of California Merced.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19-34.Google Scholar
Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Galac, Ádám
2024. Bold colors, sweeping melodies, offensive smells. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Sanz-Valdivieso, Lucía & Belén López Arroyo
2024. Figurative Language and Sensory Perception: Corpus-Based Computer-Assisted Study of the Nature and Motivation of Synesthetic Metaphors in Olive Oil Tasting Notes. Metaphor and Symbol 39:4 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Spence, Charles & Nicola Di Stefano
2024. Sensory translation between audition and vision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 31:2 ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Tóth, Máté
2024. A case for metonymic synesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing, Yunfei Long, Xiaotong Jiang, Zhongqing Wang, Chu-Ren Huang & Guodong Zhou
2024. Linguistic synesthesia detection: Leveraging culturally enriched linguistic features. Natural Language Processing ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhong, Yin, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
2024. Novel metaphor and embodiment: comprehending novel synesthetic metaphors. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Galac, Ádám & Daler Zayniev
2023. Paths of linguistic synesthesia across cultures. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo
Keränen, Jarkko
2023. Cross-modal iconicity and indexicality in the production of lexical sensory and emotional signs in Finnish Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Francesca Strik-Lievers
2023. Semantic distance predicts metaphoricity and creativity judgments in synesthetic metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Damian, Mihaela Marieta
2022. The Metaphor of Light – Perspectives on Conceptual Metaphors. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 14:3 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Di Stefano, Nicola, Maddalena Murari & Charles Spence
2022. Crossmodal Correspondences in Art and Science: Odours, Poetry, and Music. In Olfaction: An Interdisciplinary Perspective from Philosophy to Life Sciences [Human Perspectives in Health Sciences and Technology, 4], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Fishman, Alon
2022. The picture looks like my music sounds: directional preferences in synesthetic metaphors in the absence of lexical factors. Language and Cognition 14:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity . Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
Rakhilina, Ekaterina, Daria Ryzhova & Yulia Badryzlova
2022. Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
2022. Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: a lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Coschignano, Serena
2021. The semantic network of temperature. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
HARTMAN, JENNY & CARITA PARADIS
2021. Figurative meaning in multimodal work by an autistic artist: a cognitive semantic approach. Language and Cognition 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
2023. The language of sound: events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
NAKIBOĞLU, Gülsün
2021. “[B]en gözlerimle dinlerken”: Tevfik Fikret’in şiirlerinde edebî sinestezi ve bir edebî sinestet olarak Tevfik Fikret. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :25 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020. Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication 71 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2024. Metaphor as a resemblance phenomenon. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing
2020. From Linguistic Synaesthesia to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing
2020. Introduction to Synaesthesia. In Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nuckolls, Janis B.
2019. Chapter 7. The sensori-semantic clustering of ideophonic meaning in Pastaza Quichua. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Zawisławska, Magdalena
2019. Narrative metaphors in Polish perfumery discourse. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Chapter 18. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.