Cover not available
Part of
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 185–208

Chapter 10
Approaching perceptual qualities

The case of heavy

The paper examines the properties of heavy as a perceptual concept, based on evidence from 11 languages. We demonstrate that the semantics of this concept is heterogeneous; lexemes of this field can be used in situations of at least three types: Lifting, Shifting and Weighing. These situations are either lexicalised as separate words, or they converge in a single lexeme in various combinations following certain strategies. We also argue that different metaphorical extensions correspond to different situation types; this allows us to use analysis of metaphoric shifts as an additional instrument to establish the semantic structure of direct meanings.
Keywords: lexical typology, frame approach, qualities, heavy, metaphor, perception
Article outline
  • 1.Perceptual lexicon: The different facets
  • 2.The case of heavy
  • 3.Typological perspective: Principles of colexification
    • 3.1Strategy 1: Differential lexical marking
    • 3.2Strategy 2: Lifting and Shifting vs. Weighing
    • 3.3Strategy 3: Lifting and Weighing vs. Shifting
  • 4.Metaphorical extensions
    • 4.1Perceptual metaphor
    • 4.2“Canonical” metaphors
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.10ryz
References (34)
References
Apresjan, J. D. (2000). Systematic lexicography. Translated from Russian by K. Windle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic colour terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2011). Colour me bitter: Crossmodal compounding in Tzeltal perception words. The Senses & Society, 6(1), 106–116.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76, 546–592.Google Scholar
François, A. (2008). Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In: Vanhove, M. (ed.) From Polysemy to Semantic change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Studies in Language Companion Series, 106, 163–216.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2007). NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 31 (4) 765–800.Google Scholar
(2013). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. OUP Oxford.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In: Tomasello, M., (ed.). The new psychology of language, vol.2. Mahwah, NJ, 211–242.Google Scholar
Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W. R., & Cook, R. (2009). World Colour Survey. Stanford: CSLI ([URL])
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (Ed.). (2015). The linguistics of temperature (Vol. 107). John Benjamins Publishing Company.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Rakhilina, E., and Vanhove, M. (2016). The semantics of lexical typology. In: Riemer, Nick (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, 434–454.Google Scholar
Kruglyakova, V. A. (2010). Semantika glagolov vraščenija v tipologičeskoj perspektive [Semantics of rotation verbs in a typological perspective]. Ph.D. thesis, Russian State University for Humanities.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195–208.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yu., Maisak, T., & Rakhilina, E. (2012). Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems, in: Motion Encoding in Language and Space, 67–83.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1439–1459.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. (2015). Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In The Oxford handbook of the word, 364–379. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Staden, M. V., & Boster, J. S. (2007). The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A cross-linguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 133–152.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. In Cognition 130(2), 266–270.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The senses in language and culture. The Senses & Society, 6(1), 5–18.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Senft, G., & Levinson, S. C. (2007). The language of olfaction. Field Manual Volume, 10, 36–41.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Panina, A. 2007. Vyraženie peremeščenija i naxoždenija v vode v japonskom jazyke. [The expression of motion and being in water in Japanese.] // T. Maisak, E. Rakhilina (eds.). Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija. [Aqua-motion verbs: a study in lexical typology.] Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. (2010). Verbs of rotation in Russian and Рolish // V. Hasko, R. Perelmutter (eds.). New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, 115. 291–314.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, E., & Reznikova, T. (2016). 4. A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, 58, 95–130.Google Scholar
(Eds.) The Typology of Physical Qualities. Benjamins, to appear.
Reznikova, T., Rakhilina, E., & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. (2012). Towards a typology of pain predicates. In: Linguistics, 50(3), 421–465.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, G., Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2007). The language of taste. Field Manual, 1, 42–5.Google Scholar
Shemanaeva, O. 2007. Vyraženie peremeščenija v vode v nemeckom jazyke. [The expression of aqua-motion in German.] // T. Maisak, E. Rakhilina (eds.). Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija. [Aqua-motion verbs: a study in lexical typology.] Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1991). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Vol. 54. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhove, M. (2008). Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations (pp. 341–370). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1984). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth, B Comrie & Ö. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, 123–162.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, P., & Regina Parameswaran, C. (2018). Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolise the felt heaviness of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52, 461–479.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Ryzhova, Daria, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova & Yulia Badryzlova
2024. Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2023. Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Galac, Ádám & Daler Zayniev
2023. Paths of linguistic synesthesia across cultures. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Jan-Peter & Mark Mynett
2022. What is “Heavy” in Metal? A Netnographic Analysis of Online Forums for Metal Musicians and Producers. Popular Music and Society 45:5 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Kholkina, Liliya
2022. Chapter 9. Lexical typology of Mandarin Chinese qualitative features. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Tatiana Reznikova
2022. Chapter 1. Introduction. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rakhilina, Ekaterina, Daria Ryzhova & Yulia Badryzlova
2022. Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.