Anishchanka, A., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D.
Aristotle
(1976) De anima (Hicks, Robert, Trans.). New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Barrós-Loscertales, A., González, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., Costumero, V., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C.
(2012) Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2554–2563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona Sánchez, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K.
(2010) Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 115–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, M. E. L., & Pickering, M. J.
(2013) Perspective taking in language: Integrating the spatial and action domains. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(2000) Genres in conflict. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R.
(2011) The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R.
(2016) In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1096–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, M.
(1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Strik-Lievers, F.
(2018) How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bosker, B.
(2015) Is there a better way to talk about wine? The New Yorker. Acessed at [URL]
Brisard, F.
(2002) The English present. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 259–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bushdid, C., Magnasco, M. O., Vosshall, L. B., & Keller, A.
(2014) Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science, 343, 1370–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R.
(2003) Metaphor and genre. The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 145–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Cutting across the senses. Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014) Exploring the combination of language, images and sound in the metaphors of TV commercials. Atlantis, 36(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
(2016) Genre and metaphor. Use and variation across usage events. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 193–205). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Díaz Vera, J.
(Eds) (2013) The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C.
(2013) Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. Díaz Vera (Eds.), The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 77–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. Functions of Language, 22(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Verbs in speech framing expressions: Comparing English and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics, 53(2), 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E.
(2008) Translating the senses. Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N.
(1996) Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charters, S.
(2007) On the evaluation of wine quality. Questions of taste. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), The philosophy of wine (pp. 157–182). Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar
Charles Spence and Qian Janice Wang
(2015) Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound Flavour (2015) 4:33 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds of sense. Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A.
(1994) Aroma. The cultural history of smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, G.
(2001) The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
Croft, W., & Cruse, A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A.
(2016) Language does not explain the wine-specific memory advantage of wine experts. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Cognitive science Society (pp. 141–146). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Cruse, A.
(2002) The construal of sense boundaries. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 12, 101–19.Google Scholar
Danesi, M.
(2006) Brands. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011) What’s in a brand name? A note on the onomastics of brand naming. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 59, 175–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, S.
(1996) Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32). Accessed at [URL]
Dean, D. L., & Forbes, S. L.
(2016) Are customers having e-conversations about your wine? The importance of online discussion forums as electronic word of mouth for wine marketers. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.), Successful social media and ecommerce strategies in the wine industry (pp. 115–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demattè, M. L., Sanabria, D., & Spence, C.
(2006) Cross-modal associations between odors and colours. Chemical Senses, 31(6), 531–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.
(2003) Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 47–87). Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. D. & Newton, N.
Evans, R.
(2016) How to build a hot brand. Meininger Online. Available at [URL]. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Fairclough, N.
(2003) Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. G. Kristensen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. The Public Journal of Semiotics, I(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
(2008) Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie, & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 272–310). Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2009) The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 383–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Concluding observations and further research. Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor, lecture 8/8, in [URL]
(2016) Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television, and video games (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Jeulink, M.
Foucault, M.
(1969) L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freedman, A., & Medway, P.
(Eds.) (1994) Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P.
(2014) The geometry of meaning. Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasnier, V.
(2006) A taste for wine. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar
George Lakoff and Mark Turner
1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(Ed.) (2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gluck, M.
(2003) Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak? In J. Aitchinson, & D. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 107–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2006) Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage, 32, 906–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goode, J.
(2016a) I taste red: The science of tasting wine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2016b) The social licence of wine. Paper presented at the 16th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference (July 2016).
Grady, J.
(1997)  theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, K. M.
(1999) ‘Oiling the wheels of social life’: Myths and marketing in Champagne during the Belle Époque. French Historical Studies, 22(2), 211–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F.
(2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, P.
(2006) Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48, 157–172.Google Scholar
Herdenstam, A.
(2004) Sinnesupplevelsens estetik. Vinprovaren, i gränslandet mellan konsten och vetenskapen. Stockholm: Stockholm dialoger.Google Scholar
Hodge, R.
(1990) Literature as discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C.
(2011) Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C., & Paradis, C.
(2014) Constructing credibility through representations in the discourse of wine: Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In D. Glynn, & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity. Stance strategies in discourse and narration (pp. 187–214). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(2003) Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Cultural synaesthesia: Neurological vs. anthropological approaches to the study of intersensoriality. Intellectica, 55, 156–87.Google Scholar
(2013) Postscript to Sensuous Cognition: The language of the senses. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), 293–298.Google Scholar
Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D.
(2010) Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. NeuroImage, 49, 1116–1123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2007) Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M.
(2009) Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefford, A.
(2015) Jefford on Monday: Tasting notes – the shame of the wine world? Decanter (August 31). Accessed at [URL]
(2016) Jefford on Monday: Letter to a young wine taster. Decanter (May 30). Accessed at [URL]
Johnson, H., & Robinson, J.
(2013) The world atlas of wine. 7th edition. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
Keller, A.
(2016) Philosophy of olfactory perception. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerren, A., Kyusakova, M., & Paradis, C.
(2013) From culture to text to interactive visualization of wine reviews. In F. T. Marchese, & E. Banissi (Eds), Knowledge visualization currents: From text to art to culture (pp. 85–110). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2010) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M.
(2015) True taste: The seven essential wine words. Kennebunkport: Cider Mill Press.Google Scholar
Kremer, L., & Ronneberger-Sibold, E.
(Eds.) (2007) Names in commerce and industry: Past and present. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K.
(2012) Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120(3), 416–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1986) Abstract motion. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12, 455–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langewiesche, W.
(2000) The million-dollar nose. The Atlantic Monthly, 42–70. [URL]. Date of access 2 September, 2016.
Lehrer, A.
(1975) Talking about wine. Language, 51(4), 901–923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1978) Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua, 45, 95–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983) Wine and Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Reprinted and expanded in 2009 by Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29, 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(1998) Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text, 18(2), 143–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L.
(2011) A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
(2009) Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 516–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLean, N.
(2003) When words get in the wine: The search for adjectives. National Post at [URL]. Accessed on 10 November 2011.
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (2011) The senses in language and culture [Special Issue]. The Senses & Society, 6, 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N.
(2014) Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130, 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., de Valk, J., Hansson, B. S.
(2018) Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, 373, 1752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T.
(2004) The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Motivation in grammar (pp. 221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McCarthy, E., & Ewing-Mulligan, M.
(2006) Wine for dummies. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCoy, E.
(2005) The emperor of wine: The rise of Robert M. Parker Jr. and the reign of American taste. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E., & Phillips, B.
(Eds.) (2008) Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Messaris, P.
(1997) Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., & Tresidder, R.
(2016) Contemporary wine studies. Dancing with Bacchus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrot, G., Brochet, F., & Dubourdieu, D.
(2001) The colour of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Negro Alousque, I.
(2015) Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 125–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, A., Arnold, R., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E., Schmidt, J., & Stern, P.
(1987) Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(2), 107–109.Google Scholar
Nossiter, J.
(2004) Mondovino. Goatworks Films & Films de la Croisade.Google Scholar
O’Hara-Plotnik, A.
(2016) Wine label design is more important than you think. Eater (Oct 12). Available at [URL]. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Oberfeld, D., Hecht, H., Allendorf, U., & Wickelmaier, F.
(2009) Ambient lighting modifies the flavor of wine. Journal of Sensory Studies, 24, 797–832. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Old, M.
(2013) Wine: A tasting course. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar
Olofsson, J., Hurley, R. S., Bowman, N. E., Bao, X., Mesulam, M., & Gottfried, J. A.
(2014) A designated odor–language integration system in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(45), 14864–14873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
(1995) Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
(Eds.) (1999) Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(Eds.) (2003) Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C.
(2001) Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004/2011) Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. Reprinted in P. Hanks & R. Giora (Eds.), Metaphor and figurative language: Critical concepts in linguistics, (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2005) Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes, 15, 541–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) This beauty should drink well for 10–12 years: A note on recommendations as semantic middles. Text & Talk, 29(1), 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Prime time: The middle construction in wine drinking recommendations. In R. Bowen, M. Mobärg, & S. Ohlander (Eds.), Corpus and discourse – and stuff (pp. 243–251). Gothenburg Studies in English 96. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
(2010) Touchdowns in winespeak: ontologies and contruals in use and meaning-making. In M. Goded Rambaud & A. Poves Luelmo. (Eds.), Proceedings for the 1st congress on linguistic approaches to food and wine descriptions (p. 57–72). Madrid: UNED University Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Meanings of words. Theory and application. In U. Hass, & P. Storjohann (Eds.), Handbuch wort und wortschatz (Handbücher Sprachwissen-HSW Band 3) (pp. 274–294). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Willners, C.
(2011) Antonymy: From conventionalization to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 367–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
(2013) Describing sensory perceptions: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Hommerberg, C.
(2016) We drink with our eyes first. The web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 177–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. M.
(2008) Parker’s Wine Buyer’s Guide. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Peynaud, E.
(1987) The taste of wine. London: Macdonald Orbis.Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B., & McQuarrie, E.
(2004) Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1/2), 111–34.Google Scholar
Plümacher, M., & Holz, P.
(Eds.) (2007) Speaking of colours and odors. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popova, Y.
(2003) ‘The fool sees with his nose’: Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume. Language and Literature, 12, 135–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1–26). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.
(1996) Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prial, F. J.
(1988) Wine talk. New York Times. (May 4). Accessed at [URL]
Pulvermüller, F.
(2003) The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E.
(2001) Synaesthesia –A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T.
(2007) Embodiment and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rolls, E.
(2008) Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95, 131–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A.
(Eds.) (2002) Olfaction, taste and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, F. J.
2000 “The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy”, in Barcelona, A. (ed). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–132.Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
(2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1), 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, L. M., & Batra, R.
(Eds.) (2003) Persuasive imagery. A consumer perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y.
(1997) Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. & Gadir, O.
(2009) Target and source assignment in synaesthetic possessive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, G. M.
(2015) Neuroenology: How the brain creates the taste of wine. Flavour, 4(19). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
(2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 621–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 481–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sjöblom, P.
(2016) Commercial names. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 453–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, P., Ainiala, T., & Hakala, U.
(2013) Names in the economy: Cultural prospects. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Velasco, C., & Knoeferle, K.
(2014) A large sample study on the influence of the multisensory environment on the wine drinking experience. Flavour, 3(8). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C., & Wang, Q.
(2015a) Wine and music (I): On the crossmodal matching of wine and music. Flavour, 4(34). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Wine and music (II): Can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound. Flavour, 4(33). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015c) Wine and music (III): So what if music influences the taste of the wine? Flavour, 4(36). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C. et al.
(2015) On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal. Flavour volume 4, Article number 23 (2015) doi:  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F.
(2015) Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of Language, 22(1), 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & Winter, B.
(2018) Sensory languages across lexical categories. Lingua, 204, 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Toste, E.
(2007) Metaphor inside the wine cellar. On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak. Metaphorik.de, 12, 53–64.Google Scholar
(2013) One man’s cheese is another man’s music: Synaesthesia and the bridging of cultural differences in the language of sensory perception. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 169–191). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1996) Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I, Conceptual Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, R., & Dubois, D.
(Eds.) (2017) Food and terminology. Expressing sensory experience in several languages. Special issue of Terminology, 23(1).Google Scholar
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S.
(2002) Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: a design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tent, J.
(2017) Out-of-the-blue names of paint colours. Names, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P.
(2004) Agency and consciousness in discourse. Self-other dynamics as a complex system. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2005) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trosborg, A.
(2000) Analysing professional genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, S.
(1945) Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. PMLA, 60(3), 811–827. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.
(2008) Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M., & Fuertes-Olivera, P.
(2006a) Towards a critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1982–2002. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M. & Fuertes-Olivera, P.
(2006b) Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfumes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 217–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Verbs of perception. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 1294–1309). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Warren, B.
(2006) Referential metonymy. Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis. Kungliga Humanistiska vetenskapssamfundet i Lund.Google Scholar
Willander, J., & Larsson, M.
(2006) Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 240–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B.
(2016a) The sensory structure of the English lexicon. PhD dissertation University of California, Merced. [URL]
(2016b) Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A.
(2018) Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 179, 213–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1977) Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whittock, T.
(1990) Metaphor and film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wochele, H., Kuhn, J., & Stegu, M.
(Eds.) (2012) Onomastics goes business: Role and relevance of brand, company and other names in economic contexts. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N.
(2010) An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 219–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(2003) Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubek, J., Denkiewicz, M., Dębska, A., Radkowska, A., Komorowska-Mach, J., Litwin, P., Stępień, M., Kucińska, A., Sitarska, E., Komorowska, K., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., & Rączaszek, L.
(2016) Performance of language-coordinated collective systems: A study of wine recognition and description. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zucco, G. M.
2007The unique nature of a memory system. In Plümacher, M. & Holz, P. (eds.). Speaking of colours and odors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 155–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.
(2009) Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar