Chapter published in:
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 137158
Braunmüller, K.
(2002) Semicommunication and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canty, A., & Ripley, B.
(2015) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3–17.Google Scholar
Delsing, L.-O., & Åkesson, K. L.
(2005) Håller språket ihop Norden?: En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska. TemaNord, http://​norden​.diva​-portal​.org​/smash​/get​/diva2:700762​/FULLTEXT01​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dorst, A. G.
(2011) Metaphor in fiction: Language, thought and communication. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. http://​dare​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/handle​/1871​/19629Google Scholar
Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P.
(2012) irr: Various Coefficients of Inter-rater Reliability and Agreement, R package version 0.84. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=irr
Hanks, P.
(2013) Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E.
(1966) Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36 (2), 280–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaal, A. A.
(2012) Metaphor in conversation. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. http://​dare​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/handle​/1871​/32987Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T.
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. http://​dare​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/handle​/1871​/19774Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L.
(2012) Inter-rater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22(3), 276–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nacey, S.
(2013) Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S.
(1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.o http://​www​.R​-project​.org/Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torp, A.
(1998) Nordiske Språk i Nordisk og Germansk Perspektiv. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
(2004) Nordiska språk i forntid och nutid: Språklikhet och språkskillnad, språkfamiljer och språksläktskap. In I. S. Sletten (Ed.), Nordens Språk med Rötter och Fötter (pp.19–74). Århus: Akaprint.Google Scholar
Universitet i Bergen & Språkrådet
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Creed, Allison & Susan Nacey
2021. Metaphor analysis in vocational counselling: moving from intuitive to reliable metaphor identification. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 49:3  pp. 321 ff. Crossref logo
Nacey, Susan
2022. Systematic Metaphors in Norwegian Doctoral Dissertation Acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nacey, Susan & Siri Fürst Skogmo
2021. Learner translation of metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 11:2  pp. 212 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.