Cover not available
Part of
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 227–245

Chapter 11
Linguistic metaphor identification in Uzbek

| , , TurkeyIstanbul Aydın University , Turkey
Article outline
  • 11.1Introduction
  • 11.2Operational issues
    • 11.2.1Data collection
    • 11.2.2Dictionary use
  • 11.3Linguistic issues
    • 11.3.1Locative, dative and ablative cases
      • Locative markers
      • Dative markers
      • Ablative markers
    • 11.3.2Compound verbs
  • 11.4Sample analyses
  • 11.5Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.11kay
References (10)
References
Bodrogligeti, A. J. E. (2003). An academic reference grammar of modern literary Uzbek, Vol. 1–2. Los Angeles, CA: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Clauson, G. (1972). An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coşkun, V. (2000). Özbek Türkçesi grameri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
Eckmann, J. (1966). Chagatay manual. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Gen, S. (2015). Özbekçede metaforlar [Metaphors in Uzbek]. Doctoral dissertation, Cukurova University.Google Scholar
Johanson, L. (2006). Uzbek. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, Vol. 13 (pp.287–290). Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merhan, A. (2008). Özbek dilinde betimleyici (deskriptif) eylemler [Descriptive verbs in Uzbek]. Journal of Turkish Studies (JTS/TUBA) 32(1), 367–383.Google Scholar
O’zbekiston Respublikasi Fanlar Akademiyasi Alisher Navoiy Nomidagi Til va Adabiyot Instituti. (2006–2008). O’zbek tilining izohli lug’ati (I-V) [Comprehensive dictionary of Uzbek I-V]. Toshkent: “O’zbekiston Milli Entsiklopediyasi” Davlat Ilmiy Nashriyoti. [URL] kitoblar.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Falck, Marlene Johansson & Lacey Okonski
2022. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (pims): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics 8:2 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.