Cover not available
Part of
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 333–368

Chapter 9
From perception to sensory experiences

A paradigm shift

ORCID logo
ORCID logo
ORCID logo
ORCID logo
Article outline
  • 9.1Sensory experience: Main concepts at work
    • 9.1.1Sensory experience as psychological invariants in memory
    • 9.1.2Reconsidering the five senses: Holisensoriality
    • 9.1.3Umwelt and meaning
  • 9.2Sensory categories as “acts of meaning”
    • 9.2.1From “natural categories” to categories as “acts of meaning”
    • 9.2.2“Ad hoc” categories, embodied and situated cognition
      • 9.2.2.1From “natural” to “ad hoc” categories (Barsalou)
      • 9.2.2.2From Rosch to Varela: From embodiment to phenomenology
      • 9.2.2.3Hutchins’s distributed cognition in the “wild”
  • 9.3Senses, sensors, and material culture
  • 9.4Sense(s) and symbolic systems
    • 9.4.1Language(s) matter(s): Signifier and signified
    • 9.4.2From words to meaning constitution in discourse
  • 9.5Sense(s) and knowledges
    • 9.5.1Knowledge vs. knowledges
    • 9.5.2Beyond dualisms: Unification of knowledges and meaning constitution
    • 9.5.3From multidisciplinarity to interdisciplinarity
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.09dub
References
Aikhenvald, A.
(2004) Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, M. N., & Avenier, M. J.
(2011) Légitimation de savoirs élaborés dans une épistémologie constructiviste à partir de l’expérience de praticiens. Recherches qualitatives, 30 (2), 22–47.Google Scholar
Althusser, L.
(1967) Philosophie et philosophie spontanée des savants. Paris, France: Maspero.Google Scholar
Arvanitis, R., Grossetti, M., Raj, K., Renaud, P., & Thomas, F.
(2008) Sciences, savoirs et mondialisations. Science et devenir de l’homme, 57–58, 50–71.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 111 (3), 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Deriving categories to achieve goals. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 27, 1–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Perceptual Symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (4), 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in cognitive science, 2(4), 716–724.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C.
(1933) Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 187–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergue, A.
(2014) La mésologie : pourquoi et pourquoi faire ? Nanterre, France: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P.
(1969) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bieler, L. M., & Dubois, D.
(2011) Communicating taste: a dialogical perspective on meaning constitution in conversation about taste. In Proceedings of Les descripteurs du vin, Vino lingua (pp. 1–19). Dijon, France.Google Scholar
Boschi, L., Delcor, L., Le Carrou, J.-L., Fritz, C., Paté, A., & Holtzman, B.
(2017) On the perception of audified seismograms. Seismological research letters, 88(5), 1279–1289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G.
(1956) A study of thinking. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., Postman, L., & Rodrigues, J.
(1951) Expectation and the perception of color. The American journal of psychology, 64(2), 216–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E.
(2004) The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT press.Google Scholar
Calvo, P., & Gomila, T.
(2008) Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cance, C.
(2008) Expériences de la couleur, ressources linguistiques et processus discursifs dans la construction d’un espace visuel : l’habitacle automobile (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 3.
Cance, C., & Dubois, D.
(2015) Dire notre expérience du sonore: Nomination et dénomination. Langue Française, 188(4), 15–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B.
(2004) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies : Dictionnaire des intraduisibles. Paris: Éditions Seuil, Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J., & Wood, M.
(2014) Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D.
(1998) The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 10–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A., & Fujimura, J.
(1992) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H., & Lefevre, C.
(2005) Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cristinoi, A., & Cance, C.
(2018) Stratégies de dénomination et de désignation des couleurs en palikur. Amerindia, 40, 1–34.Google Scholar
Cytowic, R. E.
(1993) The man who tasted shapes. New York, NY, USA: Putnam.Google Scholar
(1995) Synesthesia: Phenomenology and neuropsychology. Psyche, 2(10), 2–10.Google Scholar
Davidoff, J., Davies, I., & Roberson, D.
(1999) Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398(6724), 203–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R.
(1996) Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1641) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Méditations métaphysiques. Paris, France: Flammarion. (First published 1641)Google Scholar
Despret, V.
(2012) Que diraient les animaux si on leur posait les bonnes questions ? Paris, France: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Dubois, D.
(2000) Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35–68.Google Scholar
(2012) Dénommer, définir, identifier, décrire une ambiance – A semantic analysis of the word “soundscape”. In Ambiances in action. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Ambiances / Ambiances en acte(s). Actes du 2nd Congrès International sur les Ambiances (pp. 683–688). Montréal, Canada: International Ambiances Network.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Coler, M., & Wörtche, H.
(2014) Knowledge Sensory Experience, and Sensor Technology. In B. J. C. Rangacharyula, E. Haven (Ed.), The world in prismatic views (pp. 97–133). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, D., & Resche-Rigon, P.
(1995) De la “naturalité” des catégories sémantiques des catégories d’objets naturels aux catégories lexicales. Intellectica, 20(1), 217–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) La construction des catégories sémantiques en discours : l’exemple des couleurs et des odeurs. In J. Härma, J. Korhonen, & N. T. (Eds.), La langue en contexte (Vol. 78, pp. 405–418).Google Scholar
Eckert, P.
(2006) Communities of practice. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2(2006), 683–685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eco, U.
(1997) Kant e l’ornotorinco. Milan, Italy: Bompiani.Google Scholar
(1999) Kant et l’ ornithorinque. Paris, France: Grasset.Google Scholar
Ellen, R.
(2006) The categorical impulse: essay in the anthropology of classifying behavior. New York, NY, USA: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Roque, L. S., & Majid, A.
(2018) Smell Is Coded in Grammar and Frequent in Discourse: Cha’palaa Olfactory Language in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 28(2), 175–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(2010) Psychology in cognitive science: 1978–2038. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (3), 328–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
(1979) The ecological Approach to visual Perception. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goody, J.
(1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guastavino, C.
(2006) The ideal urban soundscape: Investigating the sound quality of French cities. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92(6), 945–951.Google Scholar
(2007) Categorization of environmental sounds. Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 61 (1), 54–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guedou, G., & Coninckx, C.
(1986) La dénomination des couleurs chez les Fon. Journal Des Africanistes, 56(1), 67–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havelange, V., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J.
(2003) Les représentations : mémoire externe et objets techniques. Intellectica, 35, 115–131.Google Scholar
Heider, E. R.
(1972) Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of experimental psychology, 93(1), 10–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermann, T., Hunt, A., & Neuhoff, J. G.
(2011) The sonification handbook. Berlin, Germany: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Hiramatsu, K., & Minoura, K.
(2000) Response to urban sounds in relation to the residents’ connection with the sound sources. Proceedings Internoise 2000.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(1988) On the odour of the soul: Spatial representation and olfactory classification in Eastern Indonesia and Western Melanesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde, 144 (1), 84–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Introduction: Empires of the senses. Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader, 1–17.Google Scholar
(2011) Cultural synaesthesia: Neuropsychological versus anthropological approaches to the study of intersensoriality. Intellectica, 55(1), 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D., & Classen, C.
(2013) Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society (1st Edition ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D., & Marcoux, J.-S.
(2006) Introduction à la culture du sensible. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 30(3), 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008) The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 363(1499), 2011–2019. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Indergand, M.
(1994) De l’expérience matérielle à l’expérience immatérielle de la couleur : manière d’agir, manière de penser, évolutions et ruptures In La couleur. Regards croisés sur la couleur du Moyen âge au XXème siècle (pp. 7–16). Paris, France: Le Léopard d’Or.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1975) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic semantics (pp. 221–271). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(1986) Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In H. Kuklick (Ed.), Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present (Vol. 6, pp. 1–40). JAI Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Le topofil de Boa-Vista. La référence scientifique : montage photo-philosophique. Raisons Pratiques, 4, 187–216.Google Scholar
(1996) On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Circulating Reference: Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest. In B. Latour (Ed.), Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 24–79). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J.
(1988) Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lecointre, G., & Guyader, H. L.
(2001) Classification phylogénétique du vivant. Paris, France: Belin.Google Scholar
Le Moigne, J. L.
(2002) Le constructivisme, tome 2: Epistémologie de l’interdisciplinarité. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(2009) Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense making. Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Loken, B., Barsalou, L., & Joiner, C.
(2008) Categorization theory and research in consumer psychology: Category Representation and Category-Based Inference. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 133–163). New York, NY, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maris, E., Stallen, P. J., Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H.
(2007) Noise within the social context: Annoyance reduction through fair procedures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121 (4), 2000–2010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxim, L.
(2009) Du méta-discours aux métaconnaissances : quand l’expertise sensorielle se forge dans la parole. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 339–356). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Medin, D., & Atran, S.
(1999) Folk biology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
(1955) Les aventures de la dialectique. Paris, Fance: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morel, J., Marquis-Favre, C., Dubois, D., & Pierrette, M.
(2012) Road traffic in urban areas: A perceptual and cognitive typology of pass-by noises. Acta acustica united with acustica, 98(1), 166–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U.
(1982) Memory: What are the important questions. Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts, 3–19.Google Scholar
Neisser, U., & Winograd, E.
(1995) Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (No. 2). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, S. P., & Murphy, G. L.
(2003) An apple is more than just a fruit: Cross-classification in children’s concepts. Child Development, 74(6), 1783–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noë, A.
(2002) On what we see. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 83(1), 57–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Action in perception. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norman, D.
(2014) Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Diversion Books.Google Scholar
Paté, A., Boschi, L., Dubois, D., Le Carrou, J.-L., & Holtzman, B.
(2017) Auditory display of seismic data: On the use of expert’s categorizations and verbal descriptions as heuristics for geoscience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (3), 2143–2162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paté, A., Boschi, L., Le Carrou, J.-L., & Holtzman, B.
(2016) Categorization of seismic sources by auditory display: A blind test. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 85, 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitmengin, C.
(2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive sciences, 5 (3–4), 229–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pigliucci, M.
(2012) Who knows what. Aeon Magazine.Google Scholar
Plümacher, M., & Holz, P.
(2006) Speaking of colors and odors. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synesthesia, A window into Perception, Thought and Language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Repko, A. F.
(2008) Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage.Google Scholar
Rosch, E.
(1978) Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Advances in cross culture Psychology (Vol. 1). London, UK: Academic press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B.
(1978) Principles of categorisation. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L.
(1999) Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology, 38(4), 495–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G., & Moghaddam, F.
(2014) Interobjectivity. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., … Majid, A.
(2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de
(2011) Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press. (First published 1916)Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de, C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger
(1971) Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne, Switzerland: Payot. (First published 1916)Google Scholar
Selosse, P.
(2000) Un aspect de l’épistémè de la renaissance : méthode et “nomenclature” dans l’oeuvre botanique de Caspar Bauhin (1560–1624) (PhD Thesis). Université Paris IV – Sorbonne.
Speed, L. J., O Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A.
(2019) Perception metaphors (Vol. 19). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C.
(2011) Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, S.
(2018) Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I.
(1987) D’une science à l’autre, des concepts nomades. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tornay, S.
(1978) Voir et nommer les couleurs (No. 2). Nanterre, France: Laboratoire d’ethnologie et de sociologie comparative.Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. V.
(1957) A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept (pp. 5–80). New York, NY, US: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
(1965) Mondes animaux et monde humain. Paris, France: Denoël.Google Scholar
(1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42(1), 25–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, J. V., & Kriszat, G.
(1934) Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen: ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J.
(1988) Connaître: Les sciences cognitives, tendances et perspectives. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) L’inscription corporelle de l’esprit. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Vignaux, G.
(1999) Le démon du classement : penser, organiser. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Vion, R.
(2009) De la subjectivité en discours aux discours sur la subjectivité. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 367–391). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L.
(1997) Pensée et langage. Paris, France: La Dispute. (First published 1934)Google Scholar
Wagoner, B.
(2011) Meaning construction in remembering: A synthesis of bartlett and vygotsky. Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges, 105–114.Google Scholar
Wallon, H.
(1956) La psychologie génétique. Bulletin de psychologie, 10(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
(1963) Les origines de la pensée chez l’enfant. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Warnier, J.-P.
(1999) Construire la culture matérielle: l’homme qui pensait avec ses doigts. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watsuji, T.
(1935) Fudo. Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami.Google Scholar
(2011) Fudo, le milieu humain. Paris, France: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R.
(1999) The dubbing ceremony revisited: Object naming and categorization in infancy and early childhood. Folkbiology, 233–284.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R.
(2006) Collected Poems, 1943–2004. Orlando, FL, USA: First Harvest Edition.Google Scholar
Winter, B.
(2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor (Vol. 20). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar