Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics
| University of Leeds
Metaphor is a topical issue across a number of disciplines, wherever researchers are concerned with how speakers and writers package and process messages. This book is addressed at readers from diverse academic backgrounds who are interested in ways of researching metaphor from different perspectives, and especially through corpus linguistics. A number of approaches to and exploitations of metaphor, including conceptual metaphor theory and cognitive approaches more generally, text and spoken discourse analysis, and CDA, are discussed, explored and critiqued using corpus data. The book also includes corpus linguistic studies of different aspects of metaphor, which investigate its linguistic and semantic properties and relate them to current theoretical views. The book demonstrates the need for naturally-occurring language data to be used in the development of metaphor theory, and shows the value of corpus data and techniques in this work.
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 6] 2005. x, 236 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
Introduction
|
1–9
|
|
Part I.: Current models of metaphor and metonymy
|
|
|
1. Conceptual Metaphor Theory and language
|
13–32
|
|
2. Defining metaphor
|
33–52
|
|
3. Metaphor and metonymy
|
53–71
|
|
Part II: Current research into metaphor
|
|
|
4. Corpus research into metaphor
|
75–102
|
|
5. Cognitive and psycholinguistic approaches to metaphor research
|
103–122
|
|
6. Discourse approaches to metaphor research
|
123–142
|
|
Part III. The examination of corpus data
|
|
|
7. The grammar of metaphor
|
145–167
|
|
8. Semantic relations in source and target domains
|
169–192
|
|
9. Metaphor and collocation
|
193–213
|
|
10. Conclusion
|
215–224
|
|
References
|
225–231
|
|
Index
|
233–235
|
“Deignan's book is an important contribution to metaphor theory and corpus linguistics. It is clearly written and well organized. It is essential reading for anyone interested in corpus linguistics or metaphor.”
Professor Patrick Hanks, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, in the International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 15:1 (2010)
“The book proves to be an interesting contribution to the existing literature on metaphor, as well as a guidance for future research.”
Enrico Monti,
University of Bologna, Italy, in ICLA-review, February 2008
Cited by
Cited by 217 other publications
No author info given
2010. Metaphor in Discourse by Elena Semino.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:1 ► pp. 149 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Literary Language and Characterization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 18],
No author info given
2014.
In A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Literary Language and Characterization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 18],
No author info given
2014.
In The Spatial Language of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 42],
No author info given
2016.
In Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 23],
No author info given
2018.
In The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3],
Abid, Raith Zeher, Shakila Abdul Manan & Zuhair Abdul Amir Abdul Rahman
2017. ‘A flood of Syrians has slowed to a trickle’: The use of metaphors in the representation of Syrian refugees in the online media news reports of host and non-host countries.
Discourse & Communication 11:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Al-Hindawi, Fareed Hameed & Wafaa S. Al-Saate
2016. Ontological Metaphor in Economic News Reports: A Pragmatic Approach.
SSRN Electronic Journal
ALOUSQUE, ISABEL NEGRO
2014. Verbo-pictorial metaphor in French advertising.
Journal of French Language Studies 24:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Anderson, Wendy
2008. Corpus Linguistics in the UK: Resources for Sociolinguistic Research.
Language and Linguistics Compass 2:2 ► pp. 352 ff.
Anderson, Wendy
2019.
In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],
► pp. 65 ff.
Andrews, Nadine
2018. How Cognitive Frames about Nature May Affect Felt Sense of Nature Connectedness.
Ecopsychology 10:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Andrews, Nadine
2019.
In Climate Psychology [Studies in the Psychosocial, ],
► pp. 61 ff.
Ansah, Gladys Nyarko
2014. Cognitive models of anger in Akan.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Ansah, Gladys Nyarko
2014. Culture in Embodied Cognition: Metaphorical/Metonymic Conceptualizations ofFEARin Akan and English.
Metaphor and Symbol 29:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Arcimaviciene, Liudmila
2015. EU Universities’ Mission Statements.
SAGE Open 5:2 ► pp. 215824401558437 ff.
Arcimaviciene, Liudmila
2019.
In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81],
► pp. 137 ff.
Awier, Martyna
2019. Donald Trump’s political campaign rhetoric. A cognitive study.
Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :27(4) ► pp. 4 ff.
Bakhtiar, Mohsen
2015. Cognitive model of GHEIRAT in Persian.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Bakhtiar, Mohsen
2017. The role of context in the formation of hejab ‘veiling’ metaphors in hejab billboards and posters in Iran.
Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “To be Irish, gay, and on the outside”.
Journal of Language and Sexuality 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Baş, Melike
2020. A comparative critical metaphor analysis on the concept of democracy in Turkish and American English.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 535 ff.
Beligné, Max
2017. Des espaces dans la détection de métaphores.
Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales 12:2 ► pp. 69 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 17 ff.
Bielenia-Grajewska, Magdalena, Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell
2013.
In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
► pp. 1206 ff.
Bielenia-Grajewska, Magdalena, Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell
2017.
In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
► pp. 1 ff.
Bielenia-Grajewska, Magdalena, Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell
2020.
In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
► pp. 1558 ff.
Bisiada, Mario
2018. A cross-linguistic analysis of the ‘homework’ metaphor in German and English political discourse.
Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 609 ff.
Black, Alexis D.
2018. Wor(l)d-Building: Simulation and Metaphor at the Mars Desert Research Station.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Borgogni, Daniele
2017. Clipped Wings and the Great Abyss: Cognitive Stylistics and Implicatures in Abiezer Coppe’s ‘Prophetic’ Recantation.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Bosman, Nerina
2019. The cup as metaphor and symbol: A cognitive linguistics perspective.
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 75:3
Caballero, Rosario
2007. BOOK REVIEW.
Metaphor and Symbol 22:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2007. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Zoltán Kövecses, Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005, xv + 314 pages, $29.95 (paperback). ISBN: 0-5216-9612-7.
Metaphor and Symbol 22:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Cameron, Lynne
2011.
In Creativity in Language and Literature,
► pp. 68 ff.
Cameron, Lynne J.
2007. Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk.
Discourse & Society 18:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Castaño, Emilia Castaño & Isabel Verdaguer Clavera
2018. Metonymies and metaphors of sadness in the Old English vocabulary.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014.
In Analysing Political Speeches,
► pp. 174 ff.
Chatti, Sami
2020. Seasonal metaphors in Arab journalistic discourse.
Metaphor and the Social World 10:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Chen, Jun, Yuesheng Gu & Yanpei Liu
2012. Grid Service Concurrency Control Protocol.
Journal of Networks 7:4
Chen, Shujun & Changqing Zheng
2020. Perception Metaphors.
Metaphor and Symbol 35:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Cheng, Winnie & Janet Ho
2017. A Corpus Study of Bank Financial Analyst Reports: Semantic Fields and Metaphors.
International Journal of Business Communication 54:3 ► pp. 258 ff.
Ci-hua, Xu
2009. Book review: ELENA SEMINO, Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 247 pp., ISBN 978521867306 (hbk).
Discourse Studies 11:6 ► pp. 745 ff.
Clarke, Jean S., Joep P. Cornelissen & Mark P. Healey
2019. Actions Speak Louder than Words: How Figurative Language and Gesturing in Entrepreneurial Pitches Influences Investment Judgments.
Academy of Management Journal 62:2 ► pp. 335 ff.
Coghill, Mary
2016.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy,
► pp. 1 ff.
Coker, Amy
2019. How filthy was Cleopatra?.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Cornelissen, Joep P.
2007. Metonymy in Language about Organizations: A Corpus-Based Study of Company Names.
Journal of Management Studies 0:0 ► pp. 071115153913002 ff.
Cornelissen, Joep P.
2012. Sensemaking Under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of Sense.
Organization Science 23:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Cornelissen, Joep P. & Mario Kafouros
2008. The Emergent Organization: Primary and Complex Metaphors in Theorizing about Organizations.
Organization Studies 29:7 ► pp. 957 ff.
Cornelissen, Joep P., Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara
2014. The Contraction of Meaning: The Combined Effect of Communication, Emotions, and Materiality on Sensemaking in the Stockwell Shooting.
Journal of Management Studies 51:5 ► pp. 699 ff.
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Cuccio, Valentina & Vittorio Gallese
2018. A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373:1752 ► pp. 20170128 ff.
Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
2019. Teoría de la metáfora conceptual y teoría de la metáfora deliberada: ¿propuestas complementarias?.
Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :68 ► pp. 165 ff.
Dai, Yuanjun, Zhiwei Wu & Hai Xu
2019. The Effect of Types of Dictionary Presentation on the Retention of Metaphorical Collocations: Involvement Load Hypothesis vs. Cognitive Load Theory.
International Journal of Lexicography 32:4 ► pp. 411 ff.
DAVID, OANA & TEENIE MATLOCK
2018. Cross-linguistic automated detection of metaphors for poverty and
cancer.
Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 467 ff.
Davidson, Paul
2013. The role of ‘social exclusion’ and other metaphors in contemporary British social policy: a cognitive critical approach.
Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 206 ff.
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
Degani, Marta
2018. From the light of truth to the dark alleys of tyranny
.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Deignan, Alice
2015.
In International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography,
► pp. 1 ff.
Deignan, Alice
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 79 ff.
Deignan, Alice, Elena Semino & Shirley-Anne Paul
2019. Metaphors of Climate Science in Three Genres: Research Articles, Educational Texts, and Secondary School Student Talk.
Applied Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Demjén, Zsófia & Elena Semino
2020.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
► pp. 213 ff.
Demmen, Jane, Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, Veronika Koller, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson & Sheila Payne
2015. A computer-assisted study of the use of Violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Denroche, Charles
2018. Text metaphtonymy.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Dodge, Ellen K.
2016. A deep semantic corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Domaradzki, Mikolaj
2018. Health metaphors and embodiment in Arab economic discourse.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Dumitriu, Diana-Luiza & Elena Negrea-Busuioc
2017. Sports metaphors and women’s empowerment in the 2014 European election campaign in Romania.
Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Díaz-Peralta, Marina
2018. Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse.
Discourse & Communication 12:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Díaz-Vera, Javier E.
2014. From Cognitive Linguistics to Historical Sociolinguistics.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Ehineni, Taiwo
2017. From Conceptual Metaphors to Cultural Metaphors: Metaphorical Language in Yoruba Proverbs and Praise Poems.
Language Matters 48:3 ► pp. 130 ff.
Essoh, Eugenie Grace
2019.
In Popular Representations of America in Non-American Media [Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts, ],
► pp. 106 ff.
Essoh, Grace Eugenie Ndobo
2020.
In Deconstructing Images of the Global South Through Media Representations and Communication [Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts, ],
► pp. 253 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara
2011. Experiential metaphors in Latin: feelings were containers, movements and things possessed1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 109:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara
2016.
In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174],
► pp. 115 ff.
Ferentzy, Peter & Nigel E. Turner
2012. Morals, medicine, metaphors, and the history of the disease model of problem gambling.
Journal of Gambling Issues :27
Ferentzy, Peter & Nigel E. Turner
2013.
In The History of Problem Gambling,
► pp. 5 ff.
Francisco, Virginia, Raquel Hervás, Gonzalo Méndez & Paloma Galván
2018. Exploring the Potential of Concept Associations for the Creative Generation of Linguistic Artifacts: A Case Study With Riddles and Rhetorical Figures.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Franssila, Sanna
2013. Sell Metaphors in American Political News Discourse.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 ► pp. 418 ff.
Fuertes Olivera, Pedro A.
2010. The contribution of Herrero Ruiz’s Understanding Tropes to the interplay between Cognitive Linguistics and Pragmatics.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 207 ff.
Gatambuki Gathigia, Moses, Ruth W. Ndung’u & Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo
2015. When romantic love in Gĩkũyũ becomes a human body part.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Gathigia, Moses Gatambuki, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo Minervino & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2018. A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2 ► pp. 359 ff.
Gavins, Joanna
2006. The year’s work in stylistics 2005.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 15:4 ► pp. 381 ff.
GIBBS, RAYMOND W.
2006. Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation.
Mind <html_ent glyph="
amp;" ascii="&"/> Language 21:3 ► pp. 434 ff.
amp;" ascii="&"/> Language 21:3 ► pp. 434 ff. Glebkin, Vladimir
2014. Cultural-historical psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and metaphor.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014.
In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],
► pp. 307 ff.
Goatly, Andrew
2011.
In Affective Computing and Sentiment Analysis [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 45],
► pp. 13 ff.
Golshaie, Ramin & Arsalan Golfam
2015. Processing Conventional Conceptual Metaphors in Persian: A Corpus-Based Psycholinguistic Study.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44:5 ► pp. 495 ff.
Group, Pragglejaz
2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.
Metaphor and Symbol 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Group, Pragglejaz
2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.
Metaphor and Symbol 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gustafsson, Anna W, Charlotte Hommerberg & Anna Sandgren
2020. Coping by metaphors: the versatile function of metaphors in blogs about living with advanced cancer.
Medical Humanities 46:3 ► pp. 267 ff.
Hanks, Patrick
2017.
In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596],
► pp. 54 ff.
Herrmann, J. Berenike & Tony Berber Sardinha
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 3 ff.
Ho, Janet
2020. “She Starts Breakdancing, I Swear!”: Metaphor, Framing, and Digital Pregnancy Discussions.
Metaphor and Symbol 35:3 ► pp. 171 ff.
Hocking, Darryl
2018.
In Communicating Creativity,
► pp. 135 ff.
Hommerberg, Charlotte, Anna W. Gustafsson & Anna Sandgren
2020. Battle, Journey, Imprisonment and Burden: patterns of metaphor use in blogs about living with advanced cancer.
BMC Palliative Care 19:1
Huang, Jie
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 302 ff.
Hurtienne, Jörn
2017. How Cognitive Linguistics Inspires HCI: Image Schemas and Image-Schematic Metaphors.
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Jaworska, Sylvia
2017. Metaphors We Travel by: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Metaphors in Promotional Tourism Discourse.
Metaphor and Symbol 32:3 ► pp. 161 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2016. What trajectors reveal about TIME metaphors.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2018. From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically?.
Metaphor and Symbol 33:2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Just, Sine Nørholm
2009. No place like home?.
Journal of Language and Politics 8:2 ► pp. 244 ff.
Kaphesi, Elias
2014. Third-year University Mathematics Education Students' Metaphorical Understanding of Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18:3 ► pp. 276 ff.
Katz, Albert
2017.
In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],
► pp. 237 ff.
Koller, Veronika
2009.
In Metaphor and Discourse,
► pp. 116 ff.
Krennmayr, Tina
2015. What Corpus Linguistics Can Tell Us About Metaphor Use In Newspaper Texts.
Journalism Studies 16:4 ► pp. 530 ff.
Krennmayr, Tina & Gerard Steen
2017.
In Handbook of Linguistic Annotation,
► pp. 1053 ff.
Krishnamurthy, Ramesh
2018.
In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],
► pp. 35 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2015. Surprise as a conceptual category.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020.
In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
Kövecses, Zoltán, Laura Ambrus, Dániel Hegedűs, Ren Imai & Anna Sobczak
2019.
In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],
► pp. 149 ff.
Lai, Huei-Ling, Kawai Chui, Wen-Hui Sah, Siaw-Fong Chung & Chao-Lin Liu
2018.
In Big Data in Computational Social Science and Humanities [Computational Social Sciences, ],
► pp. 195 ff.
Lederer, Jenny
2016. Finding source domain triggers.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:4 ► pp. 527 ff.
Lee, Mary
2015. Critical metaphor analysis of citizenship education discourse.
Public Relations Inquiry 4:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Leung, Danny Chung-hong & Crisp Peter
2011.
In Researching Chinese Learners,
► pp. 43 ff.
Li, Shuangling
2014.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],
► pp. 79 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette, Satomi Arizono & Alice May
2016. The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette, Tina Krennmayr, James Turner & Sarah Turner
2014. An Investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language Writing.
Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
Lu, Xiaofei
2014.
In Computational Methods for Corpus Annotation and Analysis,
► pp. 175 ff.
Lu, Xiaofei & Ben Pin-Yun Wang
2017. Towards a metaphor-annotated corpus of Mandarin Chinese.
Language Resources and Evaluation 51:3 ► pp. 663 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2011. Review of Kövecses (2010): Metaphor: A Practical Introduction.
Metaphor and the Social World 1:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2020.
In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],
► pp. 331 ff.
Machova, Svetlana & Jana Kleckova
2012.
In Intelligent Information and Database Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7198],
► pp. 163 ff.
Mahpeykar, Narges & Andrea Tyler
2011.
In Spatial Information Theory [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6899],
► pp. 413 ff.
Makoae, Aloysia
2016. Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor in the Sesotho Catholic Church Hymnbook,Lifela Tsa Bakriste: Denoting theMetaphors of Connotative Names.
Studies of Tribes and Tribals 14:2 ► pp. 148 ff.
Mannoni, Michele
2020. A corpus-based approach to the translation of conceptual metaphors in legal language: Chinese Yuān (冤) and English ‘Injustice’, ‘Wrong’ and ‘Tort’.
Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff.
McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa J.
2011. The role of metaphor in shaping the identity and agenda of the United Nations: The imagining of an international community and international threat.
Discourse & Communication 5:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Meier, Petra & Emanuela Lombardo
2009.
In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors,
► pp. 235 ff.
Ming, Liu
2015. Scapegoat or manipulated victim? Metaphorical representations of the Sino-US currency dispute in Chinese and American financial news.
Text & Talk 35:3
Miyazawa, Akira & Yusuke Miyao
2019. Automatically Computable Metrics to Generate Metaphorical Verb Expressions.
Journal of Natural Language Processing 26:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Morilova, Ekaterina Sergeevna & Karolina Leonidovna Stepanovaite
2018. SPECIFICITY OF TRANSLATING THE METAPHORICAL MODEL “MEDICINE IS A DETECTIVE STORY”<i/>INTO RUSSIAN (BY THE MATERIAL OF THE MEDICAL TV SERIES “HOUSE, M.D.”).
Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :10-1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Muelas Gil, María
2016.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 107 ff.
Muhammad, Nurul Nadia & Sabariah Md Rashid
2014. Cat Metaphors in Malay and English Proverbs.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 118 ► pp. 335 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2018.
In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],
► pp. 249 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2021.
In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2021.
In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 51 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst & W. Gudrun Reijnierse
2019.
In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22],
► pp. 42 ff.
Nazar, Leonardo
2015. Metaphor in language, discourse, and history.
Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Neary, Clara
2017. “Truth is like a vast tree”.
Metaphor and the Social World 7:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Nguyen, Van Trao
2016. The cross-cultural analysis of the metaphorical conceptualization of happiness in English and Vietnamese.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Nokele, Amanda BB
2014. Identifying conceptual metaphors using the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU).
South African Journal of African Languages 34:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Norocel, Ov Cristian
2010. Romania is a family and it needs a strict father: conceptual metaphors at work in radical right populist discourses.
Nationalities Papers 38:5 ► pp. 705 ff.
Omori, Ayako
2008. Emotion as a Huge Mass of Moving Water.
Metaphor and Symbol 23:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Onysko, Alexander
2017. Conceptual metaphor variation in meaning interpretation.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
O’Mara-Shimek, Michael
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 23 ff.
Palagar, John Ivan V.
2015.
In Language Endangerment [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 7],
► pp. 65 ff.
Pasma, Tryntje
2019.
In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22],
► pp. 92 ff.
Patil, Gouri Shanker, R. Rangasayee & Geetha Mukundan
2014. Non-fluent aphasia in deaf user of Indian Sign Language.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Patterson, Katie J.
2016. The Analysis of Metaphor: To What Extent Can the Theory of Lexical Priming Help Our Understanding of Metaphor Usage and Comprehension?.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Patterson, Katie J.
2017.
In Lexical Priming [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 79],
► pp. 142 ff.
Patterson, Katie J.
2017. When Is a Metaphor Not a Metaphor? An Investigation Into Lexical Characteristics of Metaphoricity Among Uncertain Cases.
Metaphor and Symbol 32:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Patterson, Katie J.
2018.
In Understanding Metaphor through Corpora,
► pp. 43 ff.
Perak, Benedikt
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 205 ff.
Peters, Joachim, Natalie Dykes, Mechthild Habermann, Christoph Ostgathe & Maria Heckel
2019. Metaphors in German newspaper articles on multidrug-resistant bacteria in clinical contexts, 1995–2015.
Metaphor and the Social World 9:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Philip, Gill
2018.
In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],
► pp. 127 ff.
Plug, Leendert, Basil Sharrack & Markus Reuber
2011. Metaphors in the description of seizure experiences: Common expressions and differential diagnosis.
Language and Cognition 3:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
PONTEROTTO, DIANE
2017. Motion for emotion: an empirical cross-linguistic study of conceptual construals.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Potts, Amanda & Elena Semino
2019. Cancer as a Metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:2 ► pp. 81 ff.
RASSE, CARINA, ALEXANDER ONYSKO & FRANCESCA M. M. CITRON
2020. Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: a psycholinguistic approach.
Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Rasulić, Katarina
2020.
In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87],
► pp. 111 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use.
Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Metaphor in communication: the distribution of potentially deliberate metaphor across register and word class.
Corpora 14:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Ritchie, L. David
2007. Gateshead Revisited: Perceptual Simulators and Fields of Meaning in the Analysis of Metaphors.
Metaphor and Symbol 23:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
Roldan Riejos, Ana Maria
2016.
In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],
► pp. 187 ff.
Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Georgina Cuadrado
2015. Metaphor and Figurative Meaning Construction in Science and Technology (English and Spanish).
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212 ► pp. 271 ff.
SANFORD, DANIEL
2014. Idiom as the intersection of conceptual and syntactic schemas.
Language and Cognition 6:4 ► pp. 492 ff.
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Consuelo Vásquez & Joep Cornelissen
2016. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox.
Human Relations 69:4 ► pp. 915 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2019.
In Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação,
► pp. 19 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2020. Talking about intercultural experiences.
International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Scott, Eric M. & Shelley Ching-yu Depner
2016.
In Embodiment in Language (II),
► pp. 177 ff.
Semino, Elena
2010. Descriptions of Pain, Metaphor, and Embodied Simulation.
Metaphor and Symbol 25:4 ► pp. 205 ff.
Semino, Elena
2011.
In Creativity in Language and Literature,
► pp. 83 ff.
Shitikov, Pyotr M.
2017. Metaphor “CHRIST IS THE SHEPHERD” in Versions of John’s Gospel.
Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates 3:3 ► pp. 145 ff.
Siahaan, Poppy
2015.
In The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language, 107],
► pp. 666 ff.
Simpson, Zach
2009. “Totally in the Zone”: Using metaphor to ‘glimpse’ writer-identity.
Education as Change 13:1 ► pp. 195 ff.
Simpson, Zach, Nickey Janse van Rensburg & Dalien Rene Benecke
2017.
In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON),
► pp. 219 ff.
Simó, Judit
2008. Chess Metaphors in American English and Hungarian.
Metaphor and Symbol 24:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Skorczynska, Hanna & Rosa Giménez-Moreno
2017. Analysing metaphor in the family register through scripted sitcom conversations.
Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 252 ff.
Skrynnikova, Inna V.
2020. Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoor.
Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research 4:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova
2018. Denominal verbs with metaphorical meanings in British business media discourse.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2021.
In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],
Solopova, Olga & Maria Ilyushkina
2017. RUSSIA AS A TARGET DOMAIN IN AMERICAN, BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSES.
Bulletin of the South Ural State University series Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 41 ff.
Spinolo, Nicoletta
2018.
In Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 133 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2008. The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol 23:4 ► pp. 213 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2011. The language of knowledge management: A linguistic approach to metaphor analysis.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Stickles, Elise, Oana David, Ellen K. Dodge & Jisup Hong
2016. Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Strugielska, Ariadna
2015.
In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],
► pp. 65 ff.
Strugielska, Ariadna & Teresa Siek-Piskozub
2013.
In Correspondences and Contrasts in Foreign Language Pedagogy and Translation Studies [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 17 ff.
Sullivan, Karen
2014. Visibility and economy as dimensions of metaphoric language.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Sullivan, Karen
2016. Integrating constructional semantics and conceptual metaphor.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Dr Tanweer Ali & O'Mara-Shimek, Michael
2015. A communicative efficiency and effectiveness model for using metaphor and metonymy in financial news reporting.
On the Horizon 23:3 ► pp. 216 ff.
Dr Tanweer Ali & Pühringer, Stephan
2015. Markets as “ultimate judges” of economic policies: Angela Merkel’s discourse profile during the economic crisis and the European crisis policies.
On the Horizon 23:3 ► pp. 246 ff.
Tay, Dennis
2015. Metaphor in case study articles on Chinese university counseling service websites.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Tenorio, Encarnación Hidalgo
2009.
In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors,
► pp. 112 ff.
Thalhammer, Elmar J.
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 101 ff.
Thøger Christensen, Lars & Joep Cornelissen
2011. Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future.
Management Communication Quarterly 25:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Tincheva, Nelly
2019. Conceptualizing Brexit.
International Journal of Language and Culture 6:2 ► pp. 255 ff.
Tincheva, Nelly
2019. “Brexit means…”.
Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 848 ff.
Trojszczak, Marcin
2019.
In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],
► pp. 209 ff.
Tuleja, Elizabeth A.
2017. Constructing Image-Based Culture Definitions Using Metaphors: Impact of a Cross-Cultural Immersive Experience.
Journal of Teaching in International Business 28:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019. Hans Lindquist and Magnus Levin: Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English.
Corpus Pragmatics 3:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel & Pamela Faber
2010. Strategies for the Semi-Automatic Retrieval of Metaphorical Terms.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
van den Heerik, Romy A. M., Ellen Droog, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa & Christian Burgers
2020. Thinking out of the box.
Internet Pragmatics 3:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Viimaranta, Johanna & Arto Mustajoki
2020. What Can Science, Religion, Politics, Culture and the Economy Do? A Corpus Study of Metonymical Conceptualization Combined with Personification.
Scando-Slavica 66:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Walther-Hansen, Mads
2016.
In Music, Mind, and Embodiment [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9617],
► pp. 228 ff.
Walther-Hansen, Mads & Mark Grimshaw
2016.
In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016,
► pp. 77 ff.
Wan, Wan & Graham Low
2015.
In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],
► pp. 1 ff.
White, Michael & Honesto Herrera
2009.
In Metaphor and Discourse,
► pp. 135 ff.
Wiliński, Jarosław
2017. War Metaphors in Business: A Metaphostructional Analysis.
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :26/2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Wilks, Yorick
2015.
In Language Production, Cognition, and the Lexicon [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 48],
► pp. 245 ff.
Williams Camus, Julia T.
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 245 ff.
Wyatt, Mark & Glenn Hadikin
2015. ‘They parked two buses’: a corpus study of a football expression.
English Today 31:4 ► pp. 34 ff.
Wyrwa, Anna
2019.
In Languages – Cultures – Worldviews,
► pp. 293 ff.
Yap, Foong Ha, Ariel Shuk-ling Chan & Brian Lap-ming Wai
2018.
In Not Just a Laughing Matter [The Humanities in Asia, 5],
► pp. 147 ff.
Yu, Ning & Jie Huang
2019. Primary Metaphors across Languages: Difficulty as Weight and Solidity.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Yu, Yating
2019. Metaphorical representations of “leftover women”: between traditional patriarchy and modern egalitarianism.
Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff.
Zawodniak, Joanna & Mariusz Kruk
2018.
In Challenges of Second and Foreign Language Education in a Globalized World [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 271 ff.
Zhang, Li, John A. Barnden, Robert J. Hendley & Alan M. Wallington
2006.
In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4133],
► pp. 68 ff.
İNAN, Dilek
2021. W. B. Yeats’in İmgeci Şiirlerinin Kavramsal Metafor Kuramı ile Yorumlanması.
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 20:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General