Article in:
Constructional Approach(es) to Discourse-Level Phenomena: Theoretical challenges and empirical advances
Edited by Renata Enghels and María Sol Sansiñena
[Constructions and Frames 13:1] 2021
► pp. 160191


Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
(2009) Deconstructing verbal humour with Construction Grammar. In Geert Brône & Jeroen Vandaele (eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, 289–314. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(2011) Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2594–2609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
(1994) Linguistic Theories of Humour. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
(2017) Computational resources: FrameNet and Constructicon. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 549–573. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brideau, Kate & Charles Berret
(2014) A brief introduction to Impact: ‘The meme font’. Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 307–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, Geert
(2008) Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humor. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2027–2061. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, Geert & Elizabeth Zima
(2014) Towards a dialogic construction grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3): 457–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bülow, Lars, Marie-Luis Merten & Michael Johann
(2018) Internet-Memes als Zugang zu multimodalen Konstruktionen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 69: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan
(2007) Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and domains. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 170–187. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana
(2001) Semantic Leaps: Frame Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
(1998) Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
(2005) Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Figurative Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
(2016) Discourse viewpoint as network. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds), Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities. De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 565–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
(1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Just for Hits (Saatchi & Saatchi New Creators Showcase). Available online at https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=GFn​-ixX9edg
Deppermann, Arnulf
(ed.) (2013) Conversation Analytic Studies of Multimodal Interaction. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1).Google Scholar
Devylder, Simon
(2019) Review of Barbara Dancygier (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. English Text Construction 12 (1): 143–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
(2007) The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–182. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feyaerts, Kurt, Geert Brône & Bert Oben
(2017) Multimodality in interaction. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 135–156. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
(1975) An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS), 123–31.
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Hanshin Publishing Co., 111–137.Google Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica 6 (2): 222–253.Google Scholar
(2003) Double-decker definitions: The role of frames in meaning explanations. Sign Language Studies 3 (3): 263–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 63 (3): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles
(2008) Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 462–482. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
(2009) Construction grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1 (2): 262–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Constructions and frames as interpretive clues. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24: 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Jennifer
(2014) Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Jennifer Riddle
(2017) Similes, Puns, and Counterfactuals in Literary Narrative. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher
(2016) The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society 27 (3): 335–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984–1985) British Miners’ Strike: A multimodal analysis. Discourse & Communication 11 (1): 3–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
(2017) Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1): 20160042. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Heidi E.
(2016) Pepper spray cop and the American dream: Using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric. Communication Studies 67 (1): 77–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
(ed.) (2014) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. 2nd edition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(2005) Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, 101–159. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
(2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold.Google Scholar
Lou, Adrian
(2017) Multimodal simile: The “when” meme in social media discourse. English Text Construction 10 (1): 106–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Machin, David
(2013) What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4): 347–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
(2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 121–144. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther
(2014) Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Laura A. Michaelis
(2010) A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2 (2): 158–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
(2012) An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media & Society 14 (2): 187–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Memes in Digital Culture. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
(2018) ‘Shunting the same idea back and forth’? Reappraising simile across text and image. Paper presented at the 2018 PALA conference, University of Birmingham (UK), 25–28 July 2018.
(2020) (Non-)quoting and subjectivity in online discourse. E-rea [Online] 17 (2). Online since 15 June 2020. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Barbara Dancygier
(eds.) (2017) Multimodal Artefacts and the Texture of Viewpoint. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 122 (1–106).Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Kristin Davidse
(2009) The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive Linguistics 20 (4): 777–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Bradley E. & G. Bret Bowers
(2015) Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society 17 (11): 1886–1906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zenner, Eline & Dirk Geeraerts
(2018) One does not simply process memes: Image macros as multimodal constructions. In Esme Winter-Froemel & Verena Thaler (eds), Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research. De Gruyter Mouton. 167–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar