Cover not available
Article published In:
Issues in Diachronic Construction Morphology
Edited by Muriel Norde and Graeme Trousdale
[Constructions and Frames 15:2] 2023
► pp. 160–186

Diachronic changes in constructional networks

Evidence from Manchuric nominal morphology

ORCID logo | University of Potsdam
This study investigates diachronic changes in constructional networks illustrated with examples from the Manchuric branch of Tungusic, an endangered language family spoken in Northeast Asia. Earlier studies have noted pronounced differences between this branch and the rest of the family, such as a reduction in morphological complexity and partial restructuring of the morphosyntactic system. Based on the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar, this study investigates aspects of nominal morphology, including flagging and indexing. These are especially promising for a better understanding of the evolution of Manchuric and have not often been discussed in terms of Construction Grammar.
Keywords: Diachronic Construction Grammar, constructional network, flagging, indexing, head- and dependent-marking, possession, Manchu, Udihe, Tungusic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The nominal template
  • 3.Person indexing
    • 3.1Loss of the paradigm
    • 3.2Preservation in ordinal numerals
  • 4.Flagging
    • 4.1Reduction of the paradigm
    • 4.2Extension of the genitive
    • 4.3Preservation of the locative
    • 4.4Debonding of case markers
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
    • 5.1Network changes
    • 5.2The nature of templates
    • 5.3Areal patterns and language contact
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00071.hol
References (53)
References
Alonso de la Fuente, J. A. (2017). On internal reconstruction, morphological restructuration and nominal classes in Manchu. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 70 (3), 347–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
An, J. (1986). Hezheyu jianzhi. Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Audring, J. (2022). Advances in morphological theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 8 1, 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avrorin, V. A., & Lebedeva, E. P. (1978). Oročskie teksty i slovar’. Nauka.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. (1956). Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4 (7), 543–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Däbritz, C. L. (forthcoming). The structure of the noun phrase in Northern and Southern Ewenki dialects. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 5 1, 83–125. DOI logo
Di Cosmo, N. (2006). The diary of a Manchu soldier in seventeenth-century China. Routledge.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2023). The constructicon. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doerfer, G. (1963). Der Numerus im Mandschu. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
(1978). Classification problems of Tungus. In G. Doerfer & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tungusica, vol. 11 (pp. 1–26). Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Doerfer, G., & Knüppel, M. 2013. Armanisches Wörterbuch. Verlag Traugott Bautz.Google Scholar
Gorelova, L. M. (2002). Manchu Grammar. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2019). Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo 62 1, 93–115.Google Scholar
Hölzl, A. (2015). A typology of negation in Tungusic. Studies in Language, 39 (1), 117–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022a). ‘What’s your name?’ in Tungusic and beyond. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 89–148). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
(2022b). The etymology of “Manchu”: A critical evaluation of the riverside hypothesis. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, 4 (2), 160–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hölzl, A., & Payne, T. E. (2022). Introduction. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 1–20). Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iggesen, O. A. (2013). Number of cases. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Ikegami, J. (1976). The Manchu prolative deri. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, 48 1, 116–120.Google Scholar
(1985). The category of person in Tungus: Its representation in the indicative forms of verbs. Gengō Kenkyū, 88 1, 86–96.Google Scholar
Janhunen, J. (2012). The expansion of Tungusic as an ethnic and linguistic process. In A. Malchukov & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics (pp. 5–16). Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2013). Personal pronouns in Core Altaic. In M. Robbeets & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Shared grammaticalization (pp. 211–226). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiyose, G. N. (2000). Genealogical relationship of Jurchen dialects and literary Manchu. Central Asiatic Journal, 44 (2), 177–189.Google Scholar
Li, Shulan. (1984). Xiboyu jianzhi. Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2007). Language interrupted. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mu, Y. (1986). Alechuka manyu de shuci yu gezhuci. Manyu yanjiu, 1986 (1), 2–17.Google Scholar
(1987). Balayu. Manyu yanjiu, 2 1, 2–31, 128.Google Scholar
Muhamedowa, R. 2016. Kazakh: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, I. (1997). Evenki. Routledge.Google Scholar
Nichols, J., & Bickel, B. (2013). Locus of marking in possessive noun phrases. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Nikolaeva, I., & Tolskaya, M. (2001). A grammar of Udihe. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I., Perekhvalskaya, E. & Tolskaya, M. (2002). Udeghe (Udihe) folk tales. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, J. (1974). A Sketch of Sibe morphology. Central Asiatic Journal 18 1, 159–174.Google Scholar
(2013). A comprehensive Manchu-English dictionary. Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Perekhvalskaya, E. (2022). From consonant to tone: Laryngealized and pharyngealized vowels in Udihe. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 227–262). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Pevnov, A. M. 2012. On some archaic features of the Jurchen language. Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 5 1, 57–69.Google Scholar
Robbeets, M., & Oskolskaya, S. (2022). Proto-Tungusic in time and space. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 263–294). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Smirnova, E., & Sommerer, L. (2020). Introduction: The nature of the node and the network. Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šnejder, E. R. (1936). Kratkij udèjsko-russkij slovar’. Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Tsumagari, T. (1997). Linguistic diversity and national borders of Tungusic. Senri Ethnological Studies, 44 1, 175–186.Google Scholar
(2003). Two Udehe folktale texts. The Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko, 61 1, 43–73.Google Scholar
(2006). Morphological status of the Manchu case markers: Particle or suffix? In A. Pozzi, J. Janhunen & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tumen jalafun jecen akū (pp. 225–232). Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2009). Grammatical outline of Uilta (revised). Journal of the Graduate School of Letters, 4 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
(2011). An Udihe folktale text: “Solomo and Tausima“. Hoppō jinbun kenkyū, 4 1, 75–93.Google Scholar
van der Spuy, A. (2017). Construction Morphology and inflection. Lingua, 199 1, 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, A. (2006). Why Manchu and Jurchen look so non-Tungusic? In A. Pozzi, J. Janhunen & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tumen jalafun jecen akū (pp. 255–266). Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Whaley, L., & Oskolskaya, S. (2020). The classification of the Tungusic languages. In M. Robbeets & A. Savelyev (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Transeurasian languages (pp. 81–91). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zikmundová, V. (2007). The morphology of spatials in Manchu and Sibe in comparison with Mongolian. Mongolica Pragensia, 2007 1, 9–27.Google Scholar
(2013). Spoken Sibe. Morphology of the inflected parts of speech. Karolinum.Google Scholar
(2022). Historical language contact between Sibe and Khorchin. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 293–328). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hölzl, Andreas
2024. Postnominal flagging and OV in Sinitic. Studies in Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.