Article published In:
Issues in Diachronic Construction MorphologyEdited by Muriel Norde and Graeme Trousdale
[Constructions and Frames 15:2] 2023
► pp. 211–233
Edited by Muriel Norde and Graeme Trousdale
[Constructions and Frames 15:2] 2023
► pp. 211–233
The development of heterosemous inflection and derivation
Norwegian abundance plurals and distributive adjectives
In Norwegian, the noun vis ‘manner’ is commonly used to head compounds. It is the historical
source of several suffixes: derivational suffixes in adverbs and adjectives and an inflectional suffix on measure nouns. Thus,
compounding has given rise to both derivation and inflection. These developments are analysed and compared with respect to how
they affect the network of constructions, with a focus on differences between derivation and inflection. The main difference is
that links of similarity and contrast have been centrally involved in the development of inflection, but not of derivation.
Keywords: adjective, adverb, analogy, grammaticalization, measure noun, paradigm, reanalysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The earliest adverbial constructions
- 3.Inflectional constructions
- 3.1Abundance adverbials
- 3.2Postnominal modifiers
- 3.3Pseudopartitive constructions
- 3.4Inflectional paradigms
- 3.5Summary on inflectional constructions
- 4.Derivational constructions
- 4.1Distributive adverbials
- 4.2Prenominal modifiers
- 4.3Derivational paradigms?
- 4.4Summary on derivational constructions
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (27)
Barðdal, J., & Gildea, S. (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar. Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–49). John Benjamins. 
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network. Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, G. (2020). Paradigms lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 277–315). John Benjamins.
Elsner, D. (2015). Adverbial morphology in German. Formations with -weise/-erweise
. In K. Pittner, D. Elsner, & F. Barteld (Eds.), Adverbs. Functional and diachronic aspects (pp. 101–132). John Benjamins.
Enger, H.-O., & Conzett, P. (2016). Morfologi [Morphology]. In H. Sandøy (Ed.), Norsk språkhistorie [Norwegian language history], vol. 11: Mønster [Patterns] (pp. 213–315). Novus.
Enger, H.-O., & Nesset, T. (2011). Constraints on diachronic development: the Animacy Hierarchy and the Relevance Constraint. STUF – Language Typology and Universals,
64
1, 193–212.
Fjeld, R. V., Nøklestad, A., & Hagen, K. (2020). Leksikografisk bokmålskorpus (LBK) – bakgrunn og bruk [The Lexicographic Corpus of Bokmål Norwegian – background and use]. In J. B. Johannessen & K. Hagen (Eds.), Leksikografi og korpus [Lexicography and corpus], Oslo Studies in Language,
11
1, 47–59.
Hansen, Aa. (1933). Sætningen og dens led i moderne dansk [The sentence and its constituents in modern Danish]. Nyt Nordisk Forlag.
Hathout, N., & Namer, F. (2019). Paradigms in word formation: what are we up to? Morphology,
29
1, 153–165.
Kinn, T. (1998). Drøssevis av forsømte avleiingar: ord på -vis
[Heaps of neglected derivatives: words in -vis
]. Nordica Bergensia,
19
1, 101–126.
(2001). Pseudopartitives in Norwegian. University of Bergen PhD dissertation.
(2005). Ord på -vis i moderne norsk: samansetningar, avleiingar – og bøyingsformer? [Words in -vis in modern Norwegian: compounds, derivatives – and inflectional forms?] Maal og Minne,
97
1, 45–78.
(2007). Den historiske utviklinga til ord på -vis
. [The historical development of words in -vis
]. Maal og Minne,
99
1, 9–28 and 158–186.
Leino, J. (2022). Formalizing paradigms in Construction Grammar. In G. Diewald & K. Politt (Eds.), Paradigms regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm (pp. 37–65). Language Science Press.
Lichtenberk, F. (1991). Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language,
67
1, 475–509.
Masini, F., & Audring, J. (2018). Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory (pp. 365–389). Oxford University Press.
Norde, M. (2005). Adverb och adjektiv på -vis i svenskan [Adverbs and adjectives in -vis in Swedish]. Svenskans beskrivning,
27
1, 233–245.
Norde, M., & Morris, C. (2018). Derivation without category change. In K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé, & G. Vanderbauwhede (Eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective (pp. 47–91). John Benjamins.
Opdahl, L. (2003). The suffix -wise: Cinderella or Sleeping Beauty? In K. Aijmer & B. Olinder (Eds.), Proceedings from the 8th Nordic Conference of English Studies (pp. 59–70). Göteborgs universitet.
Štekauer, P. (2014). Derivational paradigms. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (pp. 354–369). Oxford University Press.
Stump, G. T. (1998). Inflection. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 13–43). Blackwell.
Tiisala, S. (1990).
Naturligtvis – från ord till suffix. [
Naturligtvis – from word to suffix]. Svenskans beskrivning,
17
1, 357–366.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Ungerer, T. (to appear). Vertical and horizontal links in constructional networks: Two sides of the same coin? Constructions and Frames.
Van de Velde, F. (2004). Exaptatie en subjectificatie in de Nederlandse adverbiale morfologie [Exaptation and subjectification in Dutch adverbial morphology]. Handelingen – Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse maatschappij voor taal- en letterkunde en geschiedenis,
58
1, 105–124.